Literature DB >> 25263396

The development of scientific thinking in elementary school: a comprehensive inventory.

Susanne Koerber1, Daniela Mayer, Christopher Osterhaus, Knut Schwippert, Beate Sodian.   

Abstract

The development of scientific thinking was assessed in 1,581 second, third, and fourth graders (8-, 9-, 10-year-olds) based on a conceptual model that posits developmental progression from naïve to more advanced conceptions. Using a 66-item scale, five components of scientific thinking were addressed, including experimental design, data interpretation, and understanding the nature of science. Unidimensional and multidimensional item response theory analyses supported the instrument's reliability and validity and suggested that the multiple components of scientific thinking form a unitary construct, independent of verbal or reasoning skills. A partial credit model gave evidence for a hierarchical developmental progression. Across each grade transition, advanced conceptions increased while naïve conceptions decreased. Independent effects of intelligence, schooling, and parental education on scientific thinking are discussed.
© 2014 The Authors. Child Development © 2014 Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25263396     DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  4 in total

1.  Editorial: Novel Approaches to Teaching Scientific Thinking: Psychological Perspectives.

Authors:  Rodney M Schmaltz; Scott O Lilienfeld
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-05-18

2.  Redefining Critical Thinking: Teaching Students to Think like Scientists.

Authors:  Rodney M Schmaltz; Erik Jansen; Nicole Wenckowski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-03-29

3.  Theory of Mind, Personal Epistemology, and Science Learning: Exploring Common Conceptual Components.

Authors:  Natassa Kyriakopoulou; Stella Vosniadou
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-06-12

4.  Individual Differences in Children's Development of Scientific Reasoning Through Inquiry-Based Instruction: Who Needs Additional Guidance?

Authors:  Erika Schlatter; Inge Molenaar; Ard W Lazonder
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-05-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.