Alberto M Ortega Hinojosa1, Molly M Davies2, Sarah Jarjour2, Richard T Burnett3, Jennifer K Mann2, Edward Hughes4, John R Balmes5, Michelle C Turner6, Michael Jerrett2. 1. University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, 50 University Hall MC7360 Mail Drop, Berkeley, CA 94720-7360, United States. Electronic address: alberto.ortega@berkeley.edu. 2. University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, 50 University Hall MC7360 Mail Drop, Berkeley, CA 94720-7360, United States. 3. Health Canada, Population Studies Division, Environmental Health Sciences and Research Bureau, Environmental and Radiation Health Sciences Directorate, Healthy Environment and Consumer Safety Branch, Room 134, Environmental Health Center, 50 Columbine Driveway, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 0K9. 4. Edward Hughes Consulting, 350 Queen Elizabeth Dr., #102, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 3N1. 5. University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, Division of Environmental Health Sciences, 50 University Hall MC7360 Mail Drop, Berkeley, CA 94720-7360, United States; University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine, 1001 Potrero Ave, SFGH 30, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States. 6. McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment, University of Ottawa, 1 Stewart Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1N 6N5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Globally and in the United States, smoking and obesity are leading causes of death and disability. Reliable estimates of prevalence for these risk factors are often missing variables in public health surveillance programs. This may limit the capacity of public health surveillance to target interventions or to assess associations between other environmental risk factors (e.g., air pollution) and health because smoking and obesity are often important confounders. OBJECTIVES: To generate prevalence estimates of smoking and obesity rates over small areas for the United States (i.e., at the ZIP code and census tract levels). METHODS: We predicted smoking and obesity prevalence using a combined approach first using a lasso-based variable selection procedure followed by a two-level random effects regression with a Poisson link clustered on state and county. We used data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) from 1991 to 2010 to estimate the model. We used 10-fold cross-validated mean squared errors and the variance of the residuals to test our model. To downscale the estimates we combined the prediction equations with 1990 and 2000 U.S. Census data for each of the four five-year time periods in this time range at the ZIP code and census tract levels. Several sensitivity analyses were conducted using models that included only basic terms, that accounted for spatial autocorrelation, and used Generalized Linear Models that did not include random effects. RESULTS: The two-level random effects model produced improved estimates compared to the fixed effects-only models. Estimates were particularly improved for the two-thirds of the conterminous U.S. where BRFSS data were available to estimate the county level random effects. We downscaled the smoking and obesity rate predictions to derive ZIP code and census tract estimates. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge these smoking and obesity predictions are the first to be developed for the entire conterminous U.S. for census tracts and ZIP codes. Our estimates could have significant utility for public health surveillance.
BACKGROUND: Globally and in the United States, smoking and obesity are leading causes of death and disability. Reliable estimates of prevalence for these risk factors are often missing variables in public health surveillance programs. This may limit the capacity of public health surveillance to target interventions or to assess associations between other environmental risk factors (e.g., air pollution) and health because smoking and obesity are often important confounders. OBJECTIVES: To generate prevalence estimates of smoking and obesity rates over small areas for the United States (i.e., at the ZIP code and census tract levels). METHODS: We predicted smoking and obesity prevalence using a combined approach first using a lasso-based variable selection procedure followed by a two-level random effects regression with a Poisson link clustered on state and county. We used data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) from 1991 to 2010 to estimate the model. We used 10-fold cross-validated mean squared errors and the variance of the residuals to test our model. To downscale the estimates we combined the prediction equations with 1990 and 2000 U.S. Census data for each of the four five-year time periods in this time range at the ZIP code and census tract levels. Several sensitivity analyses were conducted using models that included only basic terms, that accounted for spatial autocorrelation, and used Generalized Linear Models that did not include random effects. RESULTS: The two-level random effects model produced improved estimates compared to the fixed effects-only models. Estimates were particularly improved for the two-thirds of the conterminous U.S. where BRFSS data were available to estimate the county level random effects. We downscaled the smoking and obesity rate predictions to derive ZIP code and census tract estimates. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge these smoking and obesity predictions are the first to be developed for the entire conterminous U.S. for census tracts and ZIP codes. Our estimates could have significant utility for public health surveillance.
Authors: Matilda van den Bosch; Michael Brauer; Rick Burnett; Hugh W Davies; Zoe Davis; Martin Guhn; Ingrid Jarvis; Lorien Nesbitt; Tim Oberlander; Emily Rugel; Hind Sbihi; Jason G Su; Michael Jerrett Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Raphael D Isokpehi; Matilda O Johnson; Bryanna Campos; Arianna Sanders; Thometta Cozart; Idethia S Harvey Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-02-16 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Maria Dyah Kurniasari; Ferry Fredy Karwur; Rosiana Eva Rayanti; Edi Dharmana; Yohanes Andy Rias; Kuei Ru Chou; Hsiu-Ting Tsai Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Anja Zgodic; Jan M Eberth; Charity B Breneman; Marilyn E Wende; Andrew T Kaczynski; Angela D Liese; Alexander C McLain Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2021-12-01 Impact factor: 5.363
Authors: Robert J Blount; Lisa Pascopella; Donald G Catanzaro; Pennan M Barry; Paul B English; Mark R Segal; Jennifer Flood; Dan Meltzer; Brenda Jones; John Balmes; Payam Nahid Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Holly L Richmond; Joana Tome; Haresh Rochani; Isaac Chun-Hai Fung; Gulzar H Shah; Jessica S Schwind Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-31 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Nkiruka C Atuegwu; Cheryl Oncken; Reinhard C Laubenbacher; Mario F Perez; Eric M Mortensen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-05 Impact factor: 3.390