Literature DB >> 25267096

Chemoselective boronic ester synthesis by controlled speciation.

James W B Fyfe1, Ciaran P Seath, Allan J B Watson.   

Abstract

Control of boronic acid solution speciation is presented as a new strategy for the chemoselective synthesis of boronic esters. Manipulation of the solution equilibria within a cross-coupling milieu enables the formal homologation of aryl and alkenyl boronic acid pinacol esters. The generation of a new, reactive boronic ester in the presence of an active palladium catalyst also facilitates streamlined iterative catalytic C-C bond formation and provides a method for the controlled oligomerization of sp(2) -hybridized boronic esters.
© 2014 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  boron; chemoselectivity; cross-coupling; oligomerization; palladium

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25267096      PMCID: PMC4501314          DOI: 10.1002/anie.201406714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl        ISSN: 1433-7851            Impact factor:   15.336


Boronic acids and their associated derivatives are extensively used for C=C and C=X bond formation.[1,2] Many of these chemistries rely upon passive control of the solution speciation, that is, a catalyst chemoselectively engages one component of a larger mixture with the associated solution equilibria, enabling full conversion into the subsequent intermediate or product. An excellent exemplar of this is the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction which is contingent upon chemoselective engagement of a specific boron species by a transient palladium(II) intermediate.[3,4] Boron solution speciation can be complex and the deliberate and chemoselective control of the equilibria associated with a mixture of boron species has, to our knowledge, not been described. Common methods for the preparation of sp2 boronic acid pinacol (BPin) esters generally rely upon the stoichiometric manipulation of a single boron species (Figure 1 a). Typical processes include treatment of a nucleophilic organometallic species with, for example, B(OEt)3 followed by hydrolysis and esterification with pinacol.[2,5] More contemporary processes use transition-metal catalysts with B2Pin2 or HBPin to furnish the same target compounds either by C=X cross-coupling or C=H activation processes.[6] In contrast, chemoselective control of a mixture of boron species is more challenging, requiring simultaneous manipulation of multiple equilibria. Accordingly, chemoselective synthesis of a boronic ester based on the control of speciation is a concept that would represent a fundamental advance in the field and provide new opportunities for iterative synthesis by facilitating access to high value components which may be further elaborated.
Figure 1

Strategy for chemoselective synthesis of BPin esters by controlled speciation. Hal=halogen, Pin=pinacolato, MIDA=N-methyliminodiacetic acid.

Strategy for chemoselective synthesis of BPin esters by controlled speciation. Hal=halogen, Pin=pinacolato, MIDA=N-methyliminodiacetic acid. Herein we show that controlling the solution equilibria of boronic acid pinacol (BPin) and N-methyliminodiacetic acid (BMIDA) esters[7] during the course of a Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling event enables chemoselective formal homologation[8] of BPin esters (Figure 1 b). We also demonstrate the utility of this method to facilitate efficient iterative C=C bond formation[9] and to enable the controlled oligomerization of sp2-hybridized BPin esters. We first examined the formal homologation reaction in a benchmark process with PhBPin (1), 4-bromophenylboronic acid MIDA ester (2), a conventional palladium catalyst ([PdCl2dppf]), using 10:1 THF/H2O (22 equiv H2O), and K3PO4 or Cs2CO3 (3 equiv) as the base (Scheme 1).[10,11] Pleasingly, we found that K3PO4 provided the desired product 3 a in 30 % conversion with the mass balance consisting of oligomeric material (6): no BMIDA ester (4) or boronic acid (5) was observed. Cs2CO3 was slightly less effective (27 % conversion into 3 a).
Scheme 1

Initial studies of the formal homologation reaction.[11] dppf=1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene, THF=tetrahydrofuran.

Initial studies of the formal homologation reaction.[11] dppf=1,1′-bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene, THF=tetrahydrofuran. Based on these initial results, a survey of potassium bases demonstrated that K3PO4 was optimal, with those of higher and lower pKaH providing significantly less control and leading to either poor cross-coupling or oligomeric products.[11] Similarly, variation of the phosphate countercation was not tolerated. As expected, the reaction efficiency was found to rely primarily on the stoichiometry of the base and H2O (Table 1).[11] An in depth analysis of H2O and K3PO4 stoichiometry revealed that both the cross-coupling and subsequent boron solution speciation could be effectively controlled using 5 equivalents H2O with 3 equivalents K3PO4 to provide 96 % conversion into the desired product (entry 6). Decreasing the quantity of K3PO4 (entries 2 and 3) and significantly increasing the quantity of H2O (entries 1 and 4) was not tolerated and led to increased oligomerization. Marginal changes to the H2O loading (entries 5 and 7) were tolerated but slightly less effective. Analysis of the reaction time course revealed that under the optimized reaction conditions the initial cross-coupling event was complete in approximately 1 hour with the remaining reaction time (approx. 23 h) required to channel the equilibria to the desired product. Similarly, heating to 90 °C was essential to drive the equilibria to the desired BPin product 3 a: lower temperatures delivered mixtures of 3 a, 4, and 5.[11]
Table 1

Optimization of the formal homologation reaction.[a]

EntryBaseBase equivH2O equiv3 aYield [%][b]
1K3PO432230
2K3PO422224
3K3PO412213
4K3PO435026
5K3PO431090
6K3PO43596
7K3PO43187

 All reactions run on a 0.25 mmol scale in 1 mL THF.[11]

 Determined by HPLC analysis using an internal standard.

Optimization of the formal homologation reaction.[a] All reactions run on a 0.25 mmol scale in 1 mL THF.[11] Determined by HPLC analysis using an internal standard. Having identified the optimal reaction conditions for this speciation controlled chemoselective boronic ester synthesis, we next examined the scope of both the BPin and BMIDA coupling partners (Figure 2). A broad range of common functional groups was tolerated including ethers, esters, amides, nitriles, olefins, and heterocyclic residues (3 a–r). In addition, the reaction was also amenable to the synthesis of olefinic BPin adducts (3 s–x), which progress through the protodeboronation-prone vinyl boronic acid intermediates.[7u] For reactions where the initial cross-coupling was found to be slow, uncontrolled oligomerization was problematic. However, this was readily resolved through use of a more active catalyst system (Pd(OAc)2, SPhos; 3 c, 3 j, 3 o, and 3 q).
Figure 2

Scope of the formal homologation reaction with aryl boronic acid MIDA esters. All yields are those of the isolated products. X=Cl, Br, I. [a] Using Pd(OAc)2 (4 mol %) and SPhos (8 mol %).[11]

Scope of the formal homologation reaction with aryl boronic acid MIDA esters. All yields are those of the isolated products. X=Cl, Br, I. [a] Using Pd(OAc)2 (4 mol %) and SPhos (8 mol %).[11] The ability to generate a new, reactive boronic ester in the presence of an active palladium catalyst offers opportunities for the development of a streamlined iterative catalytic bond formation. Current approaches to iterative bond formation using MIDA boronic esters have relied upon the cross-coupling of a conjunctive MIDA boronic ester, deprotection, and a subsequent cross-coupling.[9] In contrast, generation of a new BPin using our controlled speciation approach provides a more step-efficient process (Scheme 2). Following completion of the formal homologation reaction, addition of a second aryl bromide to the reaction vessel provides expedient access to triaryl adducts, such as the methyl ester of an LPA1 antagonist (7 a),[12] without the requirement for additional catalyst or additives and avoiding any intervening isolation, intermediate modification (e.g., deprotection), or purification steps.[13]
Scheme 2

Streamlined iterative arylation enabled by controlled speciation.[11] Cbz=benzyloxycarbonyl.

Streamlined iterative arylation enabled by controlled speciation.[11] Cbz=benzyloxycarbonyl. To further challenge the applicability of our methodology, we sought to establish a method for controlled oligomerization (Scheme 3). Reaction of a BPin with two haloaryl BMIDA partners enables a double formal sp2 BPin homologation to provide the products 8 and 9. In this process, two new C=C bonds are formed and pinacol is chemoselectively and stoichiometrically transferred over multiple boronic/boric ester species.
Scheme 3

Controlled oligomerization by sequential formal homologation.[11]

Controlled oligomerization by sequential formal homologation.[11] Careful control of both the nature of the base and the stoichiometric relationship between base and H2O was crucial to the development of our reaction. MIDA boronic esters are base labile and require anhydrous cross-coupling conditions to avoid premature hydrolysis, which would lead to uncontrolled oligomerization. Accordingly, the base employed for this reaction was key and played three critical roles: 1) enabling suitably efficient cross-coupling, 2) sequestering H2O to ensure the integrity of the MIDA esters during cross-coupling, and 3) governing the speciation events. The base profoundly impacts upon the transmetalation and reductive elimination events of the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction with the countercation being non-innocent in these processes.[4] In accordance with previous studies,[4] the rate of cross-coupling was found to be diminished when using bases weaker than PO43− (e.g., F3CCO2−, AcO−), with stronger bases (HO−, tBuO−) proving incompatible with the MIDA esters. The effect of counterions other than K+ was remarkable: harder cations (Li+, Na+) were detrimental and Cs+ also exhibited a negative effect.[4e, [11] The key to reconciling the stability of the BMIDA esters with the aqueous base required to control speciation downstream of the cross-coupling event was found through establishing an internal H2O reservoir by exploiting the hygroscopicity of the inorganic base and the associated aqueous biphase. Many common inorganic bases are hygroscopic and generate stable hydrates as well as saturated aqueous solutions of low relative humidity.[10] We have found that a suitable quantity of K3PO4, which forms a stable tetrahydrate,[10] possesses the ideal balance of hygroscopicity to sequester a controlled quantity of H2O to efficiently mitigate the hydrolysis of the MIDA esters and provide effective cross-coupling while simultaneously generating a basic biphase of sufficient pH to control the base-dependent boric acid and boronic acid equilibria. In summary, we have shown that the solution speciation of boronic acids can be chemoselectively controlled to enable the formal homologation of boronic acid pinacol esters. The reaction is tolerant of aryl and vinyl functionality as both the pinacol donor and acceptor, respectively, and enables streamlined iterative cross-coupling as well as a method for controlled oligomerization. This study provides a conceptually new approach for the preparation of boronic acid derivatives to facilitate efficient iterative bond formation.
  25 in total

1.  The triple role of fluoride ions in palladium-catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura reactions: unprecedented transmetalation from [ArPdFL2] complexes.

Authors:  Christian Amatore; Anny Jutand; Gaëtan Le Duc
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Simple, efficient, and modular syntheses of polyene natural products via iterative cross-coupling.

Authors:  Suk Joong Lee; Kaitlyn C Gray; James S Paek; Martin D Burke
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  C-H activation for the construction of C-B bonds.

Authors:  Ibraheem A I Mkhalid; Jonathan H Barnard; Todd B Marder; Jaclyn M Murphy; John F Hartwig
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Stereoretentive Suzuki-Miyaura coupling of haloallenes enables fully stereocontrolled access to (-)-peridinin.

Authors:  Eric M Woerly; Alan H Cherney; Erin K Davis; Martin D Burke
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Highly enantioselective synthesis of tertiary boronic esters and their stereospecific conversion to other functional groups and quaternary stereocentres.

Authors:  Helen K Scott; Varinder K Aggarwal
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 5.236

6.  Mechanistic origin of antagonist effects of usual anionic bases (OH-, CO3(2-)) as modulated by their countercations (Na+, Cs+, K+) in palladium-catalyzed Suzuki-Miyaura reactions.

Authors:  Christian Amatore; Anny Jutand; Gaëtan Le Duc
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 5.236

7.  A simple and general platform for generating stereochemically complex polyene frameworks by iterative cross-coupling.

Authors:  Suk Joong Lee; Thomas M Anderson; Martin D Burke
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 15.336

8.  A general solution for unstable boronic acids: slow-release cross-coupling from air-stable MIDA boronates.

Authors:  David M Knapp; Eric P Gillis; Martin D Burke
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Transforming Suzuki-Miyaura cross-couplings of MIDA boronates into a green technology: no organic solvents.

Authors:  Nicholas A Isley; Fabrice Gallou; Bruce H Lipshutz
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  A general solution for the 2-pyridyl problem.

Authors:  Graham R Dick; Eric M Woerly; Martin D Burke
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 15.336

View more
  7 in total

1.  MIDA boronate allylation - synthesis of ibuprofen.

Authors:  David Phillips; Glen Brodie; Sarah Memarzadeh; Gi Lum Tang; David J France
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.361

2.  Boryl (Hetero)aryne Precursors as Versatile Arylation Reagents: Synthesis through C-H Activation and Orthogonal Reactivity.

Authors:  Emilien Demory; Karthik Devaraj; Andreas Orthaber; Paul J Gates; Lukasz T Pilarski
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  A General Protocol for the Polycondensation of Thienyl N-Methyliminodiacetic Acid Boronate Esters To Form High Molecular Weight Copolymers.

Authors:  Josue Ayuso Carrillo; Michael L Turner; Michael J Ingleson
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  MIDA boronates are hydrolysed fast and slow by two different mechanisms.

Authors:  Jorge A Gonzalez; O Maduka Ogba; Gregory F Morehouse; Nicholas Rosson; Kendall N Houk; Andrew G Leach; Paul H-Y Cheong; Martin D Burke; Guy C Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 24.427

5.  Chemoselective oxidation of aryl organoboron systems enabled by boronic acid-selective phase transfer.

Authors:  John J Molloy; Thomas A Clohessy; Craig Irving; Niall A Anderson; Guy C Lloyd-Jones; Allan J B Watson
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 9.825

6.  Catalyst shuttling enabled by a thermoresponsive polymeric ligand: facilitating efficient cross-couplings with continuously recyclable ppm levels of palladium.

Authors:  Erfei Wang; Mao Chen
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 9.825

7.  Use of N-methyliminodiacetic acid boronate esters in suzuki-miyaura cross-coupling polymerizations of triarylamine and fluorene monomers.

Authors:  Andrew B Foster; Viktor Bagutski; Josue I Ayuso-Carrillo; Martin J Humphries; Michael J Ingleson; Michael L Turner
Journal:  J Polym Sci A Polym Chem       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.702

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.