Literature DB >> 25253861

Retrospectively and prospectively modulated hippocampal place responses are differentially distributed along a common path in a continuous T-maze.

Julien Catanese1, Alessandro Viggiano2, Erika Cerasti2, Michaël B Zugaro2, Sidney I Wiener1.   

Abstract

Hippocampal place responses can be prospectively or retrospectively modulated by the animal's future or prior trajectory. Two main hypotheses explain this. The "multiple-map hypothesis" switches between different maps for different trajectories (rate remapping). In contrast, in the "buffer hypothesis," the hippocampus encodes an ongoing representation that includes the recent past and/or the impending future choice. This study examines the distribution of prospective and retrospective responses distributed along a common path in a continuous T-maze (providing all four combinations of provenance and destination) during a visual discrimination task. The multiple-map hypothesis predicts either uniform distributions or concerted shifts about a task-decision relevant point, whereas the buffer hypothesis predicts a time-limited overexpression around choice points (with retrospective responses after the central arm entry point and prospective responses nearer its exit). Here bilateral recordings in the dorsal CA1 region of the rat hippocampus show that retrospective responses were twice as prevalent as prospective responses. Furthermore, retrospective and prospective modulations have distinct spatial distributions, with retrospective primarily in the first two-thirds of the central arm and prospective restricted to the last third. To test for possible trial-by-trial remapping in relation to the two-thirds transition point, data from the first and second halves of the sessions were compared. Backward drift of path-modulated activity was significant only for retrospective, but not prospective, fields. Thus, these data are more consistent with the buffer hypothesis. Retrospective and prospective modulation would then participate in a single hippocampal representation of spatial and behavioral context.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/3413163-07$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  extracellular recording; hippocampus; navigation; place cell; prospective; retrospective

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25253861      PMCID: PMC4172807          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0819-14.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  34 in total

1.  Prospective and retrospective memory coding in the hippocampus.

Authors:  Janina Ferbinteanu; Matthew L Shapiro
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Prefrontal cortex and working memory processes.

Authors:  S Funahashi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Independent codes for spatial and episodic memory in hippocampal neuronal ensembles.

Authors:  Stefan Leutgeb; Jill K Leutgeb; Carol A Barnes; Edvard I Moser; Bruce L McNaughton; May-Britt Moser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Spatial, behavioral and sensory correlates of hippocampal CA1 complex spike cell activity: implications for information processing functions.

Authors:  S I Wiener
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  Spatial view cells in the primate hippocampus.

Authors:  E T Rolls; R G Robertson; P Georges-François
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely-moving rat.

Authors:  J O'Keefe; J Dostrovsky
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Sustained neural activity patterns during working memory in the human medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Nikolai Axmacher; Florian Mormann; Guillén Fernández; Michael X Cohen; Christian E Elger; Juergen Fell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Elements of a neurobiological theory of hippocampal function: the role of synaptic plasticity, synaptic tagging and schemas.

Authors:  R G M Morris
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 9.  Deciphering the hippocampal polyglot: the hippocampus as a path integration system.

Authors:  B L McNaughton; C A Barnes; J L Gerrard; K Gothard; M W Jung; J J Knierim; H Kudrimoti; Y Qin; W E Skaggs; M Suster; K L Weaver
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Hippocampal CA1 place cells encode intended destination on a maze with multiple choice points.

Authors:  James A Ainge; Minija Tamosiunaite; Florentin Woergoetter; Paul A Dudchenko
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Major diencephalic inputs to the hippocampus: supramammillary nucleus and nucleus reuniens. Circuitry and function.

Authors:  Robert P Vertes
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.453

2.  Hippocampus and subregions of the dorsal striatum respond differently to a behavioral strategy change on a spatial navigation task.

Authors:  Paul S Regier; Seiichiro Amemiya; A David Redish
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  A prefrontal-thalamo-hippocampal circuit for goal-directed spatial navigation.

Authors:  Hiroshi T Ito; Sheng-Jia Zhang; Menno P Witter; Edvard I Moser; May-Britt Moser
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Memory integration constructs maps of space, time, and concepts.

Authors:  Neal W Morton; Katherine R Sherrill; Alison R Preston
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2017-10

Review 5.  The rodent medial prefrontal cortex and associated circuits in orchestrating adaptive behavior under variable demands.

Authors:  John G Howland; Rutsuko Ito; Christopher C Lapish; Franz R Villaruel
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 9.052

6.  Spatial Representation of Hippocampal Place Cells in a T-Maze with an Aversive Stimulation.

Authors:  Sakura Okada; Hideyoshi Igata; Takuya Sasaki; Yuji Ikegaya
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.492

7.  Temporal Dynamics of Hippocampal and Medial Prefrontal Cortex Interactions During the Delay Period of a Working Memory-Guided Foraging Task.

Authors:  Maxym Myroshnychenko; Jeremy K Seamans; Anthony G Phillips; Christopher C Lapish
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Neural Representation of Overlapping Path Segments and Reward Acquisitions in the Monkey Hippocampus.

Authors:  Rafael Vieira Bretas; Jumpei Matsumoto; Hiroshi Nishimaru; Yusaku Takamura; Etsuro Hori; Taketoshi Ono; Hisao Nishijo
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-12

9.  Uncovering spatial representations from spatiotemporal patterns of rodent hippocampal field potentials.

Authors:  Liang Cao; Viktor Varga; Zhe S Chen
Journal:  Cell Rep Methods       Date:  2021-10-25

10.  Place cells on a maze encode routes rather than destinations.

Authors:  Roddy M Grieves; Emma R Wood; Paul A Dudchenko
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 8.140

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.