Literature DB >> 25258651

Circulating microRNAs in Pancreatic Juice as Candidate Biomarkers of Pancreatic Cancer.

Jin Wang1, Massimo Raimondo2, Sushovan Guha3, Jinyun Chen4, Lixia Diao5, Xiaoqun Dong6, Michael B Wallace2, Ann M Killary7, Marsha L Frazier8, Timothy A Woodward2, Jing Wang5, Subrata Sen7.   

Abstract

Development of sensitive and specific biomarkers, preferably those circulating in body fluids is critical for early diagnosis of cancer. This study performed profiling of microRNAs (miRNAs) in exocrine pancreatic secretions (pancreatic juice) by microarray analysis utilizing pancreatic juice from 6 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients and two pooled samples from 6 non-pancreatic, non-healthy (NPNH) as controls. Differentially circulating miRNAs were subsequently validated in 88 pancreatic juice samples from 50 PDAC, 19 chronic pancreatitis (CP) patients and 19 NPNH controls. A marked difference in the profiles of four circulating miRNAs (miR-205, miR-210, miR-492, and miR-1427) was observed in pancreatic juice collected from patients with PDAC and those without pancreatic disease. Elevated levels of the four miRNAs together predicted PDAC with a specificity of 88% and sensitivity of 87%. Inclusion of serum CA19-9 level increased the sensitivity to 91% and the specificity to 100%. Enrichment of the four miRNAs in pancreatic juice was associated with decreased OS, as was the combination of miR-205 and miR-210. Higher contents of miR-205 and miR-210 were also associated with lymph node metastasis. Elevated levels of circulating miR-205, miR-210, miR-492, and miR-1247 in pancreatic juice are, therefore, promising candidate biomarkers of disease and poor prognosis in patients with PDAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarker; circulating; miRNA; pancreatic cancer.; pancreatic juice

Year:  2014        PMID: 25258651      PMCID: PMC4174514          DOI: 10.7150/jca.10094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer        ISSN: 1837-9664            Impact factor:   4.207


Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States, with a 5‑year survival rate of about 6% 1. When the tumor is detected at an early stage, surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy can increase the 5-year survival rate to 15-40% 2. Thus, screening strategies for detection of early stage cancer or precursor lesions in individuals at highest risk, as well as pancreatic cancer biomarker assays for biological fluids, are urgently needed to reduce the high morbidity and mortality associated with this malignancy. Exocrine pancreatic secretions, or pancreatic juice, collected from the second part of the duodenum after stimulation with intravenous synthetic human secretin using an upper endoscope 3-5 have been analyzed for molecular markers associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) 6, 7. Protein and gene expression profiles in the pancreatic juice of patients with PDAC have revealed novel protein markers and indicator genes that might be useful for PDAC diagnosis 8, 9. More recently, NGAL and MIC-1 in pancreatic juice were reported to be useful markers for diagnosing benign and malignant disease of the pancreas 10. However, since tumor-associated proteins may constitute only a minor fraction of the vast and dynamic range of proteins in blood plasma and other body fluids, proteomic-based strategies for identification of circulating cancer biomarkers have had limited success so far 11. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of conserved small non-coding RNAs, which regulate gene expression via complementarity with the 3'-untranslated region of their target mRNAs, repressing translation and causing degradation of multiple target mRNAs 12. MicroRNAs have critical regulatory functions in cell development, proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and stress response. A number of studies in the past few years have established the regulatory roles of miRNAs in complex genetic networks underlying various cellular pathways 13. Aberrant expression of several miRNAs has been detected in PDAC and its precursor, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasm 14. Varying levels of circulating miRNAs in body fluids have been associated with corresponding tumor-specific aberrant expression and proposed to represent novel biomarkers for detection and diagnosis of various cancers 15, 16. We have earlier demonstrated that miRNAs in the plasma of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) may serve as novel blood-based biomarkers of disease 17. Serum and pancreatic cyst fluid levels of miR‑21, miR‑210 and miR-155 have been found elevated in patients with PDAC 18-21. Elevated serum level of miR-1290 has recently been reported to accurately distinguish patients with low stage pancreatic cancer from healthy and disease controls 22. Altered levels of miRNAs in blood and body fluids can distinguish patients with cancer from healthy individuals 16, 17, 23. In view of a published report that relative expression levels of miR-21 and miR-155 in tissue and pancreatic juice from PDAC patients were significantly higher than those with chronic pancreatitis 24, it appears that unbiased profiling of circulating miRNAs in pancreatic juice may offer a viable approach for developing reliable biomarker assays for detecting PDAC. In this study, we performed microarray profiling of miRNAs in the pancreatic juice of patients with PDAC compared with those from individuals with chronic pancreatitis and non-pancreatic disease controls to investigate the utility of differentially circulating miRNAs as biomarkers for pancreatic cancer.

Materials and Methods

Patients

This prospective study was approved by the Mayo Clinic and M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Institutional Review Boards. Patients presenting at the Mayo Clinic with epigastric pain or discomfort warranting evaluation by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and later diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis (CP), pancreatic cancer or no pancreatic disease (non-pancreatic, non-healthy [NPNH] controls) were enrolled. Pancreatic juice and serum samples were collected. Sera were assayed for CA19-9 and the definitive final diagnosis was made. A multiphase, case-control study was designed to identify pancreatic juice miRNAs as potential markers for PDAC. In the initial biomarker identification stage, miRNA microarray profiling was performed on six pancreatic juice samples of PDAC patients and two pooled pancreatic juice samples from 6 NPNH controls to assay the circulating miRNA profiles. Validation of four differentially enriched miRNAs was then performed using qRT-PCR assay. All the pancreatic juice samples were separated randomly into training set (6 PDAC and 6 NPNH controls) and validation set (44 PDAC, 19 CP and13 NPNH controls) prior to analysis from a total of 88 patients enrolled in the study as described previously 10.

Collection of Secretin-Stimulated Exocrine Pancreatic Secretions (Pancreatic Juice)

All patients underwent upper endoscopic intubation after an overnight fast. Patients were moderately sedated with midazolam and meperidine before the procedure. Synthetic human secretin (ChiRhoStim; ChiRhoClin Inc, Burtonsville, MD) at a dose of 0.2 μg/kg (or a total dose of 16 μg) was administered intravenously for 1 minute immediately before endoscopic intubation. Gastric fluid was aspirated before intubation of the pylorus to minimize contamination. With the endoscope positioned in the second portion of the duodenum, opposite the papilla of Vater (without cannulation), a 2.3-mm plastic aspiration catheter (Hobbs Medical, Stafford Springs, CT) was passed through the biopsy channel of the endoscope until it was visible on the endoscopic monitor screen. Pancreatic juice exiting the papilla was then suctioned through the catheter for 10 minutes into a dry 20-mL tube attached to the proximal end of the catheter. On average, 5-8 mL of fluid was collected from each patient. The collected fluid was immediately aliquoted into 2-mL vials, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C until assays for miRNA microarrays and real-time polymerase chain reaction were performed. A pan-protease inhibitor cocktail pill (Roche Diagnostic Corporation, Indianapolis, IN) was added to the collected pancreatic juice to inhibit proteolytic degradation.

Determination of Final Diagnosis

Three gastroenterologists (Massimo Raimondo, Michael B. Wallace, and Timothy A. Woodward), who were blinded to the results of the miRNA assays, determined the final diagnosis of the patients on the basis of clinical history and laboratory, radiologic (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging), or endoscopic (endoscopic ultrasound or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic) findings (chronic pancreatitis) and cytologic or histologic findings (for those with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma). Patients with no prior history of pancreatic disease and who had normal pancreatic test results (ultrasound, cholangiopancreatography, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging) were deemed to have normal pancreata and thus considered to be non-pancreatic, non-healthy (NPNH) controls.

CA19-9 Measurement

Concentrations of CA19-9 in the pancreatic juice and serum of patients were measured, as described previously 10. Briefly, CA19-9 antigen concentration was determined using a solid-phase radioimmunoassay (Centocor, Malvern, PA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Quantities of CA19-9 were expressed in arbitrary units (U/mL) with 1 unit of activity corresponding to approximately 0.8 ng of purified antigenic protein for CA19-9.

miRNA Extraction and Purification

Pancreatic juice was cleared through centrifugation at 1,300 × g at 4°C for 10 minutes and stored at -80°C. Total RNA was extracted and purified from all pancreatic juice samples. For the purpose, cleared pancreatic juice was mixed with Trizol LS (1:3 ratio; Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY), and after phase separation by centrifugation, the aqueous phase was extracted once with phenol/chloroform and added to ethanol before being applied directly to a mirVana miRNA column (Ambion, Austin, TX) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The concentration of RNA samples was quantified using NanoDrop 2000 (NanoDrop, Wilmington, DE). The total amount of RNA extracted from 500 µL of pancreatic juice ranged from 0.21 to 18.90 µg (mean, 1.34 µg).

miRNA Microarray Labeling, Hybridization, and Data Analysis

The G4470A Agilent human miRNA microarray (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) was used to profile miRNA. RNA labeling and hybridization were performed using the Agilent miRNA labeling reagent and hybridization kit according to the manufacturer's protocol. Samples containing 100 ng of RNA were labeled with pCp-Cy3 using T4 RNA ligase (Ambion) and hybridized to microarrays. Microarrays were scanned using an Agilent microarray scanner, data were extracted, and array quality control was performed using Agilent Feature Extraction software. The AgiMicroRna package was used to process Agilent miRNA array data. In addition, hierarchical clustering was performed using Pearson correlation metrics with Ward's linkage.

Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) Analysis

Taqman miRNA assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) were used to perform expression profiling of the miRNAs of interest. RNA was pretreated with DNase (Invitrogen). Ten ng of DNAse-treated RNA from each sample of pancreatic juice was used for each assay. Assays were performed in 15-μL reactions containing the reverse transcription mixture and Taqman primer mix. miRNA expression levels were quantified using the ViiA™ 7 Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies). Relative expression of the mature miRNAs in terms of fold change in the test samples (PDAC or CP) compared with the non-pancreatic, non-healthy (NPNH) controls was calculated using the comparative CT (2-ΔΔCT) method, using RNU6B as the endogenous control to normalize the data, where CT (cycle threshold) is defined as the number of cycles required for the FAM signal to cross the threshold in real-time PCR. ΔCT was calculated by subtracting the CT values of RNU6B from the CT values of the miRNA of interest. ΔΔCT was then calculated by subtracting the mean ΔCT of NPNH controls from the ΔCT of test samples (PDAC or CP).

Locked Nucleic Acid In Situ Hybridization (LNA-ISH)

For analyzing miRNA expression formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor tissue slides were toasted, de-waxed in xylenes, and rehydrated through an ethanol dilution series. Tissue sections were digested with 15 μg/mL proteinase K and then treated with 3% hydrogen peroxide. Tissue sections were then subjected to prehybridization solution at 50°C for 30 minutes. The prehybridization solution was replaced with 50 μL of hybridization solution containing 10 pmol of the fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled LNA probes for the miRNAs. Slides were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin, incubated with anti-Fluorescein-HRP conjugated antibodies, and subjected to the CSA II Biotin-free Tyramide Signal Amplification System Kit (DAKO, Carpenteria, CA) as described previously 25.

Statistical Analysis

All clinicopathologic variables and miRNA expression levels in pancreatic juice were analyzed using SPSS v19 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Unpaired t tests were used to compare pancreatic juice miRNA expression between groups and p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. The relationship between miRNA expression and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, with adjustments made for sex, ethnicity, and other clinical factors that were significant predictors of OS in multivariate Cox regression models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to evaluate the ability of each individual miRNA and CA19-9 either individually or in combination to detect pancreatic cancer. OS curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The median expression level of each miRNA was used as the cutoff point in Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Results

Patient Characteristics

Among the 88 patients enrolled in the study (training and validation sets), 19 were NPNH controls, 19 were diagnosed with CP, and 50 were diagnosed with PDAC. Patient demographic and clinicopathologic information is presented in Table 1. Among the 50 patients with PDAC, univariate analysis by SPSS showed that OS did not differ by age, sex, smoking and alcohol history, diabetes mellitus, CA19-9 findings, or lymph node involvement. The median OS duration of the 50 patients with PDAC was 7.90 months (95% CI, 0.417-41.09 months). However, the median follow-up time was 12.43 months for the patients who were still alive at the time of analysis. Well to moderate tumor differentiation was associated with increased OS duration (P=0.005).
Table 1

Characteristics of the Study Population.

CharacteristicNPNH (n = 19)CP (n = 19)PDAC (n = 50)
No. of patientsNo. of deathMST (months)P value
Age, years0.188
<609812710.73
61-706518158.70
>704620134.37
Sex 0.109
Male51130225.70
Female148201310.73
Ethnicity 0.047
White161748348.00
Black21212.07
Hispanic1000
Asian0100
Smoking historya0.347
Current27965.63
Former661588.70
Never11625215.20
History of alcohol usea0.696
Current9924146.77
Former55878.70
Never55171410.27
Diabetes mellitusa0.451
Yes351073.93
No161439288.70
CA19-9, U/mL0.404
<5096639.77
51-50011422.07
501-150034542.33
>15006835267.90
Lymph node b0.290
0191935268.00
1001396.77
Tumor differentiationa0.005
Well to moderate--9518.33
Poor or not available--40305.63

aSmoking history, history of alcohol use, diabetes status and tumor differentiation were not available for 1 patient with PDAC. b lymph node was not available for 2 patient with PDAC.

Pancreatic Juice miRNA Profiles of Patients with PDAC

The pancreatic juice miRNA microarray profiles of 6 patients with PDAC were compared with those of pooled samples from 6 NPNH controls. Hierarchical clustering of miRNA expression using the Pearson correlation distance metric and Ward's linkage revealed clusters of patients with PDAC and NPNH controls after Robust Multi-Array Average (RMA) normalization (Fig. 1A). Levels of 49 miRNAs differed by at least 1.5-fold in the pancreatic juice of patients with PDAC compared with that of NPNH controls (P < 0.05; Additional File 1: Supplementary Table S1). To statistically analyze the similarity of pancreatic juice miRNA profiles among patients with PDAC, we generated a dendrogram of cancer-dependent miRNAs, in which PDAC pancreatic juice samples with similar miRNA profiles were grouped together (Fig. 1B). Multiple miRNAs with elevated profiles in the pancreatic juice, including miR-205 and miR-210, which are known to be overexpressed in PDAC tissue 26, 27, were found to segregate into distinct clusters in the dendrogram generated. We selected miR-492 and miR-1247, the top two miRNAs in the same cluster as miR-205 and miR-210, which have not been previously reported in PDAC, for validation as novel candidate biomarkers circulating at elevated levels in the pancreatic juice of patients with PDAC.
Figure 1

Hierarchical clustering analysis of microRNA microarray expression profile. (A) Clusters of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and non-pancreatic, non-healthy controls (NPNH). (B) Hierarchical clustering of microRNA expression in PDAC pancreatic juice samples with similar miRNA profiles were grouped together, which showed that miR-492, miR-1247, miR-205 and miR-210 were in the same cluster.

Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR) Analysis of Candidate miRNAs

To validate the differential enrichment of four candidate miRNA biomarkers in pancreatic juice, identified on expression microarrays, we used qRT-PCR assay for 4 miRNAs (miR-205, miR-210, miR-492, and miR-1247) in individual pancreatic juice samples (training set). The relative abundance of four miRNAs, normalized to the level of RNU6B, significantly varied in pancreatic juice samples from patients with PDAC and NPNH. The levels of four miRNAs were further assayed in a larger cohort consisting of an independent set of pancreatic juice samples (validation set). The p values revealed that the levels of these miRNAs showed statistically significant differences among patients in these three groups (PDAC, CP and NPNH; miR-205, P = 0.04; miR-210, P = 1.90E-05; miR-492, P = 0.005; miR-1247, P = 0.04; Fig. 2A and Table 2). The mean fold changes of miRNAs and the p values reflected segregation of PDAC, CP, and NPNH samples in terms of varying miRNA levels, with the levels relatively high in PDAC, low in controls and intermediate in CP although the difference between PDAC and CP were not significant.
Figure 2

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and Locked nucleic acid (A) qRT-PCR analysis of relative expression levels of 4 microRNAs (miR-205, miR-210, miR-492, and miR-1247) in pancreatic juice samples from patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP), and non-pancreatic, non-healthy (NPNH) controls. The relative abundance of four miRNAs, normalized to the level of RNU6B, significantly varied in pancreatic juice samples from patients with PDAC, CP and NPNH. (B) LNA-ISH-IHC images showing miR-492 expression in 3 (J101, J16, J39) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma tissue samples (magnification ×100). (C) The graph shows qRT-PCR results for miR-492 in pancreatic juice samples from the same patients.

Table 2

MicroRNA (miRNA) expression in samples of pancreatic juice from patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); Chronic pancreatitis (CP); Non-pancreatic, non-healthy controls (NPNH).

miRNA expressionNPNH samples (n = 19), no. (%)CP samples (n = 19), no. (%)PDAC samples (n = 50), no. (%)P value
miR-2050.04
Low14 (74)10 (53)20 (40)
High5 (26)9 (47)30 (60)
miR-2101.90E-05
Low18 (95)10 (53)16 (32)
High1 (5)9 (47)34 (68)
miR-4920.005
Low16 (84)10 (53)20 (40)
High3 (16)9 (47)30 (60)
miR-1247 0.04
Low13 (76)9 (47)20 (41)
High4 (24)10 (53)29 (59)
miR-205/ miR-2108.31E-04
0-119 (100)13 (68)26 (52)
206 (32)24 (48)
The relative increase in the levels of the candidate miRNAs in pancreatic juice samples from patients with PDAC was significantly higher than in samples from NPNH controls (miR-205, P = 0.009; miR-210, P = 0.010; miR-492, P= 0.003; miR-1247, P= 0.041; Additional File 1: Supplementary Table S2). These results were in good agreement with microarray and training set results. Levels of the candidate miRNAs were higher in the CP samples than in the NPNH samples, although the difference was statistically significant for only miR-492. Levels of miR-205, miR-210, and miR-1247 did not differ between the CP samples and the NPNH samples. These miRNAs were significantly elevated in PDAC samples compared with NPNH samples but not compared with the CP samples.

Expression of miRNAs in PDAC Tumor Samples

To investigate whether varying levels of miRNAs detected in the pancreatic juice of patients with PDAC reflected differential expression of the miRNAs in pancreatic tumor tissues, we performed LNA-ISH with the miRNA probes on a limited set of 12 available tumor tissue samples. miRNAs detected by LNA-ISH in the tumor tissues (Fig. 2B) were consistent with those detected in the corresponding pancreatic juice samples (Fig. 2C). To estimate miRNA-492 and miRNA-1247 differential expression in PDAC, qRT-PCR analysis of miRNA expression was also undertaken in 34 paired samples of PDAC tissue and adjacent normal tissue. Twenty PDAC tumor samples (59%) showed increased expression of miR-492, and only 13 samples (38%) showed increased expression of miR-1247 (data not shown).

Pancreatic Juice miRNA Profiles as Biomarkers of PDAC

The ability of the 4 miRNAs to differentiate PDAC pancreatic juice samples from NPNH pancreatic juice samples was assessed using ROC curves, which indicated that the 4 miRNAs are candidate biomarker of PDAC (miR-205 AUC = 0.68; miR-210 AUC = 0.84; miR-492 AUC = 0.80; miR-1247 AUC = 0.63). For all 4 miRNAs combined, the AUC was 0.92, documenting that the altered levels of the 4 miRNAs in pancreatic juice can differentiate patients with PDAC from NPNH controls. When serum expression of CA19-9 was considered along with the 4 miRNAs, the AUC was 0.99, which was significantly improved compared with both CA19-9 alone (AUC = 0.89) and the combination of the 4 miRNAs without CA19-9 (Fig. 3A and Additional File 1: Supplementary Table S3).
Figure 3

Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and Kaplan-Meier plots showing association of pancreatic juice miRNA profiles in PDAC patients and their clinical outcome. (A) Receiver operating characteristic curves showing expression levels of individual microRNAs (miR-205, miR-210, miR-492, and miR-1247), CA19-9, and a combination. (B) Kaplan-Meier overall survival curves for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with high levels of both miR-205 and miR-210 at or above the median (shown in green); either miR-205 or miR-210, or neither upregulated in pancreatic juice samples (shown in blue). The curves were compared using univariate (log-rank) analysis.

ROC curves helped determine the sensitivities and specificities of the miRNAs at various cutoff values (Supplementary Table S3). Using the optimal cutoff points, sensitivity and specificity were 64% and 74%, respectively, for miR-205; 76% and 95% for miR-210; 73% and 82% for miR-492; and 53% and 88% for miR-1247. The sensitivity and specificity for the 4 miRNAs combined were 87% and 88%, respectively. Finally, the combination of the 4 miRNAs plus CA19-9 had a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 100%, which was significantly improved than CA 19-9 alone (77% sensitivity, 93% specificity).

Pancreatic Juice miRNAs as Biomarkers for PDAC Prognosis, Tumor Differentiation, and Lymph Node Metastasis

We performed Kaplan-Meier analyses to assess the relationship between pancreatic juice miRNA levels and clinical outcome, using the median expression level as a cutoff (at or above the median = high expression; below the median = low expression), in 36 PDAC patients for whom all the clinical data were available. Multivariate Cox regression models for individual miRNAs and combinations of miRNAs are shown in Table 3. Patients with low levels of miR-205 or miR-210 (individually) had longer OS durations than patients with high levels of these miRNAs, but the difference was not statistically significant (miR-205 log-rank P = 0.166; miR-210 log-rank P = 0.211). However, we found that elevated levels of all 4 miRNAs was associated with shorter OS (log-rank P = 0.050), as was high expression of both miR-205 and miR-210 together (log-rank P = 0.029). Patients with low levels of both miR-205 and miR-210 tended to have longer OS durations than did patients with high levels of both miR-205 and miR-210 (Fig. 3B).
Table 3

Median overall survival time (MST) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with high and low levels of circulating miRNAs in pancreatic juice.

miRNA expressionNo. of patientsNo. of deathsMST, monthsLog-rank P valueHR (95% CI)aP value
miR-205
Low b151312.400.1661.46(0.66-3.12)0.347
High c21205.63
miR-210
Low11911.330.2111.78(0.66-4.80)0.254
High25246.77
miR-492
Low17157.900.6780.82(0.36-1.83)0.620
High19188.70
niR-1247
Low14146.770.5861.47(0.67-3.23)0.334
High21187.90
miR-205/miR-210/ miR-492/miR-1247
0-3d32298.70
4e443.770.0502.87 (0.93-8.87)0.067
miR-205/miR-210
0-1f181511.33
2g18183.930.0292.14 (1.06-4.29)0.030

aHazard ratios (HR) derived from multivariate Cox regression models adjusted for sex, ethnicity, CA19-9 levels, and stage; bLow < the median expression level; cHigh ≥ the median expression level; d0-3: Patients with ≤ three miRNAs (miR-205, miR-210, miR-492 and miR-1247) upregulated in pancreatic juice; e4: Patients with four miRNAs upregulated in pancreatic juice; f0-1: Patients with either miR-205 or miR-210 upregulated in pancreatic juice; g2: Both miR-205 and miR-210 upregulated in pancreatic juice of the same patient.

Patients with low levels of both miR-205 and miR-210 appeared less likely to have lymph node metastasis than patients with high levels of both miR-205 and miR-210 Additional File 1: Supplementary Table S4). Patients with low levels of miR-205 also tended to have well to moderately differentiated tumors (P = 0.001) (Additional File 1: Supplementary Table S4).

Discussion

Elevated levels of microRNAs have been detected in precursor lesions of pancreatic cancer and were also associated with poorer survival of pancreatic cancer patients (26, 27. Our results indicate that miR-205, miR-210, miR-492, and miR-1247 in pancreatic juice are candidate biomarkers of PDAC, which perform even better when combined with serum CA19-9 levels. We also found that expression of these 4 miRNAs is associated with decreased OS in patients with PDAC. In addition, elevated amount of miR-205 and miR-210 was associated with lymph node metastasis, and expression of miR-205 was associated with poorly differentiated tumors, both indicators of worse prognosis. These findings suggest that pancreatic juice levels of miR-205, miR-210, miR-492, and miR-1247, as a combined signature can predict the clinical outcome of patients with PDAC. Microarray analyses identified 49 miRNAs as differentially enriched in the pancreatic juice of patients with PDAC compared with controls; of these, miR-200a, miR-200b, and miR-30b have also been found to be upregulated in PDAC cells and tumor tissue 28. In addition, high expression of miR-205 was found in head and neck cancer cell lines 29, squamous cell carcinoma cell lines 30, and cervical cancer cell lines 31, as well as in clinical samples of metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma 32, cervical cancer 31, non-small cell lung cancer 33, and endometrial cancer 34. Expression of miR-205 in clinical prostate cancer samples was associated with prostate cancer progression 35 and invasive bladder cancers 36. Up-regulation of miR-205 was also found to precede phenotypic changes in ductal cells in a conditional KRAS (G12D) mouse model of pancreatic cancer 27. Aberrant high expression of miR-210 has been detected in many tumors 26, 37-42., Elevated miR-210 has been implicated in tumor progression 43 and is associated with negative clinical outcomes 26, 41, 42. Interestingly, increased plasma miR-210 levels were associated with lymph node metastases and trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer patients 44. These findings are to some extent consistent with our current observation that high miR-205 and miR-210 levels in pancreatic juice correlate with decreased OS, poorly differentiated tumors, and lymph node metastasis. These observations make a compelling case for miR-205 and miR-210 in pancreatic juice as informative biomarkers for PDAC. A recent study has reported miR-1247 to be down-regulated in pancreatic cancer correlating with tumor grade and shorter overall survival of the patients 45. miR-492 has also been shown to potentially play an important role in the progression of malignant embryonal liver tumors 46. Although our study did not reveal significant differences in the levels of these miRNAs between CP and PDAC, it is plausible that this was due to relatively small sample size and thus lack of enough statistical power in the current study. However, in view of these miRNAs discriminating PDAC from NPNH controls with reasonably high sensitivity and specificity as well as showing significant correlation with decreased OS and lymph node metastasis, it is important that the miRNA signature be investigated in a larger patient population in the future. The current finding of the four miRNAs signature in pancreatic juice as a biomarker panel of pancreatic cancer suggest that these miRNAs are involved in critical cancer relevant genetic networks deregulated in PDAC. Collection of pancreatic juice is a minimally invasive procedure which can easily detect circulating or secreted miRNAs as concentrations of miRNAs are higher than in blood (serum or plasma). This is important as circulating miRNAs in blood can potentially decrease over time whereas they can be still detectable in pancreatic juice. For detection of early PDAC, this procedure will be preferable as concentrations of miRNAs will be higher in pancreatic juice than in blood. Moreover, our technique can be used as part of routine diagnostic procedure to establish diagnosis/staging of PDAC and does not involve cannulation of pancreatic duct to collect pancreatic juice. Finally, we recognize that the procedure is expensive if secretin is used and more invasive unlike detecting miRNAs in blood., The collection and storage procedures need to be standardized for a broader applicability of this technique. It is important to have stringent quality control standards for collection of pancreatic juice and pancreatic juice miRNAs expression analysis besides ensuring that sample size is adequate for selecting the most informative candidate biomarker miRNAs capable of discriminating patients with pancreatic cancer, pancreatitis versus no pancreatic disease. In summary, our study demonstrates that miRNAs in exocrine pancreatic secretions are promising biomarkers of PDAC. Further comprehensive molecular and functional characterizations of miRNAs circulating at altered levels in pancreatic juice are warranted to elucidate the role of these miRNAs in pancreatic carcinogenesis and validate them in larger sample cohorts as biomarker panels for detection, prognosis as well as response to therapy for this highly lethal malignancy. Supplementary Tables S1-S4. Click here for additional data file.
  46 in total

1.  Plasma microRNA 210 levels correlate with sensitivity to trastuzumab and tumor presence in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Jung; Libero Santarpia; Juyeon Kim; Francisco J Esteva; Erica Moretti; Aman U Buzdar; Angelo Di Leo; Xiao-Feng Le; Robert C Bast; Soon-Tae Park; Lajos Pusztai; George A Calin
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Detection of differentially expressed microRNAs in serum of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients: miR-196a could be a potential marker for poor prognosis.

Authors:  Xiangyu Kong; Yiqi Du; Guokun Wang; Jun Gao; Yanfang Gong; Lei Li; Zhuo Zhang; Jiaqi Zhu; Qing Jing; Yongwen Qin; Zhaoshen Li
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  MicroRNA-492 is processed from the keratin 19 gene and up-regulated in metastatic hepatoblastoma.

Authors:  Julia von Frowein; Philipp Pagel; Roland Kappler; Dietrich von Schweinitz; Adelbert Roscher; Irene Schmid
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 5.  Molecular pathogenesis of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Nirav Thosani; Chandra S Dasari; Manoop S Bhutani; Massimo Raimondo; Sushovan Guha
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Characterization of microRNAs in serum: a novel class of biomarkers for diagnosis of cancer and other diseases.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Yi Ba; Lijia Ma; Xing Cai; Yuan Yin; Kehui Wang; Jigang Guo; Yujing Zhang; Jiangning Chen; Xing Guo; Qibin Li; Xiaoying Li; Wenjing Wang; Yan Zhang; Jin Wang; Xueyuan Jiang; Yang Xiang; Chen Xu; Pingping Zheng; Juanbin Zhang; Ruiqiang Li; Hongjie Zhang; Xiaobin Shang; Ting Gong; Guang Ning; Jun Wang; Ke Zen; Junfeng Zhang; Chen-Yu Zhang
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 25.617

7.  MicroRNA-21 is induced early in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma precursor lesions.

Authors:  Maël Chalret du Rieu; Jérôme Torrisani; Janick Selves; Talal Al Saati; Anny Souque; Marlène Dufresne; Gregory J Tsongalis; Arief A Suriawinata; Nicolas Carrère; Louis Buscail; Pierre Cordelier
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 8.327

8.  S100A6 is increased in a stepwise manner during pancreatic carcinogenesis: clinical value of expression analysis in 98 pancreatic juice samples.

Authors:  Kenoki Ohuchida; Kazuhiro Mizumoto; Jun Yu; Hiroshi Yamaguchi; Hiroyuki Konomi; Eishi Nagai; Koji Yamaguchi; Masazumi Tsuneyoshi; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Aberrant expression of oncogenic and tumor-suppressive microRNAs in cervical cancer is required for cancer cell growth.

Authors:  Xiaohong Wang; Shuang Tang; Shu-Yun Le; Robert Lu; Janet S Rader; Craig Meyers; Zhi-Ming Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  miR-210 links hypoxia with cell cycle regulation and is deleted in human epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Antonis Giannakakis; Raphael Sandaltzopoulos; Joel Greshock; Shun Liang; Jia Huang; Kosei Hasegawa; Chunsheng Li; Ann O'Brien-Jenkins; Dionyssios Katsaros; Barbara L Weber; Celeste Simon; George Coukos; Lin Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 4.742

View more
  54 in total

1.  Endoscopic Ultrasonography: From the Origins to Routine EUS.

Authors:  Eugene P DiMagno; Matthew J DiMagno
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  MiRNA-1469 promotes lung cancer cells apoptosis through targeting STAT5a.

Authors:  Chengshan Xu; Ling Zhang; Hengheng Li; Zhihua Liu; Lianning Duan; Chengrong Lu
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 3.  Cell-free microRNAs in blood and other body fluids, as cancer biomarkers.

Authors:  Blanca Ortiz-Quintero
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 4.  Endoscopic Pancreas Fluid Collection: Methods and Relevance for Clinical Care and Translational Science.

Authors:  Phil A Hart; Mark Topazian; Massimo Raimondo; Zobeida Cruz-Monserrate; William E Fisher; Gregory B Lesinski; Hanno Steen; Darwin L Conwell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Clinical implications of miRNAs in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and therapy of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Satyanarayana Rachagani; Muzafar A Macha; Nicholas Heimann; Parthasarathy Seshacharyulu; Dhanya Haridas; Seema Chugh; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 15.470

6.  Methylated DNA in Pancreatic Juice Distinguishes Patients With Pancreatic Cancer From Controls.

Authors:  Shounak Majumder; Massimo Raimondo; William R Taylor; Tracy C Yab; Calise K Berger; Brian A Dukek; Xiaoming Cao; Patrick H Foote; Chung Wah Wu; Mary E Devens; Douglas W Mahoney; Thomas C Smyrk; Rahul Pannala; Suresh T Chari; Santhi Swaroop Vege; Mark D Topazian; Bret T Petersen; Michael J Levy; Elizabeth Rajan; Ferga C Gleeson; Barham Abu Dayyeh; Cuong C Nguyen; Douglas O Faigel; Timothy A Woodward; Michael B Wallace; Gloria Petersen; Hatim T Allawi; Graham P Lidgard; John B Kisiel; David A Ahlquist
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 11.382

7.  microRNA-218 suppresses the proliferation, invasion and promotes apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells by targeting HMGB1.

Authors:  Zhe Liu; Yuanhong Xu; Jin Long; Kejian Guo; Chunlin Ge; Ruixia Du
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 8.  Circulating RNAs as new biomarkers for detecting pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Takahiro Kishikawa; Motoyuki Otsuka; Motoko Ohno; Takeshi Yoshikawa; Akemi Takata; Kazuhiko Koike
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  MicroRNA in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its precursor lesions.

Authors:  Yasmin G Hernandez; Aimee L Lucas
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-01-15

10.  Noninvasive urinary miRNA biomarkers for early detection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Silvana Debernardi; Nathalie J Massat; Tomasz P Radon; Ajanthah Sangaralingam; Ana Banissi; Darren P Ennis; Thomas Dowe; Claude Chelala; Stephen P Pereira; Hemant M Kocher; Bryan D Young; Giles Bond-Smith; Robert Hutchins; Tatjana Crnogorac-Jurcevic
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 6.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.