While most of the studies on molecular machines have been performed in solution, interfacing these supramolecular systems with solid-state nanostructures and materials is very important in view of their utilization in sensing components working by chemical and photonic actuation. Host polymeric materials, and particularly polymer nanofibers, enable the manipulation of the functional molecules constituting molecular machines and provide a way to induce and control the supramolecular organization. Here, we present electrospun nanocomposites embedding a self-assembling rotaxane-type system that is responsive to both optical (UV-vis light) and chemical (acid/base) stimuli. The system includes a molecular axle comprised of a dibenzylammonium recognition site and two azobenzene end groups and a dibenzo[24]crown-8 molecular ring. The dethreading and rethreading of the molecular components in nanofibers induced by exposure to base and acid vapors, as well as the photoisomerization of the azobenzene end groups, occur in a similar manner to what observed in solution. Importantly, however, the nanoscale mechanical function following external chemical stimuli induces a measurable variation of the macroscopic mechanical properties of nanofibers aligned in arrays, whose Young's modulus is significantly enhanced upon dethreading of the axles from the rings. These composite nanosystems show therefore great potential for application in chemical sensors, photonic actuators, and environmentally responsive materials.
While most of the studies on molecular machines have been performed in solution, interfacing these supramolecular systems with solid-state nanostructures and materials is very important in view of their utilization in sensing components working by chemical and photonic actuation. Host polymeric materials, and particularly polymer nanofibers, enable the manipulation of the functional molecules constituting molecular machines and provide a way to induce and control the supramolecular organization. Here, we present electrospun nanocomposites embedding a self-assembling rotaxane-type system that is responsive to both optical (UV-vis light) and chemical (acid/base) stimuli. The system includes a molecular axle comprised of a dibenzylammonium recognition site and two azobenzene end groups and a dibenzo[24]crown-8 molecular ring. The dethreading and rethreading of the molecular components in nanofibers induced by exposure to base and acid vapors, as well as the photoisomerization of the azobenzene end groups, occur in a similar manner to what observed in solution. Importantly, however, the nanoscale mechanical function following external chemical stimuli induces a measurable variation of the macroscopic mechanical properties of nanofibers aligned in arrays, whose Young's modulus is significantly enhanced upon dethreading of the axles from the rings. These composite nanosystems show therefore great potential for application in chemical sensors, photonic actuators, and environmentally responsive materials.
Molecular
machines are multicomponent (supramolecular) assemblies
able to perform a mechanical function following an external chemical,
optical, magnetic, or electrical stimulus. Applications include their
utilization as tweezers, catalysts, motors, switches, memories, logic
gates, and valves of interest in materials science, information technology,
and medicine.[1−6] Threaded and interlocked molecular structures such as rotaxanes,
catenanes, and related systems are most appealing platforms for the
development of artificial nanoscale machines and motors.To
date, most of the studies on molecular machines have been performed
in the liquid phase. Working in solution is convenient from the experimental
viewpoint, allowing the molecular degrees of freedom at the base of
the machine operations to be fully exploited. However, the random
and variable distribution of the molecules prevents the addressing
of individual molecules or given ensembles in a coherent way, which
is an essential requirement to turn molecular functions into mesoscopic
and macroscopic operations.[6,7] Such functions would
be enabled by the interaction of the molecular machines with the environment,
triggered by external stimulation of individual molecules or of a
set of them and by suitable effects on the physicochemical properties
that allow the actual molecular status to be sensed/read.[8] Therefore, there is a growing need to interface
molecular machines with solid supports, by integrating them with nanostructured
materials and devices, and to study the properties of these hybrid
materials.In recent years, pioneering efforts have been devoted
to the incorporation
of molecular machines and motors in heterogeneous matrices and to
the study of efficient strategies for delivering proper stimuli and
detecting the resulting molecular changes. Examples include molecular
machines deposited on surfaces as mono- or multilayers,[9−12] embedded in solid crystals,[13] liquid
crystals,[14] and gels,[15] coupled with nanoparticles,[16,17] integrated
in electronic circuits,[18] and incorporated
in metal–organic frameworks.[19−22] Only a few studies have been
focused on polymeric host materials.[23−26] In this kind of systems, polymer
molding could enable the manipulation of the functional molecules,
and provide a way to induce supramolecular organization or rearrangements
of the incorporated molecular guests. Moreover, polymers can convey
the proper stimuli to the embedded nanomachines, and they can be used
for sensing the molecular state in real time by optical, electrical,
or chemical signals. The large variety of polymers and nanocomposites
with tailored physicochemical properties, together with the easy processability
and low cost, are further elements of interest toward this approach.
For instance, azobenzene-based photochromic systems have been integrated
in brush-type polymers[27] and liquid-crystalline
polymer springs,[28] an approach allowing
reversible, macroscopic morphological changes of the composite material
to be achieved by photoisomerization of the azobenzene units.Furthermore, the features of polymer structures embedding molecular
machines can be improved via nanostructuring, in order to enhance
the surface-to-volume ratio, and make the interactions with the surrounding
environment more efficient.[26,29−31] In particular, polymer nanofibers show several advantages, such
as their flexibility and the possibility to be easily integrated in
optical or electronic devices. Moreover, the composition and structure
of nanofibers made by electrospinning[32−34] can be easily tailored
to target specific applied stimuli (physical and/or chemical). The
high stretching rate of electrified jets favors the orientation of
macromolecules and of embedded dopants and nanoparticles as well.[35−40]Here, we present electrospun nanocomposites embedding a self-assembling
rotaxane-type system that is responsive to both optical (UV–vis
light) and chemical (acid/base) stimuli.[41] The system is composed of a polyether molecular ring and a molecular
axle containing a recognition site for the ring and terminated with
photoactive azobenzene units. Solution studies showed that the E–Z photoisomerization of the terminal
azobenzene units converts the system between thermodynamically stable
(pseudorotaxane) and kinetically inert (rotaxane) forms.[41] Here, the reversible photoisomerization of the
azobenzene units in the nanofibers is investigated by absorption spectroscopy.
Moreover, the reversible dethreading and rethreading of the axle and
the ring in the electrospun fibers by chemical stimulation is also
assessed, using photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy. Interestingly,
we find that the macroscopic mechanical properties of the nanofiber
mats embedding the pseudorotaxane complexes are influenced by their
dethreading and rethreading processes at the molecular scale.
The system is composed of a molecular axle, EE-1H·PF6, comprising a dibenzylammonium
recognition
site and two azobenzene end groups and a dibenzo[24]crown-8 molecular
ring 2 (Figure 1a).[41,42] Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) is used as matrix due to its good
plastic behavior, processability, and optical transparency (up to
93% in the visible spectral range), making it suitable for embedding
photoactive compounds.[25,43,44] In organic solution, EE-1H·PF6 and 2 self-assemble efficiently and rapidly
to yield the pseudorotaxane [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6.
Figure 1
(a) Molecular structure of the axle (EE-1H·PF6) and ring (2). (b) Schematic
representation of the photochemical (E–Z isomerization of the azobenzene end units of the axle)
and chemical (deprotonation/reprotonation-induced dethreading/rethreading)
processes that the axle and ring molecular components can undergo
inside the fibers.
(a) Molecular structure of the axle (EE-1H·PF6) and ring (2). (b) Schematic
representation of the photochemical (E–Z isomerization of the azobenzene end units of the axle)
and chemical (deprotonation/reprotonation-induced dethreading/rethreading)
processes that the axle and ring molecular components can undergo
inside the fibers.Our nanofibers, which
in their pristine form embed the [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6 complex, can go through
various photochemical or chemical processes
as schematized in Figure 1b. In order to induce
the E → Z photoisomerization
of the azobenzene end groups [processes (i) → (iii) and (ii)
→ (iv) in Figure 1b], the nanofibers
are exposed to UV light for increasing time intervals. The photoisomerization
of the azobenzene end groups is reversible, and the initial state
can be restored upon Z → E conversion triggered by irradiation with blue light [processes (iii)
→ (i) and (iv) → (ii)]. Furthermore, on the basis of
solution behavior, deprotonation of the ammonium recognition site
with a base is expected to cause the disassembly of the complex, as
schematized in processes (i) → (ii) and (iii) → (iv)
in Figure 1b.[41,42] Eventually,
treatment with an acid should cause reprotonation of the amine center
and trigger rethreading of the ring and axle components [processes
(ii) → (i) and (iv) → (iii)]. The dethreading and rethreading
of the supramolecular complexes in the fibers, induced by exposure
to base and acid vapors, respectively, are here explored with the
aim of evaluating the potential of such composite nanosystems as chemical
sensors and environmentally responsive materials.Figure 2a,b shows randomly oriented and
nearly aligned fibers containing [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6, that feature an average
diameter of about 600 and 350 nm, respectively. Aligned fibers are
relatively thinner and exhibit a narrower dispersion in diameter,
because of the additional mechanical stretching exerted by the rotating
collector on the polymeric jet.[45] The elemental
analysis performed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) in
different areas of the composite nanofibers (Figure 2c) indicates a uniform distribution of dopants throughout
the sample mats.
Figure 2
Scanning electron micrographs of randomly oriented (a)
and prevalently
aligned (b) PMMA/[EE-1H⊂2]·PF6 fibers. In (b), about 70% of fibers
have their longitudinal axis within 10° from the main alignment
direction (see Figure S1). Inset: photograph
of a uniaxially oriented, [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-based nanofiber mat (scale bar: 1 cm).
(c) EDS spectra of [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-based fibers measured in three different areas of the sample.
The spectra are vertically shifted for better clarity. Inset: SEM
micrograph of the fibers showing the 150 × 150 μm2 investigated regions. Scale bar: 200 μm.
Scanning electron micrographs of randomly oriented (a)
and prevalently
aligned (b) PMMA/[EE-1H⊂2]·PF6 fibers. In (b), about 70% of fibers
have their longitudinal axis within 10° from the main alignment
direction (see Figure S1). Inset: photograph
of a uniaxially oriented, [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-based nanofiber mat (scale bar: 1 cm).
(c) EDS spectra of [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-based fibers measured in three different areas of the sample.
The spectra are vertically shifted for better clarity. Inset: SEM
micrograph of the fibers showing the 150 × 150 μm2 investigated regions. Scale bar: 200 μm.
Photoisomerization of [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-Based Fibers
The occurrence of E → Z photoisomerization of the complexes
induced by irradiation with UV laser light [process (i) → (iii)
in Figure 1b] is assessed by the change in
the absorption spectrum of randomly oriented fibers (Figure 3a). The intensity of the peak at about 325 nm, characteristic
of the EE-form of the axle component,[41] decreases with increasing UV exposure time,
as shown in Figure 3b. No more changes in the
absorption intensity are observed for exposures longer than about
20 min, indicating that a photostationary state is reached, as commonly
observed in azobenzene photoisomerization processes. On the basis
of the solution absorption spectra of EE-1H·PF6 and ZZ-1H·PF6 it can be assumed that the absorbance of the Z-azobenzene unit at 325 nm is much smaller than that of the E-isomer and can therefore be neglected. Hence the absorption
changes show that about 40% of the E-azobenzene units
present in nanofibers are transformed to the Z-form.
Since the two azobenzene units of EE-1H·PF6 are equivalent and independent from one another,
the photoreacted units are statistically distributed among the axle
molecules, and thus the photostationary state should contain about
44% EE-, 32% EZ-, and 24% ZZ-form of the axle. Exposure of the UV irradiated samples
to a blue laser beam causes opposite spectral changes (Figure 3c), indicating that the Z-azobenzene
units are converted to the E-isomer [process (iii)
→ (i) in Figure 1b]. The initial value
of absorption intensity at 325 nm is completely recovered after about
10 min (Figure 3d), related to the complete
transformation of the molecules back to the original EE-form. This demonstrates both the expected reversibility of azobenzene
photoisomerization in different environments[46,47] and, more interestingly, the excellent photochemical properties
of the axle which are retained in nanofibers. Figure 3e shows the change in the intensity of the 325 nm peak upon
five consecutive cycles of alternated irradiation periods with UV
and blue laser light, evidencing fatigue resistance in photochemical
cycling.
Figure 3
(a) Absorption spectra of [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-based nanofibers after different UV
exposure intervals. Irradiation parameters: λ = 355 nm, pulsed
incident fluence = 60 μJ cm–2. (b) Absorption
values (λ = 325 nm) vs UV exposure time, corresponding to the
spectra shown in (a). The continuous line is a guide for the eye.
(c) Absorption spectra of fibers, previously subjected to exhaustive
UV irradiation, for increasing time intervals of blue laser light
exposure. Irradiation parameters: λ = 405 nm, incident intensity
= 1.4 mW cm–2. (d) Plot of the absorption values
(λ = 325 nm) versus blue laser exposure time, corresponding
to the spectra shown in (c). The continuous line is a guide for the
eye. (e) Absorption changes at λ = 325 nm, for consecutive cycles
of alternated UV and blue laser irradiation.
(a) Absorption spectra of [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-based nanofibers after different UV
exposure intervals. Irradiation parameters: λ = 355 nm, pulsed
incident fluence = 60 μJ cm–2. (b) Absorption
values (λ = 325 nm) vs UV exposure time, corresponding to the
spectra shown in (a). The continuous line is a guide for the eye.
(c) Absorption spectra of fibers, previously subjected to exhaustive
UV irradiation, for increasing time intervals of blue laser light
exposure. Irradiation parameters: λ = 405 nm, incident intensity
= 1.4 mW cm–2. (d) Plot of the absorption values
(λ = 325 nm) versus blue laser exposure time, corresponding
to the spectra shown in (c). The continuous line is a guide for the
eye. (e) Absorption changes at λ = 325 nm, for consecutive cycles
of alternated UV and blue laser irradiation.In electrospun nanofibers, both the polymer and embedded
guest
molecules can be stretched because of the applied electric field.[39,45,48−50] Polarized infrared
spectroscopy can provide insightful information on the resulting molecular
alignment. For instance, the Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) absorption
signal at 1730 cm–1, arising from the C=O
stretching of PMMA,[51] has a maximum for
incident light polarized along the fiber axis, a result that evidences
a partial alignment of the PMMA molecules (Figure 4a). For this mode we measure a dichroic ratio (R)[39] of 1.5, calculated as R = A∥/A⊥, where A∥ and A⊥ are the absorption intensities for light polarized
parallel and perpendicular to the fiber axis of alignment, respectively.
A similar analysis is performed for the absorption peak at 1592 cm–1, attributed to vibration of the C=C on the
benzene ring[52] (Figure 4a, inset) of the molecule 2 (see Figure S2). The found dichroic ratio of ∼ –0.73
for this signal is indicative of a partial alignment of the [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6 complex along the fiber axis.
Figure 4
(a) FTIR spectra of [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-based
fibers before UV exposure, taken
at two angles of light polarization (0° and 90° with respect
to fibers axis of alignment; continuous and dashed line, respectively).
Inset: close-up of spectra around 1592 cm–1. (b)
Transmitted intensity of the peak at 1592 cm–1 vs
angle (θ) formed by the polarization direction of incident light
and the axis of alignment, before (full squares) and after (empty
circles) UV exposure (pulsed incident fluence = 60 μJ cm–2). Continuous lines represent the data fitting according
to Malus’ law.
(a) FTIR spectra of [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-based
fibers before UV exposure, taken
at two angles of light polarization (0° and 90° with respect
to fibers axis of alignment; continuous and dashed line, respectively).
Inset: close-up of spectra around 1592 cm–1. (b)
Transmitted intensity of the peak at 1592 cm–1 vs
angle (θ) formed by the polarization direction of incident light
and the axis of alignment, before (full squares) and after (empty
circles) UV exposure (pulsed incident fluence = 60 μJ cm–2). Continuous lines represent the data fitting according
to Malus’ law.As the azobenzene photoisomerization could affect such a
molecular
arrangement, we analyzed the absorption intensity at 1592 cm–1 varying the polarization angle of the incident light (Figure 4b). The dependence of the transmitted intensity
(I) of linearly polarized light upon passing through
aligned fibers, on the angle (θ) formed by the directions of
polarization of the incident light and the main axis of alignment,
is roughly described by Malus’ law, I = I0 cos2θ + I1, where I1 indicates the
intensity of the unpolarized background. Following UV exposure, we
do not find significant differences in the polarization curve. The
relative positions of the azobenzene moieties with respect to the
axle longitudinal direction are expected to change as a consequence
of E → Z photoisomerization.
Hence, our findings indicate that upon photoisomerization the transition
moments related to the signal of 2 at 1592 cm–1 are not significantly tilted with respect to the fiber longitudinal
axis. This result suggests that the geometrical changes associated
with isomerization have a negligible effect on the ring-axle supramolecular
arrangement.
Dethreading and Rethreading by Acid/Base
Gas Exposure
In order to study the eventual dethreading and
rethreading of the
axle and ring in fibers, these are exposed to triethylamine (TEA)
and HCl vapors for time intervals up to 4 h, and the molecular assembly
is extensively analyzed by PL spectroscopy. Upon UV excitation, the
ring has a characteristic fluorescence emission peaked at about 310
nm,[53−55] whose intensity is completely quenched upon association
with a molecular axle containing either E- or Z-azobenzene units (Figure S3). Conversely, the axle is not luminescent (Figure
S3). We first investigate the fluorescence properties of the
pseudorotaxane system in solution, following base/acid treatment in
order to induce the dethreading and rethreading of the ring and the
axle.[41] The results of such an analysis
(Figure S4) show a quenching of the ring
fluorescence upon formation of the pseudorotaxane complex, compared
to a solution containing only the ring. The fluorescence intensity
increases upon addition of TEA, suggesting that the deprotonated axle
undergoes dethreading, and decreases again by adding HCl, in agreement
with the rethreading of the protonated axle. The incomplete recovery
of the initial emission intensity (Figure S4) is most likely related to the fact that, in CHCl3, the
strongly coordinating Cl– anions compete with the
ring for the ammonium site more efficiently than the PF6– counterions.[56,57]Therefore,
the measurements of the ring PL provide a mean to investigate the
dethreading and rethreading of the axle and ring. Here, this method
is used to study such processes in solid-state fibers, since the spectral
features of the axle and the ring are preserved upon electrospinning
the molecular components with PMMA (Figure S5). Figure 5a shows the PL spectrum of the
nanofibers embedding the [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6 complex, which exhibits an emission
band at λmax = 305 nm attributed to the uncomplexed
ring molecules. The intensity of this emission band increases remarkably
after exposure to TEA vapors (Figure 5b) and
decreases again to smaller values after subsequent exposure to HCl
vapors (Figure 5c). These results are consistent
with a dethreading of the ring from the axle upon deprotonation of
the ammonium site, induced by the TEA vapors [Figure 1b, process (i) → (ii)], and with successive rethreading
caused by acid treatment [Figure 1b, process
(ii) → (i)]. The observed increase of the ring PL intensity
suggests that the TEA-induced dethreading is quantitative (Figure 5a,b). In addition, the initial PL intensity is almost
exactly restored upon HCl exposure (Figure 5a–c), in contrast to what observed in solution (Figure S4a-c). Such a finding suggests that rethreading
is more efficient in the fibers with respect to the organic solvent,
possibly because the association of the chloride anions with the ammonium
center, which hinders rethreading in organic solution, does not take
place in the PMMA matrix.
Figure 5
(a–c) PL spectra of [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-based
fibers, before (a) and after
(b) exposure to TEA vapors for 4 h. (c) PL spectra of the samples
shown in (a) and (b) after an additional exposure to HCl vapors for
4 h. (d) and (e) PL intensity of [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-based fibers versus
TEA (d) and HCl (e) exposure times. The samples used in (e) are first
exposed to TEA vapors for 4 h. Continuous lines are guides for the
eye. (f–h) PL spectra of [ZZ-1H⊂2]·PF6-based fibers PMMA, before
(f) and after exposure to TEA (g) and HCl (h) vapors, respectively.
In all cases, excitation was performed at 266 nm.
(a–c) PL spectra of [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-based
fibers, before (a) and after
(b) exposure to TEA vapors for 4 h. (c) PL spectra of the samples
shown in (a) and (b) after an additional exposure to HCl vapors for
4 h. (d) and (e) PL intensity of [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-based fibers versus
TEA (d) and HCl (e) exposure times. The samples used in (e) are first
exposed to TEA vapors for 4 h. Continuous lines are guides for the
eye. (f–h) PL spectra of [ZZ-1H⊂2]·PF6-based fibers PMMA, before
(f) and after exposure to TEA (g) and HCl (h) vapors, respectively.
In all cases, excitation was performed at 266 nm.In control experiments performed by exposing either (i) bare
PMMA
fibers or PMMA fibers embedding only the ring component to TEA or
(ii) PMMA/[EE-1H⊂2]·PF6 fibers to N2 (used as a carrier
gas for TEA treatments), the samples do not show any variation of
the intensity of the PL band attributed to the ring (Figure S6). These results evidence that the change of the
ring PL signal cannot arise from interactions of either the fiber
matrix or the fluorescent component with the TEA molecules. Overall,
our findings indicate that the exposure of [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6 fibers to TEA
vapors causes the disassembly of the threaded complex, which is reversibly
reassembled by treatment with HCl.In order to have a more in-depth
understanding of the dethreading/rethreading
kinetics, [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-based fibers are exposed to TEA vapors and,
successively, to HCl vapors for variable exposure times in a range
comprised between 15 min and 4 h. The results, shown in Figure 5d,e, highlight that most of the PL intensity increase/decrease
occurs within about 120 min. Such time-dependent changes can be attributed
to the barrier associated with the dethreading/rethreading processes
in the polymer matrix, combined with gas diffusion in electrospun
fibers, which is known to occur on time scales of a few tens of minutes.[44] Furthermore, [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6 fibers exposed first
to UV laser light and then to TEA/HCl do not show significant differences
(Figure 5f–h) compared to samples directly
treated with TEA/HCl (Figure 5a–c),
indicating that the dethreading/rethreading [processes (iii) →
(iv) and (iv) → (iii) in Figure 1b]
of the ring and axle components in the fibers can occur even after
the photoisomerization of the azobenzene units of the axle, as reported
in solution.[41,42] Similarly, the E → Z photoisomerization of the azobenzene
units of the axle in the fibers is not significantly affected by the
TEA-induced dethreading, as shown in Figure 6 wherein processes (ii) → (iv) and (iv) → (ii) of Figure 1b are examined.
Figure 6
(a) Absorption spectra of [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-based nanofibers after
exposure to TEA for
2 h and subsequent, different UV exposure intervals. Irradiation parameters:
λ = 355 nm, pulsed incident fluence = 60 μJ cm–2. (b) Corresponding absorption values (λ = 325 nm) as a function
of UV exposure times. The continuous line is a guide for the eye.
(c) Absorption spectra of nanofibers, previously underwent UV irradiation,
for increasing time intervals of blue laser light exposure. Irradiation
parameters: λ = 405 nm, incident fluence = 1.4 mW cm–2. (d) Corresponding absorption values (λ = 325 nm) as a function
of exposure time. The continuous line is a guide for the eye. (e)
Plot of the absorption changes at λ = 325 nm, for consecutive
cycles of alternated UV and blue laser irradiation.
(a) Absorption spectra of [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-based nanofibers after
exposure to TEA for
2 h and subsequent, different UV exposure intervals. Irradiation parameters:
λ = 355 nm, pulsed incident fluence = 60 μJ cm–2. (b) Corresponding absorption values (λ = 325 nm) as a function
of UV exposure times. The continuous line is a guide for the eye.
(c) Absorption spectra of nanofibers, previously underwent UV irradiation,
for increasing time intervals of blue laser light exposure. Irradiation
parameters: λ = 405 nm, incident fluence = 1.4 mW cm–2. (d) Corresponding absorption values (λ = 325 nm) as a function
of exposure time. The continuous line is a guide for the eye. (e)
Plot of the absorption changes at λ = 325 nm, for consecutive
cycles of alternated UV and blue laser irradiation.
Mechanical Properties
Finally, we
investigate the possible
corresponding variations of the macroscopic mechanical
properties of the fibers due to the embedded pseudorotaxane components.
The results reported in Figure 7 clearly show
that, while the mechanical properties of pristine PMMA nanofibers
are in good agreement with previous reports,[58] the presence and, more interestingly, the dethreading of the axle
and ring affect the mechanical properties of nanofibers. In particular,
while the maximum strain (Figure 7b) and ultimate
tensile strength (Figure 7c) show minor changes,
large differences are found for the Young’s modulus. The average
Young’s modulus of pure PMMA nanofibers aligned in arrays is
here measured to be around (50 ± 10) MPa (not varying significantly
following exposure to TEA), whereas it doubles in consequence of the
embedment of either [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6 (Figure 7a)
or its axle component alone (Figure S7a). Upon TEA exposure, the Young’s modulus of [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-doped
fibers further increases up to (160 ± 20) MPa, indicating a significantly
enhanced stiffness of the nanofibrous mat upon ring-axle dethreading.
Instead, control experiments carried out on nanofibers with only the
axle component do not lead to a similar increase of the Young’s
modulus (Figure S7), thus ruling out a
significant influence of the bare axle deprotonation on the mechanical
properties at macroscale.
Figure 7
Mechanical properties of PMMA and PMMA/[EE-1H⊂2]·PF6 nanofibers before
and after TEA exposure. (a) Young’s modulus; (b) strain; and
(c) tensile strength. (d) Representative stress/strain curves. Results
are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Bars show statistically
significant differences (P < 0.05).
Mechanical properties of PMMA and PMMA/[EE-1H⊂2]·PF6 nanofibers before
and after TEA exposure. (a) Young’s modulus; (b) strain; and
(c) tensile strength. (d) Representative stress/strain curves. Results
are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Bars show statistically
significant differences (P < 0.05).In addition, we find that the photoisomerization
of the azobenzene
end groups by exposure to UV light [namely, performing the (ii) →
(iv) and (iv) → (ii) processes in Figure 1b] does not affect significantly the fiber mechanical properties.
Indeed, as shown in Figure 8 the strain, the
tensile strength and the modulus of [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-based fibers (both taken
in their pristine state and following TEA treatment) remain almost
unaltered after UV irradiation. An interpretation of these observations
on the basis of the properties of the pseudorotaxane and its molecular
components is not straightforward. It can be noticed, however, that
the axle component as well as the resulting ring-threaded species
are considerably more rigid than the PMMA molecules. It may therefore
be argued that fibers in which these dopants are partially aligned
with the host macromolecules could exhibit an increased stiffness,
as observed in this work. Following TEA treatment and ring-axle dethreading,
one also observes that the corresponding stress–strain curve
becomes sublinear (upward triangles in Figure 7d), which suggests that the [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-doped fibers undergo microscopic rearrangements
and eventually plastic flow in their strain-hardening regime. This
is especially interesting since the so obtained Young’s modulus
[(160 ± 20) MPa] is significantly higher than the value found
for fibers embedding the free axle [(100 ± 10) MPa, Figure S7]. Taken together, these results indicate
that a specific increase of stiffness is associated with fibers embedding
dethreaded molecular components. Issues related to the tensile properties
of nanofibers and nanocomposites have been largely investigated for
polymers embedding WS2[58] or
carbon[59−61] nanotubes, whereas the behavior of molecular blends
and their nanostructures is rarely studied. In general, interfacial
shear stresses between different components are at the base of load
transfer to rigid fillers from the plastic matrix, thus determining
improved mechanical properties in nanocomposites. Various mechanisms
can improve load transfer, such as micromechanical interlocking between
the host components and the fillers, chemical bonding, or van der
Waals interactions,[59] and achieving a uniform
dispersion of dopants in the polymer is also needed, as in our case.
In particular, for the fibers studied in this work, dethreaded species
can similarly promote load transfer from the plastic matrix due to
van der Waals effects and correspondingly improved interfacial interactions
between the polymer phase or increasing the volume fraction of the
dispersed component in the composite material, an effect which seems
to take advantage of the presence of the separated axle and ring components. A full rationalization of the molecular details
which lead to the observed mechanical properties will certainly deserve
further investigations.
Figure 8
Mechanical properties of PMMA/[EE-1H⊂2]·PF6 and PMMA/[EE-1H⊂2]·PF6 exposed
to TEA vapors for 2 h, before and after UV exposure. (a) Young’s
modulus; (b) strain; and (c) tensile strength. (d) Representative
stress–strain curves. Results are expressed as mean ±
standard deviation. Bars show statistically significant differences
(P < 0.05).
Mechanical properties of PMMA/[EE-1H⊂2]·PF6 and PMMA/[EE-1H⊂2]·PF6 exposed
to TEA vapors for 2 h, before and after UV exposure. (a) Young’s
modulus; (b) strain; and (c) tensile strength. (d) Representative
stress–strain curves. Results are expressed as mean ±
standard deviation. Bars show statistically significant differences
(P < 0.05).In general, the dependence of the mechanical properties of
polymeric
fibers on the switching of the supramolecular ring-axle interactions[62−64] is a significant step forward toward the exploitation of molecular-scale
phenomena, including molecular movements, to bring about effects at
the macroscopic level. This problem is indeed of the highest importance
for the real world application of molecular devices and machines.[6−8] Materials like those described here are appealing for the development
of sensing components working by chemical and photonic actuation.
Summary
In summary, nanofibers embedding
self-assembled rotaxane-type supramolecular
complexes have been produced via electrospinning. These species are
interesting because they are photoactive (azobenzene E–Z photoisomerization) and responsive to
base–acid stimuli (chemically driven dethreading–rethreading).
The possibility to reversibly interconvert the azobenzene units of
the axle between their E- and Z-forms
in the nanofibers has been assessed as well as the reversible switching
features brought about by dual (optical and chemical) stimulation
of the embedded supramolecular system. Importantly, we demonstrated
the influence of the ring and axle molecular components and of their
dethreading on the macroscopic mechanical properties of fibers. These
results are a step forward toward the incorporation of functional
molecular machines into solid polymeric nanostructures and their exploitation
for the development of innovative devices and materials for photonics,
(bio)chemical sensing, molecular release, and mechanical actuation.
Experimental Section
[EE-1H⊂2]·PF6-Based Nanofibers
Nanofibers are produced by electrospinning
a 10% w/w PMMA (120 kDa)
solution in chloroform (Sigma-Aldrich). The two pseudorotaxane components
are added at a total concentration of 42% w/w compared to PMMA (i.e.,
15 mg of EE-1H·PF6 and
48 mg of 2 in 150 mg of PMMA). Under these conditions
the threaded complex [EE-1H⊂2]·PF6 is quantitatively afforded, as its
stability constant in chloroform is of the order of 106 M–1.[41] [EE-1H]·PF6-based fibers are produced adding
15 mg of EE-1H·PF6 in
PMMA for control mechanical experiments. The electrospinning apparatus
comprises a syringe (1 mL, Hamilton) and a 27 gauge stainless steel
needle connected to a syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus) and a high-voltage
supply (EL60R0.6–22, Glassman High Voltage Inc.). A positive
voltage (5 kV) is applied to the needle. The solution is supplied
at a constant flow rate of 10 μL min–1, and
fibers are collected on Al foils or on quartz coverslips. A copper
plate biased at −6 kV and placed at 10 cm away from the needle
is used as collector. Arrays of uniaxially aligned fibers are produced
by a metallic collector rotating at 2500 rpm. Electrospinning is performed
at ambient conditions (room temperature and relative humidity of about
50%). Fibers are stored at room temperature before analysis. The morphology
and the elemental composition of the pseudorotaxane-embedding fibers
are investigated by a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) system (Nova
NanoSEM 450, FEI) equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer
(Quantax, Bruker). SEM images and elemental data are collected with
an accelerating voltage of 1–5 kV and of 30 kV and with an
aperture size of 30 and 100 μm, respectively.
Photoisomerization
The E → Z photoisomerization
of the azobenzene end groups is induced
by exposure to UV light using the third harmonic of a pulsed Nd:YAG
laser (Spectra Physics λ = 355 nm, repetition rate = 10 Hz,
pulse duration = 10 ns) for 0–20 min. The reversibility of
the azobenzene photoisomerization (i.e., the Z → E conversion) is investigated by exposing samples to blue
laser light (Micro Laser System, Inc.), with incident intensity 1.4
mW/cm2 and λ = 405 nm for different time intervals
(0–10 min). Absorption spectra of the fibers in the spectral
interval 250–400 nm are collected by a UV–vis spectrophotometer
(Cary 300 Scan, Varian Inc.). Polarized FTIR spectroscopy is carried
out using a spectrometer (Spectrum 100, PerkinElmer Inc.) equipped
with an IR grid polarizer (Specac Limited, U.K.), consisting of 0.12
μm-wide Al strips. To this aim, freestanding samples of aligned
fibers are analyzed in transmission mode.
Dethreading/Rethreading
Experiments
In order to induce
the dethreading and rethreading of the ring and axle components, freestanding
nanofibrous mats are exposed to a continuous nitrogen flow carrying
TEA and HCl vapors, respectively. The used system is composed of two
glass flasks connected through pipes. The first vial, containing 10
mL of TEA (or alternatively HCl), is connected to a controlled nitrogen
flow (0.05 L per minute), whereas the second bowl contains the sample.
This is kept in the TEA (HCl) saturated nitrogen flux for variable
exposure times in the range 15 min-4 h and investigated before and
after TEA/HCl treatments by PL spectroscopy. To this aim, the samples
are excited by the fourth harmonic of the Nd:YAG pulsed laser (λ
= 266 nm), and the emission is collected by a quartz optical fiber,
coupled to a monochromator (iHR320, Jobin Yvon) and a charged coupled
device (CCD) detector (Symphony, Jobin Yvon). Since part of the incident
light is diffused by the sample and collected by the optical fiber,
a background spectrum is subtracted from each measured one (see Figure S8). Dethreading and rethreading experiments
are also performed in solution. To this aim, a solution containing EE-1H·PF6 and 2 in 1.5 mL of chloroform is used, and dethreading and rethreading
of the pseudorotaxane components are induced by adding 250 μL
of TEA and HCl, respectively.
Mechanical Measurements
Mechanical properties are determined
using a dynamic mechanical analyzer (DMA Q800, TA Instruments, New
Castle, DE). Each sample made of aligned nanofibers (n = 5 specimens) is cut into a rectangular shape (about 10 ×
8 mm2) before testing, and its thickness is measured using
a digital micrometer (0.04–0.06 mm). Stress–strain curves
are recorded with a ramp/rate of 1 N min–1 (up to
18 N).
Authors: Richard A van Delden; Matthijs K J ter Wiel; Michael M Pollard; Javier Vicario; Nagatoshi Koumura; Ben L Feringa Journal: Nature Date: 2005-10-27 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: David A Leigh; M Angeles F Morales; Emilio M Pérez; Jenny K Y Wong; Carlos G Saiz; Alexandra M Z Slawin; Adrian J Carmichael; David M Haddleton; A Manfred Brouwer; Wybren Jan Buma; George W H Wurpel; Salvador León; Francesco Zerbetto Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2005-05-13 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Meghana V Kakade; Steven Givens; Kenncorwin Gardner; Keun Hyung Lee; D Bruce Chase; John F Rabolt Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2007-02-16 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Alejandro López-Moreno; Belén Nieto-Ortega; Maria Moffa; Alberto de Juan; M Mar Bernal; Juan P Fernández-Blázquez; Juan J Vilatela; Dario Pisignano; Emilio M Pérez Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 15.881