Literature DB >> 25261391

Intraocular pressure profiles during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Nafees B Baig1, George P M Cheng1, Jasmine K M Lam1, Vishal Jhanji1, Kelvin K L Chong1, Victor C P Woo1, Clement C Y Tham2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To document the intraocular pressure (IOP) profiles during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.
SETTING: Refractive cataract surgery center.
DESIGN: Prospective case series.
METHODS: Intraocular pressure was measured using a handheld portable applanation tonometer (Tono-Pen Avia) during femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery using the Victus platform.
RESULTS: Forty-one eyes of 35 patients were recruited. The mean age of the patients was 70.5 years ± 8.2 (SD) (range 51 to 85 years). The mean IOP before, during, and after suction was 17.2 ± 3.2 mm Hg (range 10 to 23 mm Hg), 42.1 ± 10.8 mm Hg (range 20 to 55 mm Hg), and 13.8 ± 3.4 mm Hg (range 9 to 25 mm Hg), respectively. The mean difference between IOP before and during suction was 25.0 ± 11.3 mm Hg (range 5 to 43 mm Hg) (P<.01, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The mean difference between IOP during and after suction was -28.7 ± 10.8 mm Hg (range -45 to -10 mm Hg) (P<.01, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The mean suction duration was 216 ± 15 seconds (range 180 to 245 seconds).
CONCLUSIONS: The increase in IOP during the suction phase of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery was statistically significant compared with the baseline IOP. Caution should be taken in patients with ocular conditions that are vulnerable to IOP fluctuation. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2014 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25261391     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2014.04.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  13 in total

1.  Predictors of intraocular pressure reduction after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery: a prospective trial.

Authors:  Eva X Devience; Abdelhalim Awidi; Sachin Kalarn; Stephen DeVience; Brendan Bui; Wuqaas M Munir; Mona A Kaleem; Lily Im; Bennie H Jeng; Yassine Daoud; Osamah J Saeedi
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 2.029

2.  Subfoveal Choroidal Thickness After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery for Age-Related Cataracts.

Authors:  Wan Chen; Hui Chen; Lan Mi; Jing Li; Haotian Lin; Weirong Chen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-07-04

3.  Comparison of intra-ocular pressure changes with liquid or flat applanation interfaces in a femtosecond laser platform.

Authors:  G P Williams; H P Ang; B L George; Y C Liu; G Peh; L Izquierdo; D T Tan; J S Mehta
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  A Comparison of Different Operating Systems for Femtosecond Lasers in Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  B M Wu; G P Williams; A Tan; J S Mehta
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 1.909

5.  Intraocular Pressure Reduction after Femtolaser Assisted Cataract Surgery and Its Association with the Use of Ultrasound.

Authors:  Hana Abouzeid; Walter Ferrini; Murielle Bochud
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Long-term visual field changes after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in glaucoma patients, case series.

Authors:  Daniela Alvarez-Ascencio; Carolina Prado-Larrea; Jesus Jimenez-Roman; Rafael Castañeda-Diez
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep       Date:  2021-07-09

7.  Cataract surgery in the setting of severe pathologic myopia with high axial length: use of pars plana lensectomy and vitrectomy.

Authors:  Daniel Gologorsky; Harry W Flynn
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-27

Review 8.  Femtosecond laser cataract surgery.

Authors:  Zoltan Z Nagy; Colm McAlinden
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2015-06-30

9.  Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in a public teaching hospital setting.

Authors:  Alfonso Vasquez-Perez; Andrew Simpson; Mayank A Nanavaty
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted versus conventional phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Robert Edward Ty Ang; Michelle Marie Salcedo Quinto; Emerson Marquez Cruz; Mark Christian Reyes Rivera; Gladness Henna Austria Martinez
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2018-04-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.