Literature DB >> 25255469

Modelling ligand selectivity of serine proteases using integrative proteochemometric approaches improves model performance and allows the multi-target dependent interpretation of features.

Qurrat U Ain1, Oscar Méndez-Lucio, Isidro Cortés Ciriano, Thérèse Malliavin, Gerard J P van Westen, Andreas Bender.   

Abstract

Serine proteases, implicated in important physiological functions, have a high intra-family similarity, which leads to unwanted off-target effects of inhibitors with insufficient selectivity. However, the availability of sequence and structure data has now made it possible to develop approaches to design pharmacological agents that can discriminate successfully between their related binding sites. In this study, we have quantified the relationship between 12,625 distinct protease inhibitors and their bioactivity against 67 targets of the serine protease family (20,213 data points) in an integrative manner, using proteochemometric modelling (PCM). The benchmarking of 21 different target descriptors motivated the usage of specific binding pocket amino acid descriptors, which helped in the identification of active site residues and selective compound chemotypes affecting compound affinity and selectivity. PCM models performed better than alternative approaches (models trained using exclusively compound descriptors on all available data, QSAR) employed for comparison with R(2)/RMSE values of 0.64 ± 0.23/0.66 ± 0.20 vs. 0.35 ± 0.27/1.05 ± 0.27 log units, respectively. Moreover, the interpretation of the PCM model singled out various chemical substructures responsible for bioactivity and selectivity towards particular proteases (thrombin, trypsin and coagulation factor 10) in agreement with the literature. For instance, absence of a tertiary sulphonamide was identified to be responsible for decreased selective activity (by on average 0.27 ± 0.65 pChEMBL units) on FA10. Among the binding pocket residues, the amino acids (arginine, leucine and tyrosine) at positions 35, 39, 60, 93, 140 and 207 were observed as key contributing residues for selective affinity on these three targets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25255469     DOI: 10.1039/c4ib00175c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)        ISSN: 1757-9694            Impact factor:   2.192


  8 in total

1.  3D proteochemometrics: using three-dimensional information of proteins and ligands to address aspects of the selectivity of serine proteases.

Authors:  Vigneshwari Subramanian; Qurrat Ul Ain; Helena Henno; Lars-Olof Pietilä; Julian E Fuchs; Peteris Prusis; Andreas Bender; Gerd Wohlfahrt
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.597

Review 2.  In Silico Studies in Drug Research Against Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Authors:  Farahnaz Rezaei Makhouri; Jahan B Ghasemi
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 7.363

Review 3.  Current computational methods for predicting protein interactions of natural products.

Authors:  Aurélien F A Moumbock; Jianyu Li; Pankaj Mishra; Mingjie Gao; Stefan Günther
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 7.271

4.  Prediction of Protein-ligand Interaction Based on Sequence Similarity and Ligand Structural Features.

Authors:  Dmitry Karasev; Boris Sobolev; Alexey Lagunin; Dmitry Filimonov; Vladimir Poroikov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Recent applications of deep learning and machine intelligence on in silico drug discovery: methods, tools and databases.

Authors:  Ahmet Sureyya Rifaioglu; Heval Atas; Maria Jesus Martin; Rengul Cetin-Atalay; Volkan Atalay; Tunca Doğan
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  Bioalerts: a python library for the derivation of structural alerts from bioactivity and toxicity data sets.

Authors:  Isidro Cortes-Ciriano
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 5.514

Review 7.  Drug Design for CNS Diseases: Polypharmacological Profiling of Compounds Using Cheminformatic, 3D-QSAR and Virtual Screening Methodologies.

Authors:  Katarina Nikolic; Lazaros Mavridis; Teodora Djikic; Jelica Vucicevic; Danica Agbaba; Kemal Yelekci; John B O Mitchell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Prediction of Protein-Ligand Interaction Based on the Positional Similarity Scores Derived from Amino Acid Sequences.

Authors:  Dmitry Karasev; Boris Sobolev; Alexey Lagunin; Dmitry Filimonov; Vladimir Poroikov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.