Literature DB >> 25263177

The presence of anti-endomysial antibodies and the level of anti-tissue transglutaminases can be used to diagnose adult coeliac disease without duodenal biopsy.

R Tortora1, N Imperatore, P Capone, G D De Palma, G De Stefano, N Gerbino, N Caporaso, A Rispo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The new ESPGHAN guidelines for diagnosis of paediatric coeliac disease suggest to avoid biopsy in genetically pre-disposed and symptomatic individuals with positive anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA) and anti-tissue transglutaminases (a-tTG). However, duodenal biopsy remains the gold standard in adult coeliac disease. AIMS: To establish the cut-off values of a-tTG, which would: predict the presence of duodenal histology (Marsh ≥2) diagnostic for coeliac disease; and predict the presence of villous atrophy (Marsh 3) in adults.
METHODS: We performed an observational prospective study including all consecutive adult patients with suspected coeliac disease. All subjects were tested for EMA and a-tTG. Coeliac disease diagnosis was made in presence of Marsh ≥2, a-tTG >7 U/mL and positive EMA. A ROC curve was constructed to establish the best specificity cut-off of a-tTG levels, which would predict the presence of Marsh ≥2 and Marsh 3 at histology.
RESULTS: The study included 310 patients with positive antibodies. Histology showed Marsh 1 in 8.7%, Marsh 2 in 3.5%, Marsh 3 in 87.7%. The best cut-off value of a-tTG for predicting Marsh ≥2 was 45 U/mL (sensitivity 70%; specificity 100%; PPV 100%; NPV 24.1%); the best cut-off for predicting villous atrophy was 62.4 U/mL (sensitivity 69%, specificity 100%; PPV 100%; NPV 31%).
CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of coeliac disease can be reached without histology in adult patients with positive EMA and a-tTG levels >45 U/mL. An a-tTG level >62.4 was diagnostic for villous atrophy. These results could contribute to improving the diagnosis of coeliac disease by allowing for a significant reduction in diagnosis-related costs.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25263177     DOI: 10.1111/apt.12970

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  18 in total

1.  Should ESPGHAN guidelines for serologic diagnosis of celiac disease be used in adults? A prospective analysis in an adult patient cohort with high pretest probability.

Authors:  Emilia Sugai; Hui J Hwang; Horacio Vázquez; María L Moreno; Florencia Costa; Gabriela Longarini; María I Pinto-Sánchez; Sonia Niveloni; Edgardo Smecuol; Roberto M Mazure; Elena F Verdu; Eduardo Mauriño; Julio C Bai
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Celiac disease: from etiological factors to evolving diagnostic approaches.

Authors:  Anantdeep Kaur; Olga Shimoni; Michael Wallach
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 7.527

3.  Application of the Biopsy-Sparing ESPGHAN Guidelines for Celiac Disease Diagnosis in Adults: A Real-Life Study.

Authors:  Konstantinos Efthymakis; Mariaelena Serio; Angelo Milano; Francesco Laterza; Antonella Bonitatibus; Marta Di Nicola; Matteo Neri
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Prevalence estimation of celiac disease in the general adult population of Latvia using serology and HLA genotyping.

Authors:  Marcis Leja; Zakera Shums; Liene Nikitina-Zake; Mikus Gavars; Ilze Kikuste; Jay Milo; Ilva Daugule; Jelena Pahomova; Valdis Pirags; Vilnis Dzerve; Janis Klovins; Andrejs Erglis; Gary L Norman
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.623

5.  Identification of a serum transglutaminase threshold value for the noninvasive diagnosis of symptomatic adult celiac disease patients: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Marco Di Tola; Mariacatia Marino; Simone Goetze; Rossella Casale; Sara Di Nardi; Raffaele Borghini; Giuseppe Donato; Antonio Tiberti; Antonio Picarelli
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 7.527

6.  Comparison of non-invasive tests with invasive tests in the diagnosis of celiac disease.

Authors:  Yasemin Derya Gülseren; Ali Kudret Adiloğlu; Mihriban Yücel; Zuhal Dağ; Nilnur Eyerci; Rukiye Berkem; Levent Filik; Muzaffer Çaydere
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Are ESPGHAN "biopsy-sparing" guidelines for celiac disease also suitable for asymptomatic patients?

Authors:  Chiara Maria Trovato; Monica Montuori; Caterina Anania; Maria Barbato; Anna Rita Vestri; Sofia Guida; Salvatore Oliva; Fabrizio Mainiero; Salvatore Cucchiara; Francesco Valitutti
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  Coeliac disease and autoimmune disease-genetic overlap and screening.

Authors:  Knut E A Lundin; Cisca Wijmenga
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 9.  Coeliac disease: to biopsy or not?

Authors:  Norelle R Reilly; Steffen Husby; David S Sanders; Peter H R Green
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 10.  The Role of Gastrointestinal-Related Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins as Biomarkers in Gastrointestinal Diseases.

Authors:  Shaun S C Ho; Jacqueline I Keenan; Andrew S Day
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.