Hideki Higashi1, Jan J Barendregt2, Nicholas J Kassebaum3, Thomas G Weiser4, Stephen W Bickler5, Theo Vos1. 1. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 2. School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. 3. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA Division of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. 5. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the burden of selected congenital anomalies in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) that could be reduced should surgical programmes cover the entire population with access to quality care. DESIGN: Burden of disease and epidemiological modelling. SETTING: LMICs from all global regions. POPULATION: All prevalent cases of selected congenital anomalies at birth in 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). INTERVENTIONS AND METHODS: Surgical programmes for three congenital conditions were analysed: clefts (lip and palate); congenital heart anomalies; and neural tube defects. Data from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study were used to estimate the combination of fatal burden that could be addressed by surgical care and the additional long-term non-fatal burden associated with increased survival. RESULTS: Of the estimated 21.6 million DALYs caused by these three conditions in LMICs, 12.4 million DALYs (57%) are potentially addressable by surgical care among the population born with such conditions. Neural tube defects have the largest potential with 76% of burden amenable by surgery, followed by clefts (59%) and congenital heart anomalies (49%). Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia have the greatest proportion of surgically addressable burden for clefts (68%), North Africa and Middle East for congenital heart anomalies (73%), and South Asia for neural tube defects (81%). CONCLUSIONS: There is an important and neglected role surgical programmes can play in reducing the burden of congenital anomalies in LMICs. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the burden of selected congenital anomalies in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) that could be reduced should surgical programmes cover the entire population with access to quality care. DESIGN: Burden of disease and epidemiological modelling. SETTING: LMICs from all global regions. POPULATION: All prevalent cases of selected congenital anomalies at birth in 2010. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). INTERVENTIONS AND METHODS: Surgical programmes for three congenital conditions were analysed: clefts (lip and palate); congenital heart anomalies; and neural tube defects. Data from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study were used to estimate the combination of fatal burden that could be addressed by surgical care and the additional long-term non-fatal burden associated with increased survival. RESULTS: Of the estimated 21.6 million DALYs caused by these three conditions in LMICs, 12.4 million DALYs (57%) are potentially addressable by surgical care among the population born with such conditions. Neural tube defects have the largest potential with 76% of burden amenable by surgery, followed by clefts (59%) and congenital heart anomalies (49%). Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia have the greatest proportion of surgically addressable burden for clefts (68%), North Africa and Middle East for congenital heart anomalies (73%), and South Asia for neural tube defects (81%). CONCLUSIONS: There is an important and neglected role surgical programmes can play in reducing the burden of congenital anomalies in LMICs. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Congenital Abnorm; Epidemiology; Paediatric Surgery
Authors: Lucas C Carlson; Barclay T Stewart; Kristin W Hatcher; Charles Kabetu; Richard VanderBurg; William P Magee Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-12 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Emily R Smith; Tessa Concepcion; Stephanie Lim; Sam Sadler; Dan Poenaru; Anthony T Saxton; Mark Shrime; Emmanuel Ameh; Henry E Rice Journal: World J Surg Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Katherine T Flynn-O'Brien; Miguel Trelles; Lynette Dominguez; Ghulam Hiadar Hassani; Clemence Akemani; Aamer Naseer; Innocent Bagura Ntawukiruwabo; Adam L Kushner; David H Rothstein; Barclay T Stewart Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2015-09-15 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Dagoberto Estevez-Ordonez; Michael C Dewan; Michael J Feldman; Eleazar E Montalvan-Sanchez; Daniela M Montalvan-Sanchez; Aida A Rodriguez-Murillo; Samuel A Urrutia-Argueta; Charlotte B Cherry; Douglas R Morgan; Roberto Alvarez-Rodriguez; Christopher M Bonfield Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2017-07-29 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Anthony T Saxton; Dan Poenaru; Doruk Ozgediz; Emmanuel A Ameh; Diana Farmer; Emily R Smith; Henry E Rice Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 3.240