Camille Malatt1, Mazen Zawaideh1, Cherng Chao2, John R Hesselink2, Roland R Lee3, James Y Chen3. 1. University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California. 2. Department of Radiology, UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, California. 3. Department of Radiology, UC San Diego Health System, San Diego, California; Department of Radiology, San Diego VA Medical Center, San Diego, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of noncontrast head computed tomography (CT) has become commonplace in the emergency department (ED) as a means of screening for a wide variety of pathologies. Approximately 1 in 14 ED patients receives a head CT scan, and analyzing and interpreting this high volume of images in a timely manner is a daily challenge. OBJECTIVES: Minimizing interpretation error is of paramount importance in the context of life-threatening and time-sensitive diagnoses. Therefore, it is prudent for the physician to recognize particular pitfalls in head CT interpretation and establish search patterns and practices that minimize such errors. In this article, we discuss a collection of common ED cases with easily missed findings, and identify time-effective practices and patterns to minimize interpretation error. DISCUSSION: There are numerous reasons for false-negative interpretations, including, but not limited to, incomplete or misleading clinical history, failure to review prior studies, suboptimal windowing and leveling, and failure to utilize multiple anatomic views via multi-planar reconstructions and scout views. We illustrate this in four specific clinical scenarios: stroke, trauma, headache, and altered mental status. CONCLUSION: Accurate and timely interpretation in the emergent setting is a daily challenge for emergency physicians. Knowledge of easily overlooked yet critical findings is a first step in minimizing interpretation error.
BACKGROUND: The use of noncontrast head computed tomography (CT) has become commonplace in the emergency department (ED) as a means of screening for a wide variety of pathologies. Approximately 1 in 14 ED patients receives a head CT scan, and analyzing and interpreting this high volume of images in a timely manner is a daily challenge. OBJECTIVES: Minimizing interpretation error is of paramount importance in the context of life-threatening and time-sensitive diagnoses. Therefore, it is prudent for the physician to recognize particular pitfalls in head CT interpretation and establish search patterns and practices that minimize such errors. In this article, we discuss a collection of common ED cases with easily missed findings, and identify time-effective practices and patterns to minimize interpretation error. DISCUSSION: There are numerous reasons for false-negative interpretations, including, but not limited to, incomplete or misleading clinical history, failure to review prior studies, suboptimal windowing and leveling, and failure to utilize multiple anatomic views via multi-planar reconstructions and scout views. We illustrate this in four specific clinical scenarios: stroke, trauma, headache, and altered mental status. CONCLUSION: Accurate and timely interpretation in the emergent setting is a daily challenge for emergency physicians. Knowledge of easily overlooked yet critical findings is a first step in minimizing interpretation error.
Authors: Philips G Michael; Rakesh M Jamkhandikar; Imran K Memon; Tahra Al-Saadi; Said Al-Aghbari; Majed Al-Muqaimi; Misbahuddin Ansari; Ahmed Al-Shamakhi; Asifa Ahmad Journal: Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J Date: 2017-10-10