Literature DB >> 25266871

Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on axillary nodal involvement in patients with clinically node negative triple negative breast cancer.

Carol S Connor1, Bruce F Kimler, Joshua M V Mammen, Marilee K McGinness, Jamie L Wagner, Samantha M Alsop, Claire Ward, Carol J Fabian, Qamar J Khan, Priyanka Sharma.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) versus primary surgery (PS) on axillary disease burden/surgery in clinically node negative Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC).
METHODS: Two hundred forty-three Stage I-III TNBC patients have enrolled on an IRB approved multisite prospective registry. Clinical and treatment information was collected.
RESULTS: One hundred fifty-five patients with clinically node negative TNBC were identified. 47%, 49%, and 4% of patients had T1, T2, and T3 disease, respectively. Patients underwent PS (103/155, 66%) or NAC (52/155, 34%) at the discretion of treating physicians. 17% of PS and 0% of NAC patients were node positive at surgery (P=0.006). For T2 disease, 32% of PS and 0% of NAC patients were node positive at surgery (P=0.001). NAC patients had a lower chance of positive SLNB (0% vs. 12%, P=0.004) and undergoing ALND (2% vs. 22%, P=0.001) than PS patients.
CONCLUSION: In this clinically node negative TNBC cohort, all NAC-treated patients were node negative at surgery, whereas 17% of PS patients had involved axillary nodes. NAC should be considered for clinically node negative TNBC to reduce the extent of axillary surgery even if breast conservation is not planned.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  axillary lymph node dissection; clinically axillary lymph node negative; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; triple negative breast cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25266871     DOI: 10.1002/jso.23790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  6 in total

Review 1.  Update on the Treatment of Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Priyanka Sharma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2018-04-14

2.  How Often Does Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Avoid Axillary Dissection in Patients With Histologically Confirmed Nodal Metastases? Results of a Prospective Study.

Authors:  Anita Mamtani; Andrea V Barrio; Tari A King; Kimberly J Van Zee; George Plitas; Melissa Pilewskie; Mahmoud El-Tamer; Mary L Gemignani; Alexandra S Heerdt; Lisa M Sclafani; Virgilio Sacchini; Hiram S Cody; Sujata Patil; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  Biology and Management of Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Priyanka Sharma
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-07-11

4.  MRI and Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response in the Breast and Axilla after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Joseph J Weber; Maxine S Jochelson; Anne Eaton; Emily C Zabor; Andrea V Barrio; Mary L Gemignani; Melissa Pilewskie; Kimberly J Van Zee; Monica Morrow; Mahmoud El-Tamer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Rates and Prognosis From Phase III Neoadjuvant Systemic Trial Comparing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Pre-Menopausal Patients With Estrogen Receptor-Positive and HER2-Negative, Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sungchan Gwark; Woo Chul Noh; Sei Hyun Ahn; Eun Sook Lee; Yongsik Jung; Lee Su Kim; Wonshik Han; Seok Jin Nam; Gyungyub Gong; Seon-Ok Kim; Hee Jeong Kim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  CCR2 signaling in breast carcinoma cells promotes tumor growth and invasion by promoting CCL2 and suppressing CD154 effects on the angiogenic and immune microenvironments.

Authors:  Gage Brummer; Wei Fang; Curtis Smart; Brandon Zinda; Nadia Alissa; Cory Berkland; David Miller; Nikki Cheng
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 9.867

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.