Literature DB >> 25256082

The influence of bilateral internal mammary arteries on short- and long-term outcomes: a propensity score matching in accordance with current recommendations.

Umberto Benedetto1, Mohamed Amrani2, Jullien Gaer2, Toufan Bahrami2, Fabio de Robertis2, André R Simon2, Shahzad G Raja2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We undertook a single-center, 12 years outcomes analysis of the influence of bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMA) over single internal mammary artery (SIMA) on short-term outcomes and long-term outcomes by means of propensity score matching technique in accordance to current recommendations.
METHODS: A propensity score was generated for each patient from a multivariable logistic regression model based on 20 pretreatment covariates. The study population consisted of 4195 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft procedure using SIMA (n = 3445; 78.3%) or BIMA (n = 750; 21.7%). A total of 750 matching sets were derived.
RESULTS: The BIMA group was associated with an increased rate of superficial sternal wound infection (5.6% vs 1.7%; P = .0001) but the incidence of deep sternal wound infection was comparable between the 2 groups, at 2.1% and 1.5% in BIMA and SIMA groups, respectively (P = .43). With regard to other postoperative complications the 2 groups were comparable. Operative mortality rate did not significantly differ between the 2 groups, at 0.7% and 1.2% in the BIMA and SIMA groups, respectively (P = .28). After a mean follow-up time of 4.8 ± 3.2 years, BIMA use was associated with a significantly lower risk for late mortality (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.97; P = .03) and need for repeat revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.96; P = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: When compared with SIMA grafting, BIMA use did not increase operative morbidity and mortality and was associated with a better long-term survival.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25256082     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  15 in total

Review 1.  Optimal use of arterial grafts during current coronary artery bypass surgery.

Authors:  Suzuki Tomoaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in octogenarians: where are the benefits?

Authors:  Giuseppe Gatti; Luca Dell'Angela; Bernardo Benussi; Lorella Dreas; Gabriella Forti; Marco Gabrielli; Elisabetta Rauber; Roberto Luzzati; Gianfranco Sinagra; Aniello Pappalardo
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Long-term Outcomes of Multiple Arterial Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Population-Based Study of Patients in British Columbia, Canada.

Authors:  Aihua Pu; Lillian Ding; Jungwon Shin; Joel Price; Peter Skarsgard; Daniel R Wong; John Bozinovski; Guy Fradet; James G Abel
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 14.676

4.  Right for the Wrong Reasons: Implications of Data Insufficiency in Bilateral Versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting Analysis.

Authors:  Christopher T Ryan; Alexander Schutz; Todd K Rosengart
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Unmeasured Confounders in Observational Studies Comparing Bilateral Versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Antonino Di Franco; Mohamed Rahouma; Derrick Y Tam; Mario Iannaccone; Saswata Deb; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Ahmed A Abouarab; Leonard N Girardi; David P Taggart; Stephen E Fremes
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 6.  Bilateral Versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts.

Authors:  Michael Persson; Ulrik Sartipy
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Radial Artery Versus Right Internal Thoracic Artery Versus Saphenous Vein as the Second Conduit for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Roberto Lorusso; Mohamed Rahouma; Ahmed Abouarab; Derrick Y Tam; Cristiano Spadaccio; Gaëlle Saint-Hilary; Jeremy Leonard; Mario Iannaccone; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Antonino Di Franco; Giovanni Soletti; Mohamed K Kamel; Christopher Lau; Leonard N Girardi; Thomas A Schwann; Umberto Benedetto; David P Taggart; Stephen E Fremes
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 8.  Minimally Invasive Coronary Revascularisation Surgery: A Focused Review of the Available Literature.

Authors:  Karel M Van Praet; Markus Kofler; Timo Z Nazari Shafti; Alaa Abd El Al; Antonia van Kampen; Andrea Amabile; Gianluca Torregrossa; Jörg Kempfert; Volkmar Falk; Husam H Balkhy; Stephan Jacobs
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-05-19

9.  Use Rate and Outcome in Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting: Insights From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Faisal Bakaeen; Umberto Benedetto; Mohamed Rahouma; Antonino Di Franco; Derrick Y Tam; Mario Iannaccone; Thomas A Schwann; Robert Habib; Marc Ruel; John D Puskas; Joseph Sabik; Leonard N Girardi; David P Taggart; Stephen E Fremes
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Grafting: Sternal Wound Infection in High-Risk Population. Should Sternal Infection Scare Us?

Authors:  Justine Mafalda Ravaux; Thami Guennaoui; Christian Mélot; Peter Schraverus
Journal:  Open J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-07-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.