BACKGROUND: Biologicals are important treatment options for various chronic diseases. After the introduction of the first biosimilars, animated debate arose in the scientific community about the actual benefit-risk profile of these drugs. In this context, a comparative safety evaluation of biologicals and biosimilars in clinical practice is warranted. METHODS: We identified all suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) concerning biological/biosimilars (excluding vaccines, toxins, blood derivatives, and radio-pharmaceuticals), and further classified them into mechanistic classes. We described the frequency of biological/biosimilar class- and compound-specific ADRs by system organ class (SOC) and type of reporter. We also separately explored the traceability of biologicals and biosimilar-related ADR reports. RESULTS: Overall 171,201 ADR reports were collected during the observation period; 9,601 (5.6 %) of these concerned biologicals. Biological-related reports were mainly issued by hospital-based physicians (78.7 %). Most of these reports involved monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins (66.3 %). Reported ADRs were mainly 'skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders' (21 %), 'general and administration site disorders' (17 %), and 'gastrointestinal disorders' (13.6 %). In terms of traceability, 94.8 % of biological-related reports included an identifiable product name, whilst only 8.6 % indicated the corresponding batch number. Regarding biosimilars, 298 reports were identified, with a low proportion indicating drug ineffectiveness (10.1 %). CONCLUSIONS: Most ADRs attributed to biologicals are 'skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders'. Anticancer monoclonal antibodies are most frequently associated with ADRs. A low proportion of ADR reports concern biosimilars.
BACKGROUND: Biologicals are important treatment options for various chronic diseases. After the introduction of the first biosimilars, animated debate arose in the scientific community about the actual benefit-risk profile of these drugs. In this context, a comparative safety evaluation of biologicals and biosimilars in clinical practice is warranted. METHODS: We identified all suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) concerning biological/biosimilars (excluding vaccines, toxins, blood derivatives, and radio-pharmaceuticals), and further classified them into mechanistic classes. We described the frequency of biological/biosimilar class- and compound-specific ADRs by system organ class (SOC) and type of reporter. We also separately explored the traceability of biologicals and biosimilar-related ADR reports. RESULTS: Overall 171,201 ADR reports were collected during the observation period; 9,601 (5.6 %) of these concerned biologicals. Biological-related reports were mainly issued by hospital-based physicians (78.7 %). Most of these reports involved monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins (66.3 %). Reported ADRs were mainly 'skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders' (21 %), 'general and administration site disorders' (17 %), and 'gastrointestinal disorders' (13.6 %). In terms of traceability, 94.8 % of biological-related reports included an identifiable product name, whilst only 8.6 % indicated the corresponding batch number. Regarding biosimilars, 298 reports were identified, with a low proportion indicating drug ineffectiveness (10.1 %). CONCLUSIONS: Most ADRs attributed to biologicals are 'skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders'. Anticancer monoclonal antibodies are most frequently associated with ADRs. A low proportion of ADR reports concern biosimilars.
Authors: Thijs J Giezen; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Sabine M J M Straus; Huub Schellekens; Hubert G M Leufkens; Antoine C G Egberts Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-10-22 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Niels S Vermeer; Sabine M J M Straus; Aukje K Mantel-Teeuwisse; Francois Domergue; Toine C G Egberts; Hubert G M Leufkens; Marie L De Bruin Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Thomas Dörner; Vibeke Strand; Paul Cornes; João Gonçalves; László Gulácsi; Jonathan Kay; Tore K Kvien; Josef Smolen; Yoshiya Tanaka; Gerd R Burmester Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2016-03-08 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Kevin Klein; Joep H G Scholl; Niels S Vermeer; André W Broekmans; Eugène P Van Puijenbroek; Marie L De Bruin; Pieter Stolk Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Maria Antonietta Barbieri; Giuseppe Cicala; Paola Maria Cutroneo; Elisabetta Gerratana; Caterina Palleria; Caterina De Sarro; Ada Vero; Luigi Iannone; Antonia Manti; Emilio Russo; Giovambattista De Sarro; Fabiola Atzeni; Edoardo Spina Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 4.241