Literature DB >> 25261806

A population based study of the changing demographics of patients undergoing definitive treatment for kidney stone disease.

Michael Ordon1, David Urbach2, Muhammad Mamdani3, Refik Saskin4, R John D'A Honey5, Kenneth T Pace5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined temporal changes in the demographics of patients undergoing definitive treatment for kidney stones during a 20-year period in Ontario, Canada.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the Ontario Health Insurance Plan physician claims database and the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database we performed a population based cross-sectional time series analysis by identifying all kidney stone treatments done between July 1, 1991 and December 31, 2010. The demographics assessed were patient gender, age and socioeconomic status. The rate and/or proportion of kidney stone treatments per strata of these demographics were calculated for each 1-year block of the study period. We used time series analysis with exponential smoothing and autoregressive integrated moving average models to assess for trends with time.
RESULTS: We identified 116,115 patients who underwent treatment for kidney stones during the study period. The rate of stone procedures performed per year increased steadily from 85/100,000 to 126/100,000 population. With time the rate of females who were treated increased significantly from 40/100,000 to 53/100,000 (p <0.0001). In contrast, the rate of males who were treated remained stable, increasing from 82/100,000 to 83/100,000 (p = 0.11). In regard to age the rate of patients older than 64 years increased significantly with time from 67/100,000 to 89/100,000 (p <0.0001). In regard to socioeconomic status approximately 20% of the patients were in each of the 5 income quintiles during the entire study period.
CONCLUSIONS: Our population based study shows an increased rate of females and of patients older than 64 years undergoing definitive treatment for kidney stones with time.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ontario; demography; kidney calculi; lithotripsy; ureteroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25261806     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy and flexible ureteroscopy for the treatment of intermediate proximal ureteral and renal stones in the elderly.

Authors:  Henglong Hu; Yuchao Lu; Deng He; Lei Cui; Jiaqiao Zhang; Zhenyu Zhao; Baolong Qin; Yufeng Wang; Feng Lin; Shaogang Wang
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Baseline chronic kidney disease does not predict long-term renal functional decline after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Kara L Watts; Abhishek Srivastava; Wilson Lin; Daniel Schoenfeld; Matthew Abramowitz; Joshua M Stern
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Single-use versus reusable ureterorenoscopes for retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): systematic comparative analysis of physical and optical properties in three different devices.

Authors:  Susanne Deininger; Luis Haberstock; Stephan Kruck; Eva Neumann; Ines Anselmo da Costa; Tilman Todenhöfer; Jens Bedke; Arnulf Stenzl; Steffen Rausch
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Can Doppler ultrasonography twinkling artifact be used as an alternative imaging modality to non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography in patients with ureteral stones? A prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Volkan Sen; Cetin Imamoglu; Ibrahim Kucukturkmen; Tansu Degirmenci; Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Tarik Yonguc; Ozgu Aydogdu; Bulent Gunlusoy
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  WiScope® single use digital flexible ureteroscope versus reusable flexible ureteroscope for management of renal stones: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Ahmed I Ali; Amr Eldakhakhny; Abdelsalam Abdelfadel; Mahmoud F Rohiem; Mohamed Elbadry; Ali Hassan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 6.  Kidney stones.

Authors:  Saeed R Khan; Margaret S Pearle; William G Robertson; Giovanni Gambaro; Benjamin K Canales; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer; Hans-Göran Tiselius
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 52.329

7.  Comparison of New Single-Use Digital Flexible Ureteroscope Versus Nondisposable Fiber Optic and Digital Ureteroscope in a Cadaveric Model.

Authors:  Silvia Proietti; Laurian Dragos; Wilson Molina; Steeve Doizi; Guido Giusti; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Epidemiology of paediatric renal stone disease: a 22-year single centre experience in the UK.

Authors:  Naomi Issler; Stephanie Dufek; Robert Kleta; Detlef Bockenhauer; Naima Smeulders; William Van't Hoff
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.388

9.  Exploring the Therapeutic Mechanism of Desmodium styracifolium on Oxalate Crystal-Induced Kidney Injuries Using Comprehensive Approaches Based on Proteomics and Network Pharmacology.

Authors:  Jiebin Hou; Wei Chen; Hongtao Lu; Hongxia Zhao; Songyan Gao; Wenrui Liu; Xin Dong; Zhiyong Guo
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  A New Automatically Fixating Stone Basket (2.5 F) Prototype with a Nitinol Spring for Accurate Ureteroscopic Stone Size Measurement.

Authors:  Jens Cordes; Felix Nguyen; Wolfhard Pinkowski; Axel S Merseburger; Tomasz Ozimek
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2018-08-04       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.