Literature DB >> 25258423

Fetal echocardiography for congenital heart disease diagnosis: a meta-analysis, power analysis and missing data analysis.

Hong Liu1, Jie Zhou2, Qiao-Ling Feng3, Hai-Tao Gu4, Gang Wan5, Huo-Ming Zhang6, Yong-Jun Xie7, Xiao-Song Li8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prenatal ultrasonography is the most widely available diagnostic test for fetal congenital heart disease (CHD), but the factors influencing its diagnostic accuracy remain uncertain despite extensive research. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the potential role of demographic, clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics on diagnostic yields for detecting CHD.
METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, ISI Web of Science, SinoMed, and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify studies assessing the accuracy of prenatal ultrasound in the detection of CHD. A random effects model was used to generate pooled sensitivity and specificity in addition to summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves.
RESULTS: Overall, prenatal ultrasound in the detection of CHD had a moderate sensitivity of 68.1% (95% CI 59.6-75.5) and a favorable specificity of 99.9% (99.7-99.9). Risk level and gestation age were independent predictors of diagnostic performance for detecting CHD (p = 0.004 vs. p = 0.002, respectively). The pooled sensitivities significantly increased to varying extents with the following echocardiographic views: 48.7% (34.8-67.2) for four-chamber view (4CV); 58.0% (40.3-73.9) for a combination of 4CV and outflow tract views (OTV); 73.5% (59.2-84.1) for combination of 4CV, OTV and three vessels and trachea view (3VTV); 77.1% (62.0-87.5) for extensive cardiac echocardiography examination (ECEE); and 89.6% (81.0-94.6) for spatiotemporal image correlation (STIC).
CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal ultrasound is a powerful tool for the diagnosis of CHD; however, a single ultrasonographic regime is not definitive on its own and must be interpreted in the context of demographic and clinical characteristics. © The European Society of Cardiology 2014.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Heart defect; congenital; echocardiography; fetus; pediatrics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25258423     DOI: 10.1177/2047487314551547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol        ISSN: 2047-4873            Impact factor:   7.804


  9 in total

1.  Cardiovascular cast model fabrication and casting effectiveness evaluation in fetus with severe congenital heart disease or normal heart.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Hai-Yan Cao; Ming-Xing Xie; Lin He; Wei Han; Liu Hong; Yuan Peng; Yun-Fei Hu; Ben-Cai Song; Jing Wang; Bin Wang; Cheng Deng
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-04-13

Review 2.  Circulating microRNAs as potential biomarkers for diagnosis of congenital heart defects.

Authors:  Wan-Qin Xie; Lin Zhou; Yong Chen; Bin Ni
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2016

3.  Fetal echocardiography (ECHO) in assessment of structural heart defects in congenital diaphragmatic hernia patients: Is early postnatal ECHO necessary for ECMO candidacy?

Authors:  Candace C Style; Oluyinka O Olutoye; Mariatu A Verla; Keila N Lopez; Adam M Vogel; Patricio E Lau; Stephanie M Cruz; Jimmy Espinoza; Caraciolo J Fernandes; Sundeep G Keswani; Timothy C Lee
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 2.545

4.  Fetal cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging in utero.

Authors:  Jerome Chaptinel; Jerome Yerly; Yvan Mivelaz; Milan Prsa; Leonor Alamo; Yvan Vial; Gregoire Berchier; Chantal Rohner; François Gudinchet; Matthias Stuber
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The Additional Role of the 3-Vessels and Trachea View in Screening for Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Roxana Gireadă; Demetra Socolov; Elena Mihălceanu; Roxana Matasariu; Alexandra Ursache; Mona Akad; Iuliana Bujor; Ioana Scripcariu; Radu Florin Popa; Răzvan Socolov
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Impact of clinical research on public health policy of neonatal screening for congenital heart disease in China.

Authors:  Miao Yang; Youping Tian; Pin Jia; Xiaojing Ma; Xiaoling Ge; Xiaojing Hu; Quming Zhao; Fang Liu; Bing Jia; Weili Yan; Qing Gu; Guoying Huang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2022-06-05       Impact factor: 6.133

7.  Effectiveness of fetal ultrasound diagnostics in cardiac malformations and association with polyhydramnios and oligohydramnios.

Authors:  Atene Simonyi; Fanni Rebeka Eros; Julia Hajdu; Artur Beke
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-07

8.  Can echocardiographic screening in the early days of life detect critical congenital heart disease among apparently healthy newborns?

Authors:  Miyuki Kondo; Akira Ohishi; Toru Baba; Tomoka Fujita; Shigeo Iijima
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Can Fetal Echocardiographic Measurements of the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Angle Detect Fetuses with Conotruncal Cardiac Anomalies?

Authors:  Alona Raucher Sternfeld; Tal Betzer; Akiva Tamir; Yossi Mizrachi; Sagie Assa; Jacob Bar; Liat Gindes
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.