| Literature DB >> 25257532 |
Zhiguo Zhang1, Changheng Song2, Xiaowei Fu3, Meijie Liu4, Yan Li5, Jinghua Pan6, Hong Liu7, Shaojun Wang8, Lihua Xiang9, Gary Guishan Xiao10, Dahong Ju11.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate effect of diosgenin (DG) on rats that had osteoporosis-like features induced by ovariectomy (OVX). Seventy-two six-month-old female Wistar rats were subjected to either ovariectomy (n = 60) or Sham operation (SHAM group, n = 12). Beginning at one week post-ovariectomy, the OVX rats were treated with vehicle (OVX group, n = 12), estradiol valerate (EV group, n = 12), or DG at three doses (DG-L, -M, -H group, n = 12, respectively). After a 12-week treatment, administration of EV or DG-H inhibited OVX-induced weight gain, and administration of EV or DG-H or DG-M had a significantly uterotrophic effect. Bone mineral density (BMD) and indices of bone histomorphometry of tibia were measured. Levels of protein and mRNA expression of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand (RANKL) in tibia were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. Our results show that DG at a high dose (DG-H) had a significant anti-osteoporotic effect compared to OVX control. DG-H treatment down-regulated expression of RANKL and up-regulated expression of OPG significantly in tibia from OVX rats compared to control, and thus lowered the RANKL/OPG ratio. This suggests that the anti-osteoporotic effect of DG might be associated with modulating the RANKL/OPG ratio and DG had potential to be developed as alternative therapeutic agents of osteoporosis induced by postmenopause.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25257532 PMCID: PMC4200779 DOI: 10.3390/ijms150917130
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Comparison of body weight and uterine weight among groups after 12-week treatment.
| Group |
| Body Weight (g) | Uterine Weight (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 12 | 324 + 18 | 830 ± 20 |
| OVX | 12 | 439 + 33 a | 226 ± 12 a |
| OVX + EV | 12 | 317 + 22 c | 535 ± 18 ac |
| OVX + DG-L | 12 | 398 + 25 ad | 251 ± 11 a |
| OVX + DG-M | 12 | 381 + 14 ac | 282 ± 13 ad |
| OVX + DG-H | 12 | 363 + 16 ac | 353 ± 15 ad |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). a p < 0.01 vs. Sham group; c p < 0.01 vs. OVX group; d p < 0.05 vs. OVX group.
Figure 1Effects of diosgenin on femoral bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), and projected bone area (AREA) in ovariectomy (OVX) rats. After 12-weektreatment, femurs were dissected free of soft tissue. The BMD (A); BMC (B); and AREA (C)of the femur were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results are means± S.D. (n = 12 rats/group). a, p < 0.01 vs. Sham group; b, p < 0.05 vs. Sham group; c, p < 0.01 vs. OVX group; d, p < 0.05 vs. OVX group.
Figure 2Effects of diosgenin on trabecular bone. Trabecular bone was visualized by using methylene blue staining. The red arrow indicates trabecular bone.
Comparison of indices of bone histomorphometry among groups.
| Group |
| BV/TV (%) | ES/BS (%) | MS/BS (%) | MAR (μm/day) | O.Th (μm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sham | 12 | 26.09 ± 2.66 | 2.35 ± 0.78 | 4.16 ± 0.72 | 0.95 ± 0.19 | 2.20 ± 0.46 |
| OVX | 12 | 15.15 ± 3.55 a | 10.35 ± 1.60 a | 9.57 ± 1.53 a | 2.16 ± 0.27 a | 3.55 ± 0.58 a |
| OVX + EV | 12 | 23.10 ± 2.86 c | 2.44 ± 0.94 c | 4.54 ± 1.02 c | 1.06 ± 0.17 c | 2.56 ± 0.33 bc |
| OVX + DG-L | 12 | 16.08 ± 3.89 a | 9.51 ± 2.11 a | 9.15 ± 1.43 a | 2.06 ± 0.31 a | 3.44 ± 0.70 a |
| OVX + DG-M | 12 | 17.74 ± 4.42 a | 8.47 ± 1.86 a | 8.75 ± 1.32 a | 1.92 ± 0.29 a | 3.37 ± 0.55 a |
| OVX + DG-H | 12 | 19.93 ± 3.71 ac | 5.22 ± 0.88 ac | 6.01 ± 0.83ac | 1.67 ± 0.33 ad | 3.13 ± 0.71 a |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). a p < 0.01 vs. Sham group; b p < 0.05 vs. Sham group; c p < 0.01 vs. OVX group; d p < 0.05 vs. OVX group.
Figure 3Effects of 12 weeks treatment on expression of OPG and RANKL mRNA in tibiae of rats. Expression level of OPG and RANKL mRNA was estimated by using in situ hybridization. (A) OPG mRNA expression; (B) RANKL mRNA expression, and (C) mRNA ratio of RANKL/OPG are shown. In panel (C), a, p < 0.01 vs. Sham group; b, p < 0.05 vs. Sham group; c, p < 0.01 vs. OVX group; d, p < 0.05 vs. OVX group.
Figure 4Effects of 12 weeks treatment on expression of OPG and RANKL protein in tibiae of rats. Expression level of OPG and RANKL protein was estimated by immunohistochemical analysis. (A) OPG expression; (B) RANKL expression; and (C) Ratio of RANKL/OPG are shown. In panel (C), a, p < 0.01 vs. Sham group; b, p < 0.05 vs. Sham group; c, p < 0.01 vs. OVX group; d, p < 0.05 vs. OVX group.
The primer sequence used in the experiments (BORSTER, Wuhan, China).
| Target | Genbank ID | Primer Sequence (5'-3') |
|---|---|---|
| OPG | NM_012870 | Forward: 5'-TGGACAACCCAGGAAACCTTTCCTCCAAAA-3' |
| Reverse: 5'-TTTGCCTGGGACCAAAGTGAATGCAGAGAG-3' | ||
| Probe: 5'-AGAAATGATAGGGAATCAGGTTCAATCAGT-3' | ||
| RANKL | NM_057149 | Forward: 5'-GCCAGCCGAGACTACGGCAAGTACCTGCGC-3' |
| Reverse: 5'-GGCCAGGTGGTCTGCAGCATCGCTCTGTTC-3' | ||
| Probe: 5'-TTTATAGAATCCTGAGACTCCATGAAAACG-3' |