Literature DB >> 2526109

Teicoplanin in the treatment of infections by staphylococci, Clostridium difficile and other gram-positive bacteria.

F de Lalla1, D Santoro, E Rinaldi, F Suter, M Cruciani, M H Guaglianone, G Rizzardini, G Pellegata.   

Abstract

Eighty-three episodes of Gram-positive infection in 82 patients were treated with teicoplanin in an open study. Infectious episodes included endocarditis (6 cases), bacteraemia (7), osteomyelitis (8), pseudomembranous colitis (13), cellulitis (11), urinary tract infection (5), pneumonia (1), wound and post-surgical infections (9) and erysipelas (23). Four patients affected by an overwhelming Gram-positive infection as well as eight cases of Gram-positive-Gram-negative mixed infections received teicoplanin in combination with other antibiotics. The average duration of treatment was 16 days (range 5-70). In pseudomembranous colitis teicoplanin was given by mouth for ten days. Staphylococcus aureus (11 methicillin-sensitive and 13 methicillin-resistant strains) and Clostridium difficile (13 isolates) were the most frequent pathogens. Overall 89% (74/83) of the infections were cured, 3.6% (3/83) improved and 3.6% (3/83) failed. Relapse and superinfection were observed in 2.4% (2/83) and 1.2% (1/83) episodes respectively. All pseudomembranous colitis cases were clinically cured and C. difficile was eradicated in all but one patient. The MIC range, MIC50 and MIC90 (mg/l) of teicoplanin for C. difficile were less than 0.125-0.250, less than 0.125 and 0.250 respectively. Pharmacokinetic studies in patients given a single iv daily maintenance dose of 400 mg showed that the steady-state trough teicoplanin concentrations in serum were reached on day 8. Assays of skin-subcutaneous tissue biopsies showed that teicoplanin penetrated well into these structures. Side effects were observed in six of the 82 treated patients (7.3%) and teicoplanin had to be discontinued in four cases. The results of the study show that teicoplanin is a safe and useful new agent for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistant staphylococci and C. difficile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2526109     DOI: 10.1093/jac/23.1.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  8 in total

Review 1.  Teicoplanin. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  D M Campoli-Richards; R N Brogden; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Failure of treatment with teicoplanin at 6 milligrams/kilogram/day in patients with Staphylococcus aureus intravascular infection. The Infectious Diseases Consortium of Oregon.

Authors:  D N Gilbert; C A Wood; R C Kimbrough
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Prospective study of oral teicoplanin versus oral vancomycin for therapy of pseudomembranous colitis and Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  F de Lalla; R Nicolin; E Rinaldi; P Scarpellini; R Rigoli; V Manfrin; A Tramarin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated disease with teicoplanin.

Authors:  F de Lalla; G Privitera; E Rinaldi; G Ortisi; D Santoro; G Rizzardini
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Treatment of cerebrospinal fluid shunt infections with teicoplanin.

Authors:  M L Fernández Guerrero; M de Górgolas; R Fernández Roblas; J M Campos
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Italian guidelines for the diagnosis and infectious disease management of osteomyelitis and prosthetic joint infections in adults.

Authors:  S Esposito; S Leone; M Bassetti; S Borrè; F Leoncini; E Meani; M Venditti; F Mazzotta
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 7.455

7.  Systemic and local antibiotic prophylaxis in the prevention of Staphylococcus epidermidis graft infection.

Authors:  Huseyin Turgut; Suzan Sacar; Ilknur Kaleli; Mustafa Sacar; Ibrahim Goksin; Semra Toprak; Ali Asan; Nural Cevahir; Koray Tekin; Ahmet Baltalarli
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  The efficacy of thuricin CD, tigecycline, vancomycin, teicoplanin, rifampicin and nitazoxanide, independently and in paired combinations against Clostridium difficile biofilms and planktonic cells.

Authors:  Harsh Mathur; Mary C Rea; Paul D Cotter; Colin Hill; R Paul Ross
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.181

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.