Katrin Lorenz1, Barbara Noack, Nancy Herrmann, Thomas Hoffmann. 1. Department of Periodontology, Technische Universität Dresden, UniversitätsZahnMedizin, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany, katrin.lorenz@tu-dresden.de.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: It was the aim to investigate experimental mouth rinses concerning their tooth and tongue staining potential using the standardized short-term forced staining model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single centre, clinically controlled, randomized, investigator-blinded study was conducted in a crossover design. In healthy dental students, three experimental AmF/SnF2 (A, B, C) mouth rinses and a phenolic/essential oil rinse (D) were compared to a water control (E). Four treatment days consisted of eight hourly rinses with mouth rinse and black tea. Mechanical oral hygiene was ceased. At the fifth day, tooth and tongue staining indices were recorded. Between treatment periods, a 10-day washout phase was performed. RESULTS:Twenty-eight participants entered and completed the study. All mouth rinses including the water control led to tooth and tongue staining. Most tooth staining occurred after rinsing with test rinse A, followed by B, D, C and E. Statistically significant differences existed between products A and C, D, and E. Most tongue staining happened in group B, followed by A, D, C and E (not statistically significant). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the model, mouth rinse C has a promising potential of causing less tooth discoloration than other AmF/SnF2 rinses. C is highly recommended to be investigated in further long-term clinical studies on its in vivo staining potential and antiplaque efficacy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This forced staining study has proven that one of the experimental AmF/SnF2 rinses leads to less staining than the other experimental AmF/SnF2 rinses. These experimental results have to be confirmed by further clinical investigations.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: It was the aim to investigate experimental mouth rinses concerning their tooth and tongue staining potential using the standardized short-term forced staining model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single centre, clinically controlled, randomized, investigator-blinded study was conducted in a crossover design. In healthy dental students, three experimental AmF/SnF2 (A, B, C) mouth rinses and a phenolic/essential oil rinse (D) were compared to a water control (E). Four treatment days consisted of eight hourly rinses with mouth rinse and black tea. Mechanical oral hygiene was ceased. At the fifth day, tooth and tongue staining indices were recorded. Between treatment periods, a 10-day washout phase was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight participants entered and completed the study. All mouth rinses including the water control led to tooth and tongue staining. Most tooth staining occurred after rinsing with test rinse A, followed by B, D, C and E. Statistically significant differences existed between products A and C, D, and E. Most tongue staining happened in group B, followed by A, D, C and E (not statistically significant). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the model, mouth rinse C has a promising potential of causing less tooth discoloration than other AmF/SnF2 rinses. C is highly recommended to be investigated in further long-term clinical studies on its in vivo staining potential and antiplaque efficacy. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This forced staining study has proven that one of the experimental AmF/SnF2 rinses leads to less staining than the other experimental AmF/SnF2 rinses. These experimental results have to be confirmed by further clinical investigations.
Authors: S Paraskevas; P A Versteeg; M F Timmerman; U Van der Velden; G A Van der Weijden Journal: J Clin Periodontol Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 8.728
Authors: Nicola Xania West; Martin Addy; Robert Newcombe; Emma Macdonald; Alison Chapman; Maria Davies; John Moran; Nicholas Claydon Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2011-05-26 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: Daniëlle A C Van Strydonck; Dagmar E Slot; Ubele Van der Velden; Fridus Van der Weijden Journal: J Clin Periodontol Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 8.728