Literature DB >> 25263262

Structural brain differences in alcohol-dependent individuals with and without comorbid substance dependence.

Anderson Mon1, Timothy C Durazzo2, Christoph Abe3, Stefan Gazdzinski4, David Pennington5, Thomas Schmidt6, Dieter J Meyerhoff2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over 50% of individuals with alcohol use disorders (AUD) also use other substances; brain structural abnormalities observed in alcohol dependent individuals may not be entirely related to alcohol consumption. This MRI study assessed differences in brain regional tissue volumes between short-term abstinent alcohol dependent individuals without (ALC) and with current substance use dependence (polysubstance users, PSU).
METHODS: Nineteen, one-month-abstinent PSU and 40 ALC as well as 27 light-drinkers (LD) were studied on a 1.5 T MR system. Whole brain T1-weighted images were segmented automatically into regional gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) volumes. MANOVA assessed group differences of intracranial volume-normalized tissue volumes of the frontal, parietal, occipital, and temporal lobes and regional subcortical GM volumes. The volumetric measures were correlated with neurocognitive measures to assess their functional relevance.
RESULTS: Despite similar lifetime drinking and smoking histories, PSU had significantly larger normalized WM volumes than ALC in all lobes. PSU also had larger frontal and parietal WM volumes than LD, but smaller temporal GM volumes and smaller lenticular and thalamic nuclei than LD. ALC had smaller frontal, parietal, and temporal GM, thalamic GM and cerebellar volumes than LD. ALC had more sulcal CSF volumes than both PSU and LD.
CONCLUSION: One-month-abstinent ALC and PSU exhibited different patterns of gross brain structural abnormalities. The larger lobar WM volumes in PSU in the absence of widespread GM volume loss contrast with widespread GM atrophy in ALC. These structural differences may demand different treatment approaches to mitigate specific functionally relevant brain abnormalities.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alcohol use disorder; Brain structure; MRI; Neurocognition; Polysubstance use disorder; Substance use disorder

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25263262      PMCID: PMC4280666          DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend        ISSN: 0376-8716            Impact factor:   4.492


  58 in total

1.  Cognitive functioning and length of abstinence in polysubstance dependent men.

Authors:  Krista Lisdahl Medina; Paula K Shear; John Schafer; Tisha Gangopadhyay Armstrong; Patrick Dyer
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.813

2.  Lack of hippocampal volume change in long-term heavy cannabis users.

Authors:  Golfo K Tzilos; Christina B Cintron; Jonas B R Wood; Norah S Simpson; Ashley D Young; Harrison G Pope; Deborah A Yurgelun-Todd
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

3.  Higher volume of ventral striatum and right prefrontal cortex in pathological gambling.

Authors:  Saskia Koehler; Eva Hasselmann; Torsten Wüstenberg; Andreas Heinz; Nina Romanczuk-Seiferth
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  Reliability of alcohol use indices. The Lifetime Drinking History and the MAST.

Authors:  H A Skinner; W J Sheu
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol       Date:  1982-11

5.  Sub-diagnostic psychiatric comorbidity in alcoholics.

Authors:  George Fein; Victoria Di Sclafani; Peter Finn; Diane L Scheiner
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Smaller volume of prefrontal lobe in polysubstance abusers: a magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  X Liu; J A Matochik; J L Cadet; E D London
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  A comprehensive assessment of neurocognition in middle-aged chronic cigarette smokers.

Authors:  Timothy C Durazzo; Dieter J Meyerhoff; Sara Jo Nixon
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Measures of learning, memory and processing speed accurately predict smoking status in short-term abstinent treatment-seeking alcohol-dependent individuals.

Authors:  Timothy C Durazzo; Susanna L Fryer; Johannes C Rothlind; Mary Vertinski; Stefan Gazdzinski; Anderson Mon; Dieter J Meyerhoff
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 2.826

9.  Prefrontal cortex morphometry in abstinent adolescent marijuana users: subtle gender effects.

Authors:  Krista Lisdahl Medina; Tim McQueeny; Bonnie J Nagel; Karen L Hanson; Tony T Yang; Susan F Tapert
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.280

10.  Abnormal structure of frontostriatal brain systems is associated with aspects of impulsivity and compulsivity in cocaine dependence.

Authors:  Karen D Ersche; Anna Barnes; P Simon Jones; Sharon Morein-Zamir; Trevor W Robbins; Edward T Bullmore
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  17 in total

1.  Structural Neuroimaging in Polysubstance Users.

Authors:  Dieter J Meyerhoff
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2017-02

2.  An endophenotype approach to the genetics of alcohol dependence: a genome wide association study of fast beta EEG in families of African ancestry.

Authors:  J L Meyers; J Zhang; J C Wang; J Su; S I Kuo; M Kapoor; L Wetherill; S Bertelsen; D Lai; J E Salvatore; C Kamarajan; D Chorlian; A Agrawal; L Almasy; L Bauer; K K Bucholz; G Chan; V Hesselbrock; L Koganti; J Kramer; S Kuperman; N Manz; A Pandey; M Seay; D Scott; R E Taylor; D M Dick; H J Edenberg; A Goate; T Foroud; B Porjesz
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 15.992

Review 3.  Immune activation and neuroinflammation in alcohol use and HIV infection: evidence for shared mechanisms.

Authors:  Mollie A Monnig
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.829

Review 4.  The thalamus in drug addiction: from rodents to humans.

Authors:  Anna S Huang; Jameson A Mitchell; Suzanne N Haber; Nelly Alia-Klein; Rita Z Goldstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Brain perfusion in polysubstance users: relationship to substance and tobacco use, cognition, and self-regulation.

Authors:  Donna E Murray; Timothy C Durazzo; Anderson Mon; Thomas P Schmidt; Dieter J Meyerhoff
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 4.492

6.  Memory impairment in alcohol use disorder is associated with regional frontal brain volumes.

Authors:  Rosemary Fama; Anne-Pascale Le Berre; Stephanie A Sassoon; Natalie M Zahr; Kilian M Pohl; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Edith V Sullivan
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Neurocognition and inhibitory control in polysubstance use disorders: Comparison with alcohol use disorders and changes with abstinence.

Authors:  Thomas P Schmidt; David L Pennington; Stephanie L Cardoos; Timothy C Durazzo; Dieter J Meyerhoff
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.475

8.  Decreased subcortical volumes in alcohol dependent individuals: effect of polysubstance use disorder.

Authors:  Erica N Grodin; Reza Momenan
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.280

9.  Volumetric brain abnormalities in polysubstance use disorder patients.

Authors:  Cemal Onur Noyan; Samet Kose; Serdar Nurmedov; Baris Metin; Aslı Enez Darcin; Nesrin Dilbaz
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 2.570

10.  Evaluating effects of sex and age on white matter microstructural alterations in alcohol use disorder: A diffusion tensor imaging study.

Authors:  Mallory A Kisner; Lauren Sussman; Thushini Manuweera; Erica N Grodin; Samantha J Fede; Joelle E Sarlls; Reza Momenan
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 3.928

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.