Literature DB >> 25258286

Suspect and nontarget screening approaches to identify organic contaminant records in lake sediments.

Aurea C Chiaia-Hernandez1, Emma L Schymanski, Praveen Kumar, Heinz P Singer, Juliane Hollender.   

Abstract

Sediment cores provide a valuable record of historical contamination, but so far, new analytical techniques such as high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) have not yet been applied to extend target screening to the detection of unknown contaminants for this complex matrix. Here, a combination of target, suspect, and nontarget screening using liquid chromatography (LC)-HRMS/MS was performed on extracts from sediment cores obtained from Lake Greifensee and Lake Lugano located in the north and south of Switzerland, respectively. A suspect list was compiled from consumption data and refined using the expected method coverage and a combination of automated and manual filters on the resulting measured data. Nontarget identification efforts were focused on masses with Cl and Br isotope information available that exhibited mass defects outside the sample matrix, to reduce the effect of analytical interferences. In silico methods combining the software MOLGEN-MS/MS and MetFrag were used for direct elucidation, with additional consideration of retention time/partitioning information and the number of references for a given substance. The combination of all available information resulted in the successful identification of three suspect (chlorophene, flufenamic acid, lufenuron) and two nontarget compounds (hexachlorophene, flucofuron), confirmed with reference standards, as well as the tentative identification of two chlorophene congeners (dichlorophene, bromochlorophene) that exhibited similar time trends through the sediment cores. This study demonstrates that complementary application of target, suspect, and nontarget screening can deliver valuable information despite the matrix complexity and provide records of historical contamination in two Swiss lakes with previously unreported compounds.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25258286     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-014-8166-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  11 in total

1.  A comparison of three liquid chromatography (LC) retention time prediction models.

Authors:  Andrew D McEachran; Kamel Mansouri; Seth R Newton; Brandiese E J Beverly; Jon R Sobus; Antony J Williams
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 6.057

2.  Integrated Framework for Identifying Toxic Transformation Products in Complex Environmental Mixtures.

Authors:  Leah Chibwe; Ivan A Titaley; Eunha Hoh; Staci L Massey Simonich
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2017-01-04

3.  The Eco-Exposome Concept: Supporting an Integrated Assessment of Mixtures of Environmental Chemicals.

Authors:  Stefan Scholz; John W Nichols; Beate I Escher; Gerald T Ankley; Rolf Altenburger; Brett Blackwell; Werner Brack; Lawrence Burkhard; Timothy W Collette; Jon A Doering; Drew Ekman; Kellie Fay; Fabian Fischer; Jörg Hackermüller; Joel C Hoffman; Chih Lai; David Leuthold; Dalma Martinovic-Weigelt; Thorsten Reemtsma; Nathan Pollesch; Anthony Schroeder; Gerrit Schüürmann; Martin von Bergen
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 4.218

Review 4.  Exposure science in an age of rapidly changing climate: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Judy S LaKind; Jonathan Overpeck; Patrick N Breysse; Lorrie Backer; Susan D Richardson; Jon Sobus; Amir Sapkota; Crystal R Upperman; Chengsheng Jiang; C Ben Beard; J M Brunkard; Jesse E Bell; Ryan Harris; Jean-Paul Chretien; Richard E Peltier; Ginger L Chew; Benjamin C Blount
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Integrating ion mobility spectrometry into mass spectrometry-based exposome measurements: what can it add and how far can it go?

Authors:  Thomas O Metz; Erin S Baker; Emma L Schymanski; Ryan S Renslow; Dennis G Thomas; Tim J Causon; Ian K Webb; Stephan Hann; Richard D Smith; Justin G Teeguarden
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.681

6.  patRoon: open source software platform for environmental mass spectrometry based non-target screening.

Authors:  Rick Helmus; Thomas L Ter Laak; Annemarie P van Wezel; Pim de Voogt; Emma L Schymanski
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 5.514

7.  Non-target time trend screening: a data reduction strategy for detecting emerging contaminants in biological samples.

Authors:  Merle M Plassmann; Erik Tengstrand; K Magnus Åberg; Jonathan P Benskin
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.142

8.  MetFrag relaunched: incorporating strategies beyond in silico fragmentation.

Authors:  Christoph Ruttkies; Emma L Schymanski; Sebastian Wolf; Juliane Hollender; Steffen Neumann
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 5.514

Review 9.  Mass spectrometric strategies for the investigation of biomarkers of illicit drug use in wastewater.

Authors:  Félix Hernández; Sara Castiglioni; Adrian Covaci; Pim de Voogt; Erik Emke; Barbara Kasprzyk-Hordern; Christoph Ort; Malcolm Reid; Juan V Sancho; Kevin V Thomas; Alexander L N van Nuijs; Ettore Zuccato; Lubertus Bijlsma
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 10.946

10.  Target, suspect and non-target screening analysis from wastewater treatment plant effluents to drinking water using collision cross section values as additional identification criterion.

Authors:  Vanessa Hinnenkamp; Peter Balsaa; Torsten C Schmidt
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.142

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.