Literature DB >> 25256129

Sphincter preservation rates after radical resection for rectal cancer in the United States veteran population: opportunity for improvement in early disease.

Somala Mohammed1, Daniel A Anaya, Samir S Awad, Daniel Albo, David H Berger, Avo Artinyan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sphincter preservation (SP) is an important goal of rectal cancer surgery. We hypothesized that SP rates among veteran patients have increased and are comparable to national rates, and that a subset of patients with early disease still undergo non-SP procedures.
METHODS: Patients with nonmetastatic primary rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent curative-intent rectal resection were identified from the Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry (VACCR) database (1995-2010). SP trends over time were described and compared to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) population. Subset analysis was performed in patients with nonirradiated, pathologic stage 0-I rectal cancers, a population that may qualify for novel SP strategies.
RESULTS: Of 5,145 study patients, 3,509 (68 %) underwent SP surgery. The VACCR SP rate increased from 59.9 % in 1995-1999 to 79.3 % in 2005-2010, when it exceeded that of SEER (76.9 %, p = 0.023). On multivariate analysis, recent time period was independently associated with higher likelihood of SP (odds ratio [OR] 2.64, p < 0.001). Preoperative radiotherapy (OR 0.51, p < 0.001) and higher pathologic stage (OR 0.37, stage III, p < 0.001) were negative predictors. In patients with nonirradiated pathologic stage 0-I cancers, SP rates also increased, but 25 % of these patients underwent non-SP procedures. Within this subset, patients with clinical stage 0 and I disease still had significant rates of abdominoperineal resection (7.7 and 17.0 %, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: SP rates among veterans have increased and surpass national rates. However, an unacceptable proportion of patients with stage 0-I rectal cancers still undergo non-SP procedures. Multimodal treatment with local excision may further improve SP rates in this subset of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25256129     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4101-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  11 in total

1.  The influence of specific technical maneuvers utilized in the creation of diverting loop-ileostomies on stoma-related morbidity.

Authors:  Masaaki Miyo; Ichiro Takemasa; Masataka Ikeda; Masaki Tujie; Junichi Hasegawa; Masayuki Ohue; Takeshi Kato; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Transanal TATA/TME: a case-matched study of taTME versus laparoscopic TME surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J H Marks; G A Montenegro; J F Salem; M V Shields; G J Marks
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Ongoing ostomy self-care challenges of long-term rectal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Joanna E Bulkley; Carmit K McMullen; Marcia Grant; Christopher Wendel; Mark C Hornbrook; Robert S Krouse
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Safety and Feasibility of Umbilical Diverting Loop Ileostomy for Patients with Rectal Tumor.

Authors:  Masaaki Miyo; Ichiro Takemasa; Taishi Hata; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Yuichiro Doki; Masaki Mori
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Trajectory of change of low anterior resection syndrome over time after restorative proctectomy for rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  F Al-Rashid; S Robitaille; A S Liberman; P Charlebois; B Stein; L S Feldman; J F Fiore; L Lee
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  Conversations for providers caring for patients with rectal cancer: Comparison of long-term patient-centered outcomes for patients with low rectal cancer facing ostomy or sphincter-sparing surgery.

Authors:  Lisa J Herrinton; Andrea Altschuler; Carmit K McMullen; Joanna E Bulkley; Mark C Hornbrook; Virginia Sun; Christopher S Wendel; Marcia Grant; Carol M Baldwin; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Larissa K F Temple; Robert S Krouse
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Survival after Abdominoperineal and Sphincter-Preserving Resection in Nonmetastatic Rectal Cancer: A Population-Based Time-Trend and Propensity Score-Matched SEER Analysis.

Authors:  Rene Warschkow; Sabrina M Ebinger; Walter Brunner; Bruno M Schmied; Lukas Marti
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with unresectable locally advanced colon cancer: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Hui Chang; Xin Yu; Wei-Wei Xiao; Qiao-Xuan Wang; Wen-Hao Zhou; Zhi-Fan Zeng; Pei-Rong Ding; Li-Ren Li; Yuan-Hong Gao
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Defunctioning ileostomy and mechanical bowel preparation may contribute to development of low anterior resection syndrome.

Authors:  Michał M Nowakowski; Mateusz Rubinkiewicz; Natalia Gajewska; Grzegorz Torbicz; Michał Wysocki; Piotr Małczak; Piotr Major; Mateusz Wierdak; Andrzej Budzyński; Michał Pędziwiatr
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 1.195

10.  Clinical effectiveness of omental transposition in facilitating perineal wound healing after abdominoperineal resection: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sungjin Kim; Sung Il Kang; Sohyun Kim; Jae Hwang Kim
Journal:  Yeungnam Univ J Med       Date:  2021-02-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.