Literature DB >> 2525868

Left main coronary angioplasty: early and late results of 127 acute and elective procedures.

J H O'Keefe1, G O Hartzler, B D Rutherford, D R McConahay, W L Johnson, L V Giorgi, R W Ligon.   

Abstract

The results of 127 left main (LM) coronary angioplasties were reviewed to assess short- and long-term effectiveness. Three major subgroups were considered: (1) elective "protected" (defined as the presence of a patent bypass graft to the left coronary circulation) patients (n = 84); (2) elective "unprotected" patients (n = 33); and (3) acute patients, in whom LM coronary angioplasty was performed in the setting of an acute myocardial infarction (n = 10). Successful LM dilation was achieved in 94% of elective patients and 90% of acute patients. Procedural mortality was 4.3% in elective patients (2.4 and 9.1% in protected and unprotected patients, respectively, p = 0.14) and 50% in the acute subgroup. Long-term follow-up data, available for 98% of patients, revealed actuarial 3-year survival rates of 90 and 36% in elective protected and unprotected subgroups, respectively (p less than 0.0005). In the acute subgroup, 3 patients (30%) were alive at the time of follow-up; all had undergone coronary artery bypass surgery. Thus, although elective angioplasty of an unprotected LM coronary artery is technically feasible, the long-term prognosis of such patients is very poor. LM angioplasty in this subgroup should be reserved for patients in whom surgical revascularization is not an option. In contrast, elective angioplasty of a protected LM coronary artery can be accomplished safely with good long-term results. LM coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction can be effective as a salvage procedure; however, adjunctive coronary bypass surgery is important for long-term survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2525868     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90447-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  23 in total

1.  Plastic surgical reconstruction of left main coronary artery.

Authors:  Y Soga; H Okabayashi; I Shimada; S Enomoto; K Matsubayashi; Y Kamikawa; Y Saitoh; A Nagasawa; T Morimoto
Journal:  Jpn J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1999-03

2.  Left main stem coronary disease: the case for percutaneous coronary intervention in a high risk patient with complex disease.

Authors:  K Kosuga; H Tamai
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Emergency stenting of unprotected left main coronary artery after acute catheter-induced occlusive dissection.

Authors:  Ferit Akgul; Talantbek Batyraliev; Fikret Besnili; Zarema Karben
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

4.  [Direct dilatation and emergency bypass operation of main branch occlusion in acute anterior wall infarct and cardiogenic shock].

Authors:  R Zahn; M Schneider; S Schuster; K Seidl; F Isgro; C Werling; J Senges
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  STENTING STRATEGY AND FOLLOW-UP RESULTS OF MULTI-CENTER REGISTRY IN FUKUSHIMA CITY FOR LEFT MAIN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE: BARE METAL STENT VERSUS DRUG-ELUTING STENT.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Nakazato; Hiroyuki Mizukami; Hideki Ohtake; Nobuo Sakamoto; Takayoshi Yamaki; Osamu Yamaguchi; Hiroyuki Kunii; Takayuki Ohwada; Yasuchika Takeishi
Journal:  Fukushima J Med Sci       Date:  2015-07-02

Review 6.  Stenting versus surgery for significant left main disease.

Authors:  Ralf E Harskamp; Duk-Woo Park
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  [Care of patients after coronary stent implantation: what is important in practice?].

Authors:  V Schächinger
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 0.743

8.  Is percutaneous coronary intervention as effective as bypass surgery in left main stem coronary artery stenosis?

Authors:  T Stiermaier; G Schuler; E Boudriot; S Desch; H Thiele
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.443

9.  Long term follow up after elective percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected non-bifurcational left main stenosis: is it time to change the guidelines?

Authors:  B R G Brueren; J M P G Ernst; M J Suttorp; J M ten Berg; B J W M Rensing; E G Mast; E T Bal; A J Six; H W M Plokker
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Intravascular ultrasound to guide percutaneous coronary interventions: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2006-04-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.