Literature DB >> 25263856

Warning times for species extinctions due to climate change.

Jessica C Stanton1, Kevin T Shoemaker, Richard G Pearson, H Resit Akçakaya.   

Abstract

Climate change is likely to become an increasingly major obstacle to slowing the rate of species extinctions. Several new assessment approaches have been proposed for identifying climate-vulnerable species, based on the assumption that established systems such as the IUCN Red List need revising or replacing because they were not developed to explicitly consider climate change. However, no assessment approach has been tested to determine its ability to provide advanced warning time for conservation action for species that might go extinct due to climate change. To test the performance of the Red List system in this capacity, we used linked niche-demographic models with habitat dynamics driven by a 'business-as-usual' climate change scenario. We generated replicate 100-year trajectories for range-restricted reptiles and amphibians endemic to the United States. For each replicate, we categorized the simulated species according to IUCN Red List criteria at annual, 5-year, and 10-year intervals (the latter representing current practice). For replicates that went extinct, we calculated warning time as the number of years the simulated species was continuously listed in a threatened category prior to extinction. To simulate data limitations, we repeated the analysis using a single criterion at a time (disregarding other listing criteria). Results show that when all criteria can be used, the Red List system would provide several decades of warning time (median = 62 years; >20 years for 99% of replicates), but suggest that conservation actions should begin as soon as a species is listed as Vulnerable, because 50% of replicates went extinct within 20 years of becoming uplisted to Critically Endangered. When only one criterion was used, warning times were substantially shorter, but more frequent assessments increased the warning time by about a decade. Overall, we found that the Red List criteria reliably provide a sensitive and precautionary way to assess extinction risk under climate change.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  IUCN Red List; Red List Categories and Criteria; climate change; linked demographic-habitat models; probability of extinction; threatened species

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25263856     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  8 in total

1.  Clarifying misconceptions of extinction risk assessment with the IUCN Red List.

Authors:  Ben Collen; Nicholas K Dulvy; Kevin J Gaston; Ulf Gärdenfors; David A Keith; André E Punt; Helen M Regan; Monika Böhm; Simon Hedges; Mary Seddon; Stuart H M Butchart; Craig Hilton-Taylor; Michael Hoffmann; Steven P Bachman; H Reşit Akçakaya
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  A framework for near-real time monitoring of diversity patterns based on indirect remote sensing, with an application in the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest.

Authors:  Andrea Paz; Thiago S Silva; Ana C Carnaval
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.061

3.  Parasite biodiversity faces extinction and redistribution in a changing climate.

Authors:  Colin J Carlson; Kevin R Burgio; Eric R Dougherty; Anna J Phillips; Veronica M Bueno; Christopher F Clements; Giovanni Castaldo; Tad A Dallas; Carrie A Cizauskas; Graeme S Cumming; Jorge Doña; Nyeema C Harris; Roger Jovani; Sergey Mironov; Oliver C Muellerklein; Heather C Proctor; Wayne M Getz
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Geography of current and future global mammal extinction risk.

Authors:  Ana D Davidson; Kevin T Shoemaker; Ben Weinstein; Gabriel C Costa; Thomas M Brooks; Gerardo Ceballos; Volker C Radeloff; Carlo Rondinini; Catherine H Graham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Rare inventory of trematode diversity in a protected natural reserve.

Authors:  Jessica Schwelm; Christian Selbach; Jenia Kremers; Bernd Sures
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Process-explicit models reveal the structure and dynamics of biodiversity patterns.

Authors:  Julia A Pilowsky; Robert K Colwell; Carsten Rahbek; Damien A Fordham
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 14.957

7.  Analysing biodiversity and conservation knowledge products to support regional environmental assessments.

Authors:  Thomas M Brooks; H Resit Akçakaya; Neil D Burgess; Stuart H M Butchart; Craig Hilton-Taylor; Michael Hoffmann; Diego Juffe-Bignoli; Naomi Kingston; Brian MacSharry; Mike Parr; Laurence Perianin; Eugenie C Regan; Ana S L Rodrigues; Carlo Rondinini; Yara Shennan-Farpon; Bruce E Young
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 6.444

Review 8.  Conservation in the face of climate change: recent developments.

Authors:  Joshua Lawler; James Watson; Edward Game
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2015-10-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.