V Schure1, M Voigt2, R L Schild1, V Hesse2, M Carstensen3, K T M Schneider4, S Straube5. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Diakonische Dienste Hannover, Hannover. 2. German Center for Growth, Development, and Health Encouragement during Childhood and Youth, Berlin. 3. Jerusalem Hospital, Hamburg. 4. Section of Perinatal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Technical University of Munich, Munich. 5. Department of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen.
Abstract
Aim: "Late motherhood" is associated with greater perinatal risks but the term lacks precise definition. We present an approach to determine what "late motherhood" associated with "high risk" is, based on parity and preterm birth rate. Materials and Methods: Using data from the German Perinatal Survey of 1998-2000 we analysed preterm birth rates in women with zero, one, or two previous live births. We compared groups of "late" mothers (with high preterm birth rates) with "control" groups of younger women (with relatively low preterm birth rates). Data of 208 342 women were analysed. For women with zero (one; two) previous live births, the "control" group included women aged 22-26 (27-31; 29-33) years. Women in the "late motherhood" group were aged > 33 (> 35; > 38) years. Results: The "late motherhood" groups defined in this way were also at higher risk of adverse perinatal events other than preterm birth. For women with zero (one; two) previous live births, normal cephalic presentation occurred in 89 % (92.7 %; 93.3 %) in the "control" group, but only in 84.5 % (90 %; 90.4 %) in the "late motherhood" group. The mode of delivery was spontaneous or at most requiring manual help in 71.3 % (83.4 %; 85.8 %) in the "control" group, but only in 51.4 % (72.2 %; 76.4 %) in the "late motherhood" group. Five-minute APGAR scores were likewise worse for neonates of "late" mothers and the proportion with a birth weight ≤ 2499 g was greater. Conclusion: "Late motherhood" that is associated with greater perinatal risks can be defined based on parity and preterm birth rate.
Aim: "Late motherhood" is associated with greater perinatal risks but the term lacks precise definition. We present an approach to determine what "late motherhood" associated with "high risk" is, based on parity and preterm birth rate. Materials and Methods: Using data from the German Perinatal Survey of 1998-2000 we analysed preterm birth rates in women with zero, one, or two previous live births. We compared groups of "late" mothers (with high preterm birth rates) with "control" groups of younger women (with relatively low preterm birth rates). Data of 208 342 women were analysed. For women with zero (one; two) previous live births, the "control" group included women aged 22-26 (27-31; 29-33) years. Women in the "late motherhood" group were aged > 33 (> 35; > 38) years. Results: The "late motherhood" groups defined in this way were also at higher risk of adverse perinatal events other than preterm birth. For women with zero (one; two) previous live births, normal cephalic presentation occurred in 89 % (92.7 %; 93.3 %) in the "control" group, but only in 84.5 % (90 %; 90.4 %) in the "late motherhood" group. The mode of delivery was spontaneous or at most requiring manual help in 71.3 % (83.4 %; 85.8 %) in the "control" group, but only in 51.4 % (72.2 %; 76.4 %) in the "late motherhood" group. Five-minute APGAR scores were likewise worse for neonates of "late" mothers and the proportion with a birth weight ≤ 2499 g was greater. Conclusion: "Late motherhood" that is associated with greater perinatal risks can be defined based on parity and preterm birth rate.
Entities:
Keywords:
German Perinatal Survey; late motherhood; parity; perinatal risks; preterm birth rate
Authors: N Prapas; I Kalogiannidis; I Prapas; P Xiromeritis; A Karagiannidis; G Makedos Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2005-11-11 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: M Voigt; V Briese; V Pietzner; S Kirchengast; K T M Schneider; S Straube; G Jorch Journal: Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol Date: 2009-08-14 Impact factor: 0.685
Authors: Richard J Paulson; Robert Boostanfar; Peyman Saadat; Eliran Mor; David E Tourgeman; Cristin C Slater; Mary M Francis; John K Jain Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-11-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Patrick F McArdle; Toni I Pollin; Jeffrey R O'Connell; John D Sorkin; Richa Agarwala; Alejandro A Schäffer; Elizabeth A Streeten; Terri M King; Alan R Shuldiner; Braxton D Mitchell Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: R Scholz; M Voigt; K T M Schneider; N Rochow; H-P Hagenah; V Hesse; S Straube Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: A Weichert; T M Weichert; R L Bergmann; W Henrich; K D Kalache; R Richter; J Neymeyer; K E Bergmann Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 2.915