Literature DB >> 25261215

Access to pasture for dairy cows: responses from an online engagement.

C A Schuppli1, M A G von Keyserlingk1, D M Weary2.   

Abstract

An online engagement exercise documented the views of Canadian and U.S. participants affiliated and unaffiliated with the dairy industry on the issue of pasture access for dairy cows. A total of 414 people participated in 10 independent web forums. Providing access to more natural living conditions, including pasture, was viewed as important for the large majority of participants, including those affiliated with the dairy industry. This finding is at odds with current practice on the majority of farms in North America that provide little or no access to pasture. Participant comments showed that the perceived value of pasture access for dairy cattle went beyond the benefits of eating grass; participants cited as benefits exposure to fresh air, ability to move freely, ability to live in social groups, improved health, and healthier milk products. To accommodate the challenges of allowing pasture access on farms, some participants argued in favor of hybrid systems that provide a mixture of indoor confinement housing and grazing. Understanding the beliefs and concerns of participants affiliated and unaffiliated with the dairy industry allows for the identification of contentious topics as well as areas of agreement; this is important in efforts to better harmonize industry practices with societal expectations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal welfare; attitudes; grazing; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25261215     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2014-7725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  17 in total

1.  Online Chats to Assess Stakeholder Perceptions of Meat Chicken Intensification and Welfare.

Authors:  Tiffani J Howell; Vanessa I Rohlf; Grahame J Coleman; Jean-Loup Rault
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Brazilian Citizens: Expectations Regarding Dairy Cattle Welfare and Awareness of Contentious Practices.

Authors:  Clarissa S Cardoso; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Maria José Hötzel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-26       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Public opinion towards castration without anaesthesia and lack of access to pasture in beef cattle production.

Authors:  Dayane Lemos Teixeira; Rafael Larraín; Oscar Melo; María José Hötzel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  American and German attitudes towards cow-calf separation on dairy farms.

Authors:  Gesa Busch; Daniel M Weary; Achim Spiller; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  A Proposal for a UK Ethics Council for Animal Policy: The Case for Putting Ethics Back into Policy Making.

Authors:  Steven P McCulloch; Michael J Reiss
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Factors influencing public support for dairy tie stall housing in the U.S.

Authors:  Jesse A Robbins; Caitlin Roberts; Daniel M Weary; Becca Franks; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  The Influence of Different Types of Outdoor Access on Dairy Cattle Behavior.

Authors:  Anne-Marieke C Smid; Daniel M Weary; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-05-13

8.  Social Licking in Pregnant Dairy Heifers.

Authors:  Grazyne Tresoldi; Daniel M Weary; Luiz Carlos Pinheiro Machado Filho; Marina A G von Keyserlingk
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Public Attitudes to Housing Systems for Pregnant Pigs.

Authors:  E B Ryan; D Fraser; D M Weary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Hot and bothered: Public attitudes towards heat stress and outdoor access for dairy cows.

Authors:  Clarissa S Cardoso; Marina A G von Keyserlingk; Maria José Hötzel; Jesse Robbins; Daniel M Weary
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.