| Literature DB >> 25258620 |
A Nithya Deva Krupa1, Vimala Raghavan1.
Abstract
Marine biofilms formed due to adhesion of bacteria and other microorganisms on submerged surfaces are generally considered to be a major form of microfouling. Subsequent attachment of larvae of higher organisms like barnacles, mussels, and so forth, on marine biofilms, causes macrofouling. Several approaches have been used to prevent micro- and macrofouling. Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) are known to exhibit strong inhibitory and antimicrobial activity. Biological synthesis of AgNPs is rapidly gaining importance due to its growing success. Hence, the present study is focused on the biosynthesis of AgNPs using fruit extract of Aegle marmelos and its characterization through UV-Vis spectrophotometer, X-ray diffractometer (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Further isolation and identification of marine biofilm forming bacteria were carried out through 16S rDNA analysis. The antimicrofouling effect of the biosynthesized AgNPs was tested against marine biofilm forming bacteria and the results suggested that it could effectively inhibit biofilm formation. This preliminary study has proved that AgNPs may be used as antimicrofouling agent for the prevention of biofouling in the early stages.Entities:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25258620 PMCID: PMC4165872 DOI: 10.1155/2014/949538
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinorg Chem Appl Impact factor: 7.778
Figure 1UV-Vis spectrum of AgNPs synthesized using fruit extract of A. marmelos: (a) control; (b) after 12 h; (c) after 24 h.
Figure 2X-ray diffraction pattern of synthesized AgNPs.
Figure 3FTIR spectrum of fruit extract of A. marmelos treated with 1 mM AgNO3.
Figure 4Atomic force microscopic images of the synthesized AgNPs: (a) aerial view showing topographical characteristics; (b) 3D view.
Antibacterial activity of AgNPs against marine biofilm forming bacteria.
| S. number | Organism | Concentration of AgNPs ( | Zone of inhibition (mm) (mean of the three replicates) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 20 | 5.0 ± 0.12 |
| 40 | 7.6 ± 1.23 | ||
| 60 | 8.5 ± 0.14 | ||
| 80 | 12.0 ± 0.57 | ||
| Control | 0 | ||
|
| |||
| 2 |
| 20 | 5.2 ± 0.76 |
| 40 | 8.3 ± 0.54 | ||
| 60 | 9.6 ± 1.14 | ||
| 80 | 10.7 ± 0.21 | ||
| Control | 0 | ||
|
| |||
| 3 |
| 20 | 4.0 ± 0.67 |
| 40 | 5.3 ± 0.80 | ||
| 60 | 6.1 ± 1.71 | ||
| 80 | 9.0 ± 1.20 | ||
| Control | 0 | ||
|
| |||
| 4 |
| 20 | 3.0 ± 0.92 |
| 40 | 4.9 ± 0.60 | ||
| 60 | 6.7 ± 0.72 | ||
| 80 | 7.2 ± 0.48 | ||
| Control | 0 | ||
|
| |||
| 5 |
| 20 | 2.1 ± 0.91 |
| 40 | 3.2 ± 0.32 | ||
| 60 | 5.0 ± 1.30 | ||
| 80 | 6.1 ± 1.42 | ||
| Control | 0 | ||
Figure 5The effect of biosynthesized AgNPs on EPS production by marine biofilm forming bacteria.
Figure 6Antibiofilm activity of AgNPs on marine biofilm forming bacteria.