Karoline Mortensen1, Chad Perman2, Jie Chen3. 1. Department of Health Services Administration 3310 School of Public Health Building University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742-2611 301 405-6545. 2. Health Management Associates 1350 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 605 Washington, D.C. 20036 202 785-3669 cperman@healthmanagement.com. 3. Department of Health Services Administration 3310 School of Public Health Building University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742-2611 301 405-9053 jichen@umd.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The state of Maryland implemented innovative budgeting of outpatient and inpatient services in eight rural hospitals under the Total Patient Revenue (TPR) system in July, 2010. METHODS: This paper uses data on Maryland discharges from the 2009-2011 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) State Inpatient Databases (SID). Individual inpatient discharges from eight treatment hospitals and three rural control hospitals (n=374,353) are analyzed. To get robust estimates and control for trends in the state, we also compare treatment hospitals to all hospitals in Maryland that report readmissions (n=1,997,164). Linear probability models using the difference-in-differences approach with hospital fixed effects are estimated to determine the effect of the innovative payment mechanisms on hospital readmissions, controlling for patient demographics and characteristics. RESULTS: Difference-in-differences estimates show that after implementation of TPR in the treatment hospitals, there were no statistically significant changes in the predicted probability of readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Early evidence from the TPR program shows that readmissions were not affected in the 18 months after implementation. IMPLICATIONS: : As the health care system innovates, it is important to evaluate the success of these innovations. One of the goals of TPR was to lower readmission rates, however these rates did not show consistent downward trends after implementation. Our results suggest that payment innovations that provide financial incentives to ensure patients receive care in the most appropriate setting while maintaining quality of care may not have immediate effects on commonly used measures of hospital quality, particularly for rural hospitals that may lack coordinated care delivery infrastructure.
BACKGROUND: The state of Maryland implemented innovative budgeting of outpatient and inpatient services in eight rural hospitals under the Total Patient Revenue (TPR) system in July, 2010. METHODS: This paper uses data on Maryland discharges from the 2009-2011 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) State Inpatient Databases (SID). Individual inpatient discharges from eight treatment hospitals and three rural control hospitals (n=374,353) are analyzed. To get robust estimates and control for trends in the state, we also compare treatment hospitals to all hospitals in Maryland that report readmissions (n=1,997,164). Linear probability models using the difference-in-differences approach with hospital fixed effects are estimated to determine the effect of the innovative payment mechanisms on hospital readmissions, controlling for patient demographics and characteristics. RESULTS: Difference-in-differences estimates show that after implementation of TPR in the treatment hospitals, there were no statistically significant changes in the predicted probability of readmissions. CONCLUSIONS: Early evidence from the TPR program shows that readmissions were not affected in the 18 months after implementation. IMPLICATIONS: : As the health care system innovates, it is important to evaluate the success of these innovations. One of the goals of TPR was to lower readmission rates, however these rates did not show consistent downward trends after implementation. Our results suggest that payment innovations that provide financial incentives to ensure patients receive care in the most appropriate setting while maintaining quality of care may not have immediate effects on commonly used measures of hospital quality, particularly for rural hospitals that may lack coordinated care delivery infrastructure.
Entities:
Keywords:
Maryland; health care reform; hospital readmissions; innovative payment
Authors: Zirui Song; Dana Gelb Safran; Bruce E Landon; Mary Beth Landrum; Yulei He; Robert E Mechanic; Matthew P Day; Michael E Chernew Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2012-07-11 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Eric T Roberts; Laura A Hatfield; J Michael McWilliams; Michael E Chernew; Nicolae Done; Sule Gerovich; Lauren Gilstrap; Ateev Mehrotra Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Eric T Roberts; J Michael McWilliams; Laura A Hatfield; Sule Gerovich; Michael E Chernew; Lauren G Gilstrap; Ateev Mehrotra Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Ai Ren; Bruce Golden; Frank Alt; Edward Wasil; Margret Bjarnadottir; Jon Mark Hirshon; Laura Pimentel Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2019-10-14