BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), also known as glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCPII), is generally recognized as a diagnostic and therapeutic cancer antigen and a molecular address for targeted imaging and drug delivery studies. Due to its significance in cancer research, numerous monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against GCPII have been described and marketed in the past decades. Unfortunately, some of these mAbs are poorly characterized, which might lead to their inappropriate use and misinterpretation of the acquired results. METHODS: We collected the 13 most frequently used mAbs against GCPII and quantitatively characterized their binding to GCPII by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Using a peptide library, we mapped epitopes recognized by a given mAb. Finally, we assessed the applicability of these mAbs to routine experimental setups, including Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry. RESULTS: ELISA and SPR analyses revealed that mAbs J591, J415, D2B, 107-1A4, GCP-05, and 2G7 bind preferentially to GCPII in native form, while mAbs YPSMA-1, YPSMA-2, GCP-02, GCP-04, and 3E6 bind solely to denatured GCPII. mAbs 24.4E6 and 7E11-C5.3 recognize both forms of GCPII. Additionally, we determined that GCP-02 and 3E6 cross-react with mouse GCPII, while GCP-04 recognizes GCPII and GCPIII proteins from both human and mouse. CONCLUSION: This comparative analysis provides the first detailed quantitative characterization of the most commonly used mAbs against GCPII and can serve as a guideline for the scientific community to use them in a proper and efficient way.
BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), also known as glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCPII), is generally recognized as a diagnostic and therapeutic cancer antigen and a molecular address for targeted imaging and drug delivery studies. Due to its significance in cancer research, numerous monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against GCPII have been described and marketed in the past decades. Unfortunately, some of these mAbs are poorly characterized, which might lead to their inappropriate use and misinterpretation of the acquired results. METHODS: We collected the 13 most frequently used mAbs against GCPII and quantitatively characterized their binding to GCPII by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and surface plasmon resonance (SPR). Using a peptide library, we mapped epitopes recognized by a given mAb. Finally, we assessed the applicability of these mAbs to routine experimental setups, including Western blotting, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry. RESULTS: ELISA and SPR analyses revealed that mAbs J591, J415, D2B, 107-1A4, GCP-05, and 2G7 bind preferentially to GCPII in native form, while mAbs YPSMA-1, YPSMA-2, GCP-02, GCP-04, and 3E6 bind solely to denatured GCPII. mAbs 24.4E6 and 7E11-C5.3 recognize both forms of GCPII. Additionally, we determined that GCP-02 and 3E6 cross-react with mouseGCPII, while GCP-04 recognizes GCPII and GCPIII proteins from both human and mouse. CONCLUSION: This comparative analysis provides the first detailed quantitative characterization of the most commonly used mAbs against GCPII and can serve as a guideline for the scientific community to use them in a proper and efficient way.
Authors: C Gasch; C Düwel; K Kopka; C Kratochwil; M Vinsensia; M Eiber; T Maurer; U Haberkorn; B Hadaschik; F L Giesel Journal: Urologe A Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 0.639
Authors: Aimen Zlitni; Melissa Yin; Nancy Janzen; Samit Chatterjee; Ala Lisok; Kathleen L Gabrielson; Sridhar Nimmagadda; Martin G Pomper; F Stuart Foster; John F Valliant Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Tomáš Knedlík; Barbora Vorlová; Václav Navrátil; Jan Tykvart; František Sedlák; Šimon Vaculín; Miloslav Franěk; Pavel Šácha; Jan Konvalinka Journal: FEBS Open Bio Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 2.693
Authors: Václav Navrátil; Jiří Schimer; Jan Tykvart; Tomáš Knedlík; Viktor Vik; Pavel Majer; Jan Konvalinka; Pavel Šácha Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 16.971