Literature DB >> 25266728

Continuous EEG monitoring: a survey of neurophysiologists and neurointensivists.

Jay Gavvala1, Nicholas Abend, Suzette LaRoche, Cecil Hahn, Susan T Herman, Jan Claassen, Mícheál Macken, Stephan Schuele, Elizabeth Gerard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Continuous EEG monitoring (cEEG) of critically ill adults is being used with increasing frequency, and practice guidelines on indications for cEEG monitoring have recently been published. However, data describing the current practice of cEEG in critically ill adults is limited. We aimed to describe the current practice of cEEG monitoring in adults in the United States.
METHODS: A survey assessing cEEG indications and procedures was sent to one intensivist and one neurophysiologist responsible for intensive care unit (ICU) cEEG at 151 institutions in the United States. At some institutions only one physician could be identified.
RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven physicians from 97 institutions completed the survey. Continuous EEG is utilized by nearly all respondents to detect nonconvulsive seizures (NCS) in patients with altered mental status following clinical seizures, intra cerebral hemorrhage (ICH), traumatic brain injury, and cardiac arrest, as well as to characterize abnormal movements suspected to be seizures. The majority of physicians monitor comatose patients for 24-48 h. In an ideal situation with unlimited resources, 18% of respondents would increase cEEG duration. Eighty-six percent of institutions have an on-call EEG technologist available 24/7 for new patient hookups, but only 26% have technologists available 24/7 in-house. There is substantial variability in who reviews EEG and how frequently it is reviewed as well as use of quantitative EEG. SIGNIFICANCE: Although there is general agreement regarding the indications for ICU cEEG, there is substantial interinstitutional variability in how the procedure is performed. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
© 2014 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous video-EEG monitoring; Nonconvulsive seizures; Quantitative EEG

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25266728     DOI: 10.1111/epi.12809

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  38 in total

1.  Periodic Assessment of the Use of Continuous EEG Monitoring.

Authors:  David Spencer
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 7.500

2.  Continuous EEG is associated with favorable hospitalization outcomes for critically ill patients.

Authors:  Chloe E Hill; Leah J Blank; Dylan Thibault; Kathryn A Davis; Nabila Dahodwala; Brian Litt; Allison W Willis
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  It HELPS 2NO When to Stop Continuous EEG Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Aatif M Husain
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 7.500

4.  Use of EEG in critically ill children and neonates in the United States of America.

Authors:  Marina Gaínza-Lein; Iván Sánchez Fernández; Tobias Loddenkemper
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  A standardized nomenclature for spectrogram EEG patterns: Inter-rater agreement and correspondence with common intensive care unit EEG patterns.

Authors:  Sahar F Zafar; Edilberto Amorim; Craig A Williamsom; Jin Jing; Emily J Gilmore; Hiba A Haider; Christa Swisher; Aaron Struck; Eric S Rosenthal; Marcus Ng; Sarah Schmitt; Jong W Lee; M Brandon Westover
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Consensus statement on continuous EEG in critically ill adults and children, part I: indications.

Authors:  Susan T Herman; Nicholas S Abend; Thomas P Bleck; Kevin E Chapman; Frank W Drislane; Ronald G Emerson; Elizabeth E Gerard; Cecil D Hahn; Aatif M Husain; Peter W Kaplan; Suzette M LaRoche; Marc R Nuwer; Mark Quigg; James J Riviello; Sarah E Schmitt; Liberty A Simmons; Tammy N Tsuchida; Lawrence J Hirsch
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.177

Review 7.  Noninvasive Neuromonitoring: Current Utility in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Traumatic Brain Injury, and Stroke.

Authors:  Luisa Vinciguerra; Julian Bösel
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.210

8.  Development of Expert-Level Automated Detection of Epileptiform Discharges During Electroencephalogram Interpretation.

Authors:  Jin Jing; Haoqi Sun; Jennifer A Kim; Aline Herlopian; Ioannis Karakis; Marcus Ng; Jonathan J Halford; Douglas Maus; Fonda Chan; Marjan Dolatshahi; Carlos Muniz; Catherine Chu; Valeria Sacca; Jay Pathmanathan; Wendong Ge; Justin Dauwels; Alice Lam; Andrew J Cole; Sydney S Cash; M Brandon Westover
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 18.302

9.  Implementation of Continuous Video-Electroencephalography at a Community Hospital Enhances Care and Reduces Costs.

Authors:  Brad J Kolls; Brian E Mace; Keith E Dombrowski
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Development and Feasibility Testing of a Critical Care EEG Monitoring Database for Standardized Clinical Reporting and Multicenter Collaborative Research.

Authors:  Jong Woo Lee; Suzette LaRoche; Hyunmi Choi; Andres A Rodriguez Ruiz; Evan Fertig; Jeffrey M Politsky; Susan T Herman; Tobias Loddenkemper; Arnold J Sansevere; Pearce J Korb; Nicholas S Abend; Joshua L Goldstein; Saurabh R Sinha; Keith E Dombrowski; Eva K Ritzl; Michael B Westover; Jay R Gavvala; Elizabeth E Gerard; Sarah E Schmitt; Jerzy P Szaflarski; Kan Ding; Kevin F Haas; Richard Buchsbaum; Lawrence J Hirsch; Courtney J Wusthoff; Jennifer L Hopp; Cecil D Hahn
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.177

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.