Literature DB >> 25254666

Updated preparedness and response framework for influenza pandemics.

Rachel Holloway, Sonja A Rasmussen, Stephanie Zaza, Nancy J Cox, Daniel B Jernigan.   

Abstract

The complexities of planning for and responding to the emergence of novel influenza viruses emphasize the need for systematic frameworks to describe the progression of the event; weigh the risk of emergence and potential public health impact; evaluate transmissibility, antiviral resistance, and severity; and make decisions about interventions. On the basis of experience from recent influenza responses, CDC has updated its framework to describe influenza pandemic progression using six intervals (two prepandemic and four pandemic intervals) and eight domains. This updated framework can be used for influenza pandemic planning and serves as recommendations for risk assessment, decision-making, and action in the United States. The updated framework replaces the U.S. federal government stages from the 2006 implementation plan for the National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza (US Homeland Security Council. National strategy for pandemic influenza: implementation plan. Washington, DC: US Homeland Security Council; 2006. Available at http://www.flu.gov/planning-preparedness/federal/pandemic-influenza-implementation.pdf). The six intervals of the updated framework are as follows: 1) investigation of cases of novel influenza, 2) recognition of increased potential for ongoing transmission, 3) initiation of a pandemic wave, 4) acceleration of a pandemic wave, 5) deceleration of a pandemic wave, and 6) preparation for future pandemic waves. The following eight domains are used to organize response efforts within each interval: incident management, surveillance and epidemiology, laboratory, community mitigation, medical care and countermeasures, vaccine, risk communications, and state/local coordination. Compared with the previous U.S. government stages, this updated framework provides greater detail and clarity regarding the potential timing of key decisions and actions aimed at slowing the spread and mitigating the impact of an emerging pandemic. Use of this updated framework is anticipated to improve pandemic preparedness and response in the United States. Activities and decisions during a response are event-specific. These intervals serve as a reference for public health decision-making by federal, state, and local health authorities in the United States during an influenza pandemic and are not meant to be prescriptive or comprehensive. This framework incorporates information from newly developed tools for pandemic planning and response, including the Influenza Risk Assessment Tool and the Pandemic Severity Assessment Framework, and has been aligned with the pandemic phases restructured in 2013 by the World Health Organization.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25254666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep        ISSN: 1057-5987


  41 in total

1.  Community Mitigation Guidelines to Prevent Pandemic Influenza - United States, 2017.

Authors:  Noreen Qualls; Alexandra Levitt; Neha Kanade; Narue Wright-Jegede; Stephanie Dopson; Matthew Biggerstaff; Carrie Reed; Amra Uzicanin
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2017-04-21

2.  Redesigning Primary Care to Address the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Midst of the Pandemic.

Authors:  Alex H Krist; Jennifer E DeVoe; Anthony Cheng; Thomas Ehrlich; Samuel M Jones
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Readiness to Vaccinate Critical Personnel During an Influenza Pandemic, United States, 2015.

Authors:  Danielle L Moulia; Stephanie A Dopson; Sara J Vagi; Thomas J Fitzgerald; Amy Parker Fiebelkorn; Samuel B Graitcer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Elective Procedures in Obstetrics and Gynecology During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Patrick S Ramsey; Sarah M Page-Ramsey
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 0.218

5.  Integrating pharmacies into public health program planning for pandemic influenza vaccine response.

Authors:  Thomas J Fitzgerald; Yoonjae Kang; Carolyn B Bridges; Todd Talbert; Sara J Vagi; Brock Lamont; Samuel B Graitcer
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Restarting gastrointestinal endoscopy in the deceleration and early recovery phases of COVID-19 pandemic: Guidance from the British Society of Gastroenterology.

Authors:  Colin J Rees; James E East; Kofi Oppong; Andrew Veitch; Mark McAlindon; John Anderson; Bu Hayee; Cathryn Edwards; Alastair McKinlay; Ian Penman
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.659

7.  Refining the approach to vaccines against influenza A viruses with pandemic potential.

Authors:  Rita Czako; Kanta Subbarao
Journal:  Future Virol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.831

8.  Leveraging Informatics and Technology to Support Public Health Response: Framework and Illustrations using COVID-19.

Authors:  Jane L Snowdon; William Kassler; Hema Karunakaram; Brian E Dixon; Kyu Rhee
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2021-03-21

9.  A predictive score for progression of COVID-19 in hospitalized persons: a cohort study.

Authors:  Jingbo Xu; Weida Wang; Honghui Ye; Wenzheng Pang; Pengfei Pang; Meiwen Tang; Feng Xie; Zhitao Li; Bixiang Li; Anqi Liang; Juan Zhuang; Jing Yang; Chunyu Zhang; Jiangnan Ren; Lin Tian; Zhonghe Li; Jinyu Xia; Robert P Gale; Hong Shan; Yang Liang
Journal:  NPJ Prim Care Respir Med       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.871

10.  Understanding small Chinese cities as COVID-19 hotspots with an urban epidemic hazard index.

Authors:  Tianyi Li; Jiawen Luo; Cunrui Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.