Literature DB >> 25266227

Magnetic resonance characterization of septal bounce: findings of blood impact physiology.

George O Angheloiu1, Geetha Rayarao, Ronald Williams, June Yamrozik, Mark Doyle, Robert W W Biederman.   

Abstract

'Septal bounce' is a pathognomonic sign of constrictive pericarditis (CP). The objectives of the study are to resolve the etiology of the septal bounce, to generate septal bounce-related diagnostic tools, and to prove that its presence is related to the mechanical interaction between the atrioventricular inflow and the inter-ventricular septum. We compared steady state free precession four-chamber images between 11 CP patients and 11 controls via cardiac magnetic resonance. The septal bounce was composed of two movements observed during every cardiac cycle, simultaneous with the rapid filling and atrial systole respectively. Three parameters (measured at end-systole) were generated: right ventricular (RV) clamp (compression ratio of the RV)-greater in CP (0.88 ± 0.03) than controls (0.85 ± 0.03, p = 0.02), tri-septal angle between the tricuspid valve annulus plane and the interventricular septum (81° ± 9° vs. 91° ± 7°, p = 0.01), and impact angle between the tricuspid inflow vector and septum (8.6° ± 8.7° vs. 0° ± 6.6°, p = 0.01). The accuracy, positive predictive value, sensitivity and specificity of these parameters in differentiating CP from controls ranged from 100 to 82 %. A forth parameter-septal flow ratio, gauging the proportion of tricuspid inflow impacting the septum, was markedly higher in CP than controls (0.38 ± 0.19 vs. 0.01 ± 0.03, p < 0.0001) with 100 % sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value. The septal bounce consists of two sequential movements during each cardiac cycle, is time-related with the rapid ventricular filling and atrial systole, and likely represents a result of the tricuspid blood inflow impacting the interventricular septum. Four septal bounce-derived parameters have a good accuracy in differentiating CP from volunteers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25266227     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-014-0537-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  14 in total

1.  Diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis by tagged cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  S Kojima; N Yamada; Y Goto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Longitudinal computational fluid dynamics study of aneurysmal dilatation in a chronic DeBakey type III aortic dissection.

Authors:  Christof Karmonik; Sasan Partovi; Matthias Müller-Eschner; Jean Bismuth; Mark G Davies; Dipan J Shah; Matthias Loebe; Dittmar Böckler; Alan B Lumsden; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Lack of slippage by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging is sine qua non for constrictive pericarditis.

Authors:  Hari Bogabathina; Robert W W Biederman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  The shear stress of busting blood clots.

Authors:  David M Wootton; B Rita Alevriadou
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Septal bounce, vena cava plethora, and pericardial adhesion: informative two-dimensional echocardiographic signs in the diagnosis of pericardial constriction.

Authors:  R B Himelman; E Lee; N B Schiller
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  1988 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function after pericardiectomy in patients with constrictive pericarditis: Doppler echocardiographic findings and correlation with clinical status.

Authors:  M Senni; M M Redfield; L H Ling; G K Danielson; A J Tajik; J K Oh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Annulus paradoxus: transmitral flow velocity to mitral annular velocity ratio is inversely proportional to pulmonary capillary wedge pressure in patients with constrictive pericarditis.

Authors:  J W Ha; J K Oh; L H Ling; R A Nishimura; J B Seward; A J Tajik
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Constrictive pericarditis in the modern era: novel criteria for diagnosis in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Deepak R Talreja; Rick A Nishimura; Jae K Oh; David R Holmes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  The relative atrial volume ratio and late gadolinium enhancement provide additive information to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Huaibing Cheng; Shihua Zhao; Shiliang Jiang; Minjie Lu; Chaowu Yan; Jian Ling; Yan Zhang; Qiong Liu; Ning Ma; Gang Yin; Renate Jerecic; Zuoxiang He
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Hemodynamic predictors of aortic dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve by velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  P Martijn den Reijer; Denver Sallee; Petra van der Velden; Eline R Zaaijer; W James Parks; Senthil Ramamurthy; Trevor Q Robbie; Giorgina Donati; Carey Lamphier; Rudolf P Beekman; Marijn E Brummer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.364

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular imaging 2015 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Hiram G Bezerra; Ricardo A Costa; Johan H C Reiber; Paul Schoenhagen; Arthur A Stillman; Johan De Sutter; Nico R L Van de Veire
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Systematic review of non-invasive cardiovascular imaging in the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis.

Authors:  Sivakumar Ardhanari; Bharath Yarlagadda; Vishal Parikh; Kevin C Dellsperger; Anand Chockalingam; Sudarshan Balla; Senthil Kumar
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2016-06-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.