Literature DB >> 25263510

Hemodynamic improvement of a LUCAS 2 automated device by addition of an impedance threshold device in a pig model of cardiac arrest.

Guillaume Debaty1, Nicolas Segal2, Tim Matsuura3, Brian Fahey4, Marvin Wayne5, Brian Mahoney6, Ralph Frascone7, Charles Lick8, Demetris Yannopoulos9.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The combination of the LUCAS 2 (L-CPR) automated CPR device and an impedance threshold device (ITD) has been widely implemented in the clinical field. This animal study tested the hypothesis that the addition of an ITD on L-CPR would enhance cerebral and coronary perfusion pressures.
METHODS: Ten female pigs (39.0 ± 2.0 kg) were sedated, intubated, anesthetized with isofluorane, and paralyzed with succinylcholine (93.3 μg/kg/min) to inhibit the potential confounding effect of gasping. After 4 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation, 4 min of L-CPR+an active ITD or L-CPR+a sham ITD was initiated and followed by another 4 min of the alternative method of CPR. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), diastolic right atrial pressure (RAP), intracranial pressure (ICP), airway pressure, and end tidal CO2 (ETCO2) were recorded continuously. Data expressed as mean mmHg ± SD.
RESULTS: Decompression phase airway pressure was significantly lower with L-CPR+active ITD versus L-CPR+sham ITD (-5.3 ± 2.2 vs. -0.5 ± 0.6; p<0.001). L-CPR+active ITD treatment resulted in significantly improved hemodynamics versus L-CPR+sham ITD: ETCO2, 35 ± 6 vs. 29 ± 7 (p=0.015); SBP, 99 ± 9 vs. 93 ± 15 (p=0.050); DBP, 24 ± 12 vs. 19 ± 15 (p=0.006); coronary perfusion pressure, 29 ± 8 vs. 26 ± 7 (p=0.004) and cerebral perfusion pressure, 24 ± 13 vs. 21 ± 12 (p=0.028).
CONCLUSIONS: In pigs undergoing L-CPR the addition of the active ITD significantly reduced intrathoracic pressure and increased vital organ perfusion pressures.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); Impedance threshold device; Mechanical CPR

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25263510     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.09.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  3 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing cardiac arrest survival with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: insights into the process of death.

Authors:  Tom P Aufderheide; Rajat Kalra; Marinos Kosmopoulos; Jason A Bartos; Demetris Yannopoulos
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Four ways to ventilate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model: a randomized study.

Authors:  Benedict Kjærgaard; Egidijus Bavarskis; Sigridur Olga Magnusdottir; Charlotte Runge; Daiva Erentaite; Jes Sefland Vogt; Mette Dahl Bendtsen
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  An impedance threshold device did not improve carotid blood flow in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest.

Authors:  Benedict Kjaergaard; Hans O Holdgaard; Sigridur O Magnusdottir; Søren Lundbye-Christensen; Erika F Christensen
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 5.531

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.