Literature DB >> 25263506

Detection of mitotic figures and G2+ tumor nuclei with histone markers correlates with worse overall survival in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma.

Samuel A Henderson1, Michael T Tetzlaff, Penvadee Pattanaprichakul, Patricia Fox, Carlos A Torres-Cabala, Roland L Bassett, Victor G Prieto, Hunter W Richards, Jonathan L Curry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High mitotic figure count (MFC) correlates with low survival rate in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). However, the prognostic impact of histone biomarkers as surrogates of MFC in MCC is unknown. We evaluated the prognostic significance of the immunodetection of mitotic figures and of G2+ tumor nuclei with histone-associated mitotic markers H3K79me3T80ph (H3KT) and phosphohistone H3 (PHH3) in MCC.
METHODS: Immunohistochemical analyses of H3KT and PHH3 and proliferative marker Ki-67 were performed in a series of 21 cases of MCC. The significance of the pathologic data and immunoreactivity with these markers was evaluated with Pearson correlation and paired Student t-test. Univariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to assess the relationships between these markers and survival.
RESULTS: H3KT detected a higher number of mitotic figure (p<0.0001) and G2+ tumor nuclei (p<0.0052) than did PHH3. Furthermore, the MFC combined with G2+ tumor nuclei detected with H3KT compared to PHH3 and manual MFC was a significant predictor of impaired survival in patients with MCC (p=0.035; HR=1.0172), corresponding to a 1.72% increased risk of death for each unit increase in H3KT.
CONCLUSIONS: Biomarker analysis of proliferative rates with histone markers may have relevance in stratifying risk in patients with MCC.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  H3K79me3T80ph; Merkel cell carcinoma; PHH3; biomarker; histones

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25263506      PMCID: PMC4522694          DOI: 10.1111/cup.12383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cutan Pathol        ISSN: 0303-6987            Impact factor:   1.587


  35 in total

Review 1.  Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  D G Coit
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Pathologic nodal evaluation improves prognostic accuracy in Merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 5823 cases as the basis of the first consensus staging system.

Authors:  Bianca D Lemos; Barry E Storer; Jayasri G Iyer; Jerri Linn Phillips; Christopher K Bichakjian; L Christine Fang; Timothy M Johnson; Nanette J Liegeois-Kwon; Clark C Otley; Kelly G Paulson; Merrick I Ross; Siegrid S Yu; Nathalie C Zeitouni; David R Byrd; Vernon K Sondak; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Arthur J Sober; Paul Nghiem
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2010-06-19       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Expression profiles associated with aggressive behavior in Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  María-Teresa Fernández-Figueras; Lluís Puig; Eva Musulén; Montserrat Gilaberte; Enrique Lerma; Sergio Serrano; Carlos Ferrándiz; Aurelio Ariza
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 7.842

4.  Support for p63 expression as an adverse prognostic marker in Merkel cell carcinoma: report on a Canadian cohort.

Authors:  Kirsten E Fleming; Thai Yen Ly; Sylvia Pasternak; Marek Godlewski; Steve Doucette; Noreen M Walsh
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.466

5.  Expression of p63 is the sole independent marker of aggressiveness in localised (stage I-II) Merkel cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Sofia Asioli; Alberto Righi; Dario de Biase; Luca Morandi; Virginia Caliendo; Franco Picciotto; Giuseppe Macripò; Francesca Maletta; Ludovica Verdun di Cantogno; Luigi Chiusa; Vincenzo Eusebi; Gianni Bussolati
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Clonal integration of a polyomavirus in human Merkel cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Huichen Feng; Masahiro Shuda; Yuan Chang; Patrick S Moore
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Comparison of the effect of different techniques for measurement of Ki67 proliferation on reproducibility and prognosis prediction accuracy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Einar Gudlaugsson; Ivar Skaland; Emiel A M Janssen; Rune Smaaland; Zhiming Shao; Anais Malpica; Feja Voorhorst; Jan P A Baak
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Prognostic factors in Merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of 240 cases.

Authors:  Tina I Tarantola; Laura A Vallow; Michele Y Halyard; Roger H Weenig; Karen E Warschaw; Travis E Grotz; James W Jakub; Randall K Roenigk; Jerry D Brewer; Amy L Weaver; Clark C Otley
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 11.527

9.  Merkel cell carcinoma: histologic features and prognosis.

Authors:  Aleodor A Andea; Daniel G Coit; Bijal Amin; Klaus J Busam
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Mitotic phosphorylation of histone H3 threonine 80.

Authors:  Sharra L Hammond; Stephanie D Byrum; Sarita Namjoshi; Hillary K Graves; Briana K Dennehey; Alan J Tackett; Jessica K Tyler
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 4.534

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Update on Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael T Tetzlaff; Priyadharsini Nagarajan
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2018-03-20

2.  Merkel Cell Carcinoma, Version 1.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Christopher K Bichakjian; Thomas Olencki; Sumaira Z Aasi; Murad Alam; James S Andersen; Rachel Blitzblau; Glen M Bowen; Carlo M Contreras; Gregory A Daniels; Roy Decker; Jeffrey M Farma; Kris Fisher; Brian Gastman; Karthik Ghosh; Roy C Grekin; Kenneth Grossman; Alan L Ho; Karl D Lewis; Manisha Loss; Daniel D Lydiatt; Jane Messina; Kishwer S Nehal; Paul Nghiem; Igor Puzanov; Chrysalyne D Schmults; Ashok R Shaha; Valencia Thomas; Yaohui G Xu; John A Zic; Karin G Hoffmann; Anita M Engh
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 12.693

Review 3.  Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck: pathogenesis, current and emerging treatment options.

Authors:  Alok T Saini; Brett A Miles
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Emerging clinical applications of selected biomarkers in melanoma.

Authors:  Michael T Tetzlaff; Carlos A Torres-Cabala; Penvadee Pattanaprichakul; Ronald P Rapini; Victor G Prieto; Jonathan L Curry
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2015-01-30

5.  Molecular Profiling of Merkel Cell Polyomavirus-Associated Merkel Cell Carcinoma and Cutaneous Melanoma.

Authors:  Attila Mokánszki; Gábor Méhes; Szilvia Lilla Csoma; Sándor Kollár; Yi-Che Chang Chien
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-01

Review 6.  Epigenetic Dysregulations in Merkel Cell Polyomavirus-Driven Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  John Charles Rotondo; Chiara Mazziotta; Carmen Lanzillotti; Mauro Tognon; Fernanda Martini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  The Role of Histone Post-Translational Modifications in Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Chiara Mazziotta; Carmen Lanzillotti; Roberta Gafà; Antoine Touzé; Marie-Alice Durand; Fernanda Martini; John Charles Rotondo
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Quantitative proteome analysis of Merkel cell carcinoma cell lines using SILAC.

Authors:  Ulana Kotowski; Boban M Erović; Julia Schnöll; Victoria Stanek; Stefan Janik; Martin Steurer; Goran Mitulović
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.988

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.