Literature DB >> 25253960

Parameters of a severe disease course in ulcerative colitis.

Andreas Stallmach1, Luisa Nickel1, Thomas Lehmann1, Bernd Bokemeyer1, Martin Bürger1, Dietrich Hüppe1, Wolfgang Kruis1, Susanna Nikolaus1, Jan C Preiss1, Andreas Sturm1, Niels Teich1, Carsten Schmidt1.   

Abstract

AIM: To detect high risk patients with a progressive disease course of ulcerative colitis (UC) requiring immunosuppressive therapy (IT).
METHODS: A retrospective, multicenter analysis of 262 UC patients from eight German tertiary inflammatory bowel disease centres was performed. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the patients need to initiate immunosuppressive therapy in the disease course. A comparison between the two groups was made with regard to demographics, clinical and laboratory parameters obtained within three months after UC diagnosis and the response to first medical therapy. Using this data, a prognostic model was established to predict the individual patients probability of requiring an immunosuppressive therapy.
RESULTS: In 104 (39.7%) out of 262 patients, UC therapy required an immunosuppressive treatment. Patients in this group were significantly younger at time of diagnosis (HR = 0.981 ± 0.014 per year, P = 0.009), and required significantly more often a hospitalisation (HR = 2.5 ± 1.0, P < 0.001) and a systemic corticosteroid therapy at disease onset (HR = 2.4 ± 0.8, P < 0.001), respectively. Response to steroid treatment was significantly different between the two groups of patients (HR = 5.2 ± 3.9 to 50.8 ± 35.6 compared to no steroids, P = 0.016 to P < 0.001). Furthermore, in the IT group an extended disease (HR = 3.5 ± 2.4 to 6.1 ± 4.0 compared to proctitis, P = 0.007 to P = 0.001), anemia (HR = 2.2 ± 0.8, P < 0.001), thrombocytosis (HR = 1.9 ± 1.8, P = 0.009), elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) (HR = 2.1 ± 0.9, P < 0.001), and extraintestinal manifestations in the course of disease (HR = 2.6 ± 1.1, P = 0.004) were observed. Six simple clinical items were used to establish a prognostic model to predict the individual risk requiring an IT. This probability ranges from less than 2% up to 100% after 5 years. Using this, the necessity of an immunosuppressive therapy can be predicted in 60% of patients. Our model can determine the need for an immunosuppressive drug therapy or if a "watch and wait" approach is reasonable already early in the treatment course of UC.
CONCLUSION: Using six simple clinical parameters, we can estimate the patients individual risk of developing a progressive disease course.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical practice; Inflammatory bowel disease; Parameter; Prediction model; Ulcerative colitis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25253960      PMCID: PMC4168093          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i35.12574

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  20 in total

1.  Predictors of aggressive inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Andres J Yarur; Sebastian G Strobel; Amar R Deshpande; Maria T Abreu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2011-10

Review 2.  Clinical predictors of aggressive/disabling disease: ulcerative colitis and crohn disease.

Authors:  Wojciech Blonski; Anna M Buchner; Gary R Lichtenstein
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 3.  Role of endoscopy in predicting the disease course in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Matthieu Allez; Marc Lémann
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: Current management.

Authors:  A Dignass; G Van Assche; J O Lindsay; M Lémann; J Söderholm; J F Colombel; S Danese; A D'Hoore; M Gassull; F Gomollón; D W Hommes; P Michetti; C O'Morain; T Oresland; A Windsor; E F Stange; S P L Travis
Journal:  J Crohns Colitis       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 9.071

5.  Risk factors and characteristics of extent progression in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  María Josefina Etchevers; Montserrat Aceituno; Orlando García-Bosch; Ingrid Ordás; Miquel Sans; Elena Ricart; Julián Panés
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.325

6.  [Updated German guideline on diagnosis and treatment of ulcerative colitis, 2011].

Authors:  A Dignass; J C Preiss; D E Aust; F Autschbach; A Ballauff; G Barretton; B Bokemeyer; S Fichtner-Feigl; S Hagel; K R Herrlinger; G Jantschek; A Kroesen; W Kruis; T Kucharzik; J Langhorst; M Reinshagen; G Rogler; D Schleiermacher; C Schmidt; S Schreiber; H Schulze; E Stange; M Zeitz; J C Hoffmann; A Stallmach
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Course of ulcerative colitis: analysis of changes in disease activity over years.

Authors:  E Langholz; P Munkholm; M Davidsen; V Binder
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  Adverse effects of biologics used for treating IBD.

Authors:  Andreas Stallmach; Stefan Hagel; Tony Bruns
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.043

9.  Epidemiology and natural history of inflammatory bowel diseases.

Authors:  Jacques Cosnes; Corinne Gower-Rousseau; Philippe Seksik; Antoine Cortot
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Colonoscopy of acute colitis. A safe and reliable tool for assessment of severity.

Authors:  F Carbonnel; A Lavergne; M Lémann; A Bitoun; P Valleur; P Hautefeuille; A Galian; R Modigliani; J C Rambaud
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 3.199

View more
  5 in total

1.  Genetic Predictors of Benign Course of Ulcerative Colitis-A North American Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics Consortium Study.

Authors:  Uri Kopylov; Gabrielle Boucher; Matti Waterman; Claudia R Rivers; Mohini Patel; Judy H Cho; Jean F Colombel; Richard H Duerr; David Binion; Dermot P B McGovern; Phillip P Schumm; Steven R Brant; Mark S Silverberg; John D Rioux; Alain Bitton
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.325

2.  Predicting the Individual Risk of Acute Severe Colitis at Diagnosis.

Authors:  Monica Cesarini; Gary S Collins; Anders Rönnblom; Antonieta Santos; Lai Mun Wang; Daniel Sjöberg; Miles Parkes; Satish Keshav; Simon P L Travis
Journal:  J Crohns Colitis       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 9.071

3.  Bone mineral density and inflammatory bowel disease severity.

Authors:  C A Lima; A C Lyra; C M C Mendes; M B Lopes; F G Coqueiro; R Rocha; G O Santana
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 2.590

4.  How disease extent can be included in the endoscopic activity index of ulcerative colitis: the panMayo score, a promising scoring system.

Authors:  Anita Bálint; Klaudia Farkas; Zoltán Szepes; Ferenc Nagy; Mónika Szűcs; László Tiszlavicz; Renáta Bor; Ágnes Milassin; Mariann Rutka; Anna Fábián; Tamás Molnár
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Composite outcomes in observational studies of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fernando Magro; Catarina Alves; Mafalda Santiago; Paula Ministro; Paula Lago; Luís Correia; Raquel Gonçalves; Diana Carvalho; Francisco Portela; Cláudia Camila Dias; Axel Dignass; Silvio Danese; Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet; Maria Manuela Estevinho; Paula Moreira
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.