| Literature DB >> 25258574 |
Joon Ho Moon1, Ji Ho Kim2, Hyung-Jun Im3, Dong Soo Lee3, Eun Jung Park1, Kilyoung Song1, Hyun Ju Oh1, Su Bin Hyun2, Sang Chul Kang2, Hyunil Kim2, Hyo Eun Moon4, Hyung Woo Park4, Hong Jae Lee5, Eun Ji Kim6, Seokjoong Kim6, Byeong Chun Lee7, Sun Ha Paek4.
Abstract
Destruction of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) is a common pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease (PD). Characteristics of PD patients include bradykinesia, muscle rigidity, tremor at rest and disturbances in balance. For about four decades, PD animal models have been produced by toxin-induced or gene-modified techniques. However, in mice, none of the gene-modified models showed all 4 major criteria of PD. Moreover, distinguishing between PD model pigs and normal pigs has not been well established. Therefore, we planned to produce a pig model for PD by chronic subcutaneous administration of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), neurotoxin. Changes in behavioral patterns of pigs were thoroughly evaluated and a new motor scoring system was established for this porcine model that was based on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in human PD patients. In summary, this motor scoring system could be helpful to analyze the porcine PD model and to confirm the pathology prior to further examinations, such as positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), which is expensive, and invasive immunohistochemistry (IHC) of the brain.Entities:
Keywords: 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP); Parkinson's disease; pig; scoring analysis
Year: 2014 PMID: 25258574 PMCID: PMC4174618 DOI: 10.5607/en.2014.23.3.258
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Neurobiol ISSN: 1226-2560 Impact factor: 3.261
Proposed motor scoring system for a porcine PD model based on the Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) in human PD patients
Fig. 1Chronic changes of motor scores in a miniature pig with MPTP administered chronically by subcutaneous injection. According to the scoring analysis for pigs that was based on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), scores were increased in a time-dependent manner after subcutaneous MPTP administration. MPTP was injected into the miniature pig subcutaneously, at the center of the first tits under the umbilicus, 25 times with a total amount of 18.5 mg/kg. Daily injection amounts were 0.5 mg/kg of MPTP (10 times), 0.7 mg/kg (5 times) and 1.0 mg/kg (10 times), all at 2~3 day intervals. Of several MPTP-induced pigs, only one was subjected to scoring analysis because the other MPTP-induced miniature pigs died before completing scoring analysis. This made it difficult to interpret the scoring data. When MPTP-treated pigs were compared to normal miniature pigs up to 78 days after MPTP injection, no abnormal behaviors were observed. However, from that day when the total accumulated amount of MPTP injected exceeded 14 mg/kg and scoring numbers exceeded '11', the MPTP-induced pig gradually started to exhibit abnormal behaviors, including collapse, circling behavior, drooling, seizure and hind limb paralysis.
Fig. 2MRI and CT images. (A) and (B) are MRI images and (C) and (D) are CT images. Brain images of an MPTP-treated PD model pig are (A) and (C), control images are (B) and (D). In both MRI and CT images, no evidence of differences was found in brain regions. However, frontal sinus mucoceles were observed in the control pig which are indicated by red arrows.
Fig. 3[18F]FP-CIT (images A to F) and 18F-FDG PET (G to L). [18F]FP-CIT uptake was markedly decreased at the bilateral putamen of the MPTP-treated pig (A, C and E, PET, fusion PET/CT and CT image, respectively). However, [18F]FP-CIT uptake was symmetrically visualized in the same area of a normal pig (B, D and F, PET, fusion PET/CT and CT image, respectively). The BPnd of both putamens of the MPTP-treated pig were 0.49 (right) and 0.63 (left). In contrast, BPnd of both putamens of a normal pig were 1.25 (right) and 1.10 (left). Regional brain metabolism was assessed and compared visually between the MPTP-induced PD pig model (G, I and K) and a normal pig (H, J and L) by 18F-FDG PET images. There was no significant difference in cortical metabolism but slight hypometabolism was noted in the bilateral putaminal area in the MPTP-induced PD pig model (arrow).
Fig. 4Results of IHC. Brain images of an MPTP-induced PD model pig are shown in (A and C); (C) is a magnified picture from the rectangled area in figure (A). (B and D) are brain images from a negative control pig. (D) is a magnified picture from the rectangled area in figure (B). Numbers of positive cells in SNpc were significantly decreased in the MPTP-treated pig compared to a negative control pig. IHC. (A and B): ×20; (C and D): ×40.