Literature DB >> 25254387

Perthes Disease: The Quality and Reliability of Information on the Internet.

Mujtaba Nassiri1, Robert A Bruce-Brand, Francis O'Neill, Shojaeddin Chenouri, Paul Curtin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research has shown that up to 89% of parents used the Internet to seek health information regarding their child's medical condition. Much of the information on the Internet is valuable; however, the quality of health information is variable and unregulated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality and content of information about Perthes disease on the Internet using recognized scoring systems, identification of quality markers, and describe a novel specific score.
METHODS: We searched the top 3 search engines (Google, Yahoo!, and Bing) for the following keywords: "Perthes disease." Forty-five unique Web sites were identified. The Web sites were then categorized by type and assessed using the DISCERN score, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and a novel Perthes-specific Content score. The presence of the Health On the Net (HON) code, a reported quality assurance marker, was noted.
RESULTS: Of the Web sites analyzed, the Majority were Governmental and Nonprofit Organizations (NPO) (37.8%), followed by commercial Web sites (22.2%). Only 6 of the Web sites were HONcode certified. The mean DISCERN score was 53.1 (SD=9.0). The Governmental and NPO Web sites had the highest overall DISCERN scores followed closely by Physician Web sites. The mean JAMA benchmark criteria score was 2.1 (SD=1.2). Nine Web sites had maximal scores and the Academic Web sites had the highest overall JAMA benchmark scores. DISCERN scores, JAMA benchmark scores, and Perthes-specific Content scores were all greater for Web sites that bore the HONcode seal.
CONCLUSIONS: The quality of information available online regarding Perthes disease is of variable quality. Governmental and NPO Web sites predominate and also provide higher quality content. The HONcode seal is a reliable indicator of Web site quality. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Physicians should recommend the HONcode seal to their patients as a reliable indicator of Web site quality or, better yet, refer patients to sites they have personally reviewed. Supplying parents with a guide to health information on the Internet will help exclude Web sites as sources of misinformation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25254387     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000312

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  5 in total

1.  Social Media in Pediatric Orthopaedics.

Authors:  Sarah T Lander; James O Sanders; Peter C Cook; Natasha T O'Malley
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2017 Oct/Nov       Impact factor: 2.324

2.  Comparison of the accuracy of CBCT effective radiation dose information in peer-reviewed journals and dental media.

Authors:  Diana Hicks; Michael Melkers; Julie Barna; Kimberley R Isett; Gregg H Gilbert
Journal:  Gen Dent       Date:  2019 May-Jun

Review 3.  The Value of Web-Based Patient Education Materials on Transarterial Chemoembolization: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Georgios Antonios Sideris; Aikaterini-Themis Vyllioti; Danai Dima; Michael Chill; Njogu Njuguna
Journal:  JMIR Cancer       Date:  2021-05-07

4.  The Quality of Online Information for an Uncommon Malignancy-Neuroendocrine Tumours (NETs).

Authors:  Safa Sohail; Victoria Zuk; Thorvardur Halfdanarson; Dadvid Chan; Sharon Pattison; Ravleen Vasdev; Calvin Law; Julie Hallet
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  An Evaluation of the Source and Content of Dupuytren's Disease Information Available on the Internet.

Authors:  Kyle Plusch; Jack Carfagno; Daniel Givner; Daniel Fletcher; Daren Aita; Greg G Gallant; Jack Abboudi; Pedro Beredjiklian
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.