Literature DB >> 25262259

PA32540 (a coordinated-delivery tablet of enteric-coated aspirin 325 mg and immediate-release omeprazole 40 mg) versus enteric-coated aspirin 325 mg alone in subjects at risk for aspirin-associated gastric ulcers: results of two 6-month, phase 3 studies.

David J Whellan1, Jay L Goldstein2, Byron L Cryer3, Glenn M Eisen4, Angel Lanas5, Alan B Miller6, James M Scheiman7, John G Fort8, Ying Zhang8, Christopher O'Connor9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Discontinuations and/or interruptions in aspirin therapy for secondary cardioprotection due to upper gastrointestinal (UGI) complications or symptoms have been shown to increase the risk for subsequent cardiovascular events. PA32540 is a coordinated-delivery, combination tablet consisting of enteric-coated aspirin (EC-ASA) 325 mg and immediate-release (IR) omeprazole 40 mg.
METHODS: Two identically-designed, 6-month, randomized, double-blind trials evaluated PA32540 vs. EC-ASA 325 mg in a secondary cardiovascular disease prevention population taking aspirin 325 mg daily for ≥3 months and at risk for ASA-associated gastric ulcers (GUs). The combined study population was 1049 subjects (524 randomized to PA32540, 525 to EC-ASA 325 mg). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of endoscopically-determined gastric ulceration over 6 months. Safety outcomes included the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and UGI symptoms.
RESULTS: Significantly fewer PA32540-treated subjects (3.2%) developed endoscopic GUs vs. EC-ASA 325 mg-treated subjects (8.6%) (P < .001). Overall occurrence of MACE was low (2.1%), with no significant differences between treatments in types or incidence of MACE. PA32540-treated subjects had significantly fewer UGI symptoms (P < .001) and significantly fewer discontinuations due to pre-specified UGI adverse events (1.5% vs. 8.2%, respectively; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: PA32540 reduced the incidence of endoscopic GUs compared to EC-ASA 325 mg, but with a similar cardiovascular event profile. Due to fewer UGI symptoms, continuation on aspirin therapy was greater in the PA32540 treatment arm.
Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25262259     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  7 in total

1.  Antithrombotic Treatments in Patients with Chronic Coronary Artery Disease or Peripheral Artery Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Rupert Bauersachs; Olivia Wu; Jean-Baptiste Briere; Kevin Bowrin; Katarzyna Borkowska; Anna Jakubowska; Vanessa Taieb; Mondher Toumi; Maria Huelsebeck
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.023

2.  Long-Term Safety of a Coordinated Delivery Tablet of Enteric-Coated Aspirin 325 mg and Immediate-Release Omeprazole 40 mg for Secondary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Patients at GI Risk.

Authors:  Jay L Goldstein; David J Whellan; James M Scheiman; Byron L Cryer; Glenn M Eisen; Angel Lanas; John G Fort
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.023

Review 3.  Enteric-Coated Aspirin and the Risk of Gastrointestinal Side Effects: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Hanan Muzeyin Kedir; Eskinder Ayalew Sisay; Alfoalem Araba Abiye
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-08-24

Review 4.  The Safety of Long-Term Proton Pump Inhibitor Use on Cardiovascular Health: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dalel Jeridi; Anna Pellat; Claire Ginestet; Antoine Assaf; Rachel Hallit; Felix Corre; Romain Coriat
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 5.  PA32540 for the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients at risk for aspirin-associated gastric ulcers.

Authors:  Danielle Duffy; Bridget Rooney; Suzanne Adams; David J Whellan
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2014-10-10

Review 6.  Clinical Guidelines for Drug-Related Peptic Ulcer, 2020 Revised Edition.

Authors:  Moon Kyung Joo; Chan Hyuk Park; Joon Sung Kim; Jae Myung Park; Ji Yong Ahn; Bong Eun Lee; Jeong Hoon Lee; Hyo-Joon Yang; Yu Kyung Cho; Chang Seok Bang; Beom Jin Kim; Hye-Kyung Jung; Byung-Wook Kim; Yong Chan Lee
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 4.519

7.  Efficacy and safety of alogliptin versus acarbose in Chinese type 2 diabetes patients with high cardiovascular risk or coronary heart disease treated with aspirin and inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy or drug-naive: A multicentre, randomized, open-label, prospective study (ACADEMIC).

Authors:  Bin Gao; Weiguo Gao; Hailong Wan; Fengmei Xu; Rong Zhou; Xia Zhang; Qiuhe Ji
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 6.408

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.