Literature DB >> 25264336

Quality of life improvement in patients treated with degarelix versus leuprorelin for advanced prostate cancer.

Dawn Lee1, Sandy Kildegaard Nielsen2, Marjolijn van Keep3, Fredrik Andersson4, Damien Greene5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We used responses to questionnaires included in the CS21 degarelix trial and published mapping algorithms to address the paucity of evidence for health related quality of life in patients with advanced hormone dependent prostate cancer treated with degarelix.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We measured health related quality of life in 610 patients enrolled in the CS21 trial using SF-12® and EORTC QLQ-C30. Based on responses to these questionnaires we estimated patient utility using 4 published mapping algorithms. Utility was tested for relationships with aspects of the symptom and side effect burden that may be affected by degarelix treatment, that is prostate specific antigen progression and adverse events.
RESULTS: Average utility in patients without prostate specific antigen progression or an adverse event was 0.742, similar to previously published utilities for nonprogressed prostate cancer states. Prostate specific antigen progression was associated with a utility decrement of between 0.062 and 0.134 depending on the mapping algorithm used. Of adverse events considered in our analysis musculoskeletal events were associated with the greatest effects on patient utility with a decrement of between 0.029 and 0.086. The 4 mapping algorithms generated similar utility estimates, although values derived from SF-12 were consistently lower than those derived from EORTC QLQ-C30.
CONCLUSIONS: Prostate specific antigen progression status and the incidence of treatment and disease related adverse events result in significant decrements to patient health related quality of life. By slowing prostate specific antigen progression degarelix may improve patient utility and the health related quality of life burden.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cost-benefit analysis; drug therapy; prostatic neoplasms; quality of life; questionnaires

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25264336     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  4 in total

Review 1.  A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials with degarelix versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for advanced prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alessandro Sciarra; Andrea Fasulo; Antonio Ciardi; Elisa Petrangeli; Alessandro Gentilucci; Martina Maggi; Michele Innocenzi; Federico Pierella; Vincenzo Gentile; Stefano Salciccia; Susanna Cattarino
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 2.  Degarelix for treating advanced hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.

Authors:  Friedemann Zengerling; Joachim J Jakob; Stefanie Schmidt; Joerg J Meerpohl; Anette Blümle; Christine Schmucker; Benjamin Mayer; Frank Kunath
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-05

Review 3.  Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists versus standard androgen suppression therapy for advanced prostate cancer A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Frank Kunath; Hendrik Borgmann; Anette Blümle; Bastian Keck; Bernd Wullich; Christine Schmucker; Danijel Sikic; Catharina Roelle; Stefanie Schmidt; Amr Wahba; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Progress in Clinical Research on Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Antagonists for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yi-Fu Liu; Sheng-Qiang Fu; Yu-Chang Yan; Bin-Bin Gong; Wen-Jie Xie; Xiao-Rong Yang; Ting Sun; Ming Ma
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.162

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.