Literature DB >> 25253693

Gli1 protein regulates the S-phase checkpoint in tumor cells via Bid protein, and its inhibition sensitizes to DNA topoisomerase 1 inhibitors.

Kaushlendra Tripathi1, Chinnadurai Mani1, Reagan Barnett1, Sriram Nalluri1, Lavanya Bachaboina1, Rodney P Rocconi1, Mohammed Athar2, Laurie B Owen1, Komaraiah Palle3.   

Abstract

Aberrant expression of hedgehog molecules, particularly Gli1, is common in cancers of many tissues and is responsible for their aggressive behavior and chemoresistance. Here we demonstrate a novel and tumor-specific role for aberrant Gli1 in the regulation of the S-phase checkpoint that suppresses replication stress and resistance to chemotherapy. Inhibition of Gli1 in tumor cells induced replication stress-mediated DNA damage response, attenuated their clonogenic potential, abrogated camptothecin (CPT)-induced Chk1 phosphorylation, and potentiated its cytotoxicity. However, in normal fibroblasts, Gli1 siRNAs showed no significant changes in CPT-induced Chk1 phosphorylation. Further analysis of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related protein (ATR)/Chk1 signaling cascade genes in tumor cells revealed an unexpected mechanism whereby Gli1 regulates ATR-mediated Chk1 phosphorylation by transcriptional regulation of the BH3-only protein Bid. Consistent with its role in DNA damage response, Bid down-regulation in tumor cells abolished CPT-induced Chk1 phosphorylation and sensitized them to CPT. Correspondingly, Gli1 inhibition affected the expression of Bid and the association of replication protein A (RPA) with the ATR- interacting protein (ATRIP)-ATR complex, and this compromised the S-phase checkpoint. Conversely, complementation of Bid in Gli1-deficient cells restored CPT-induced Chk1 phosphorylation. An in silico analysis of the Bid promoter identified a putative Gli1 binding site, and further studies using luciferase reporter assays confirmed Gli1-dependent promoter activity. Collectively, our studies established a novel connection between aberrant Gli1 and Bid in the survival of tumor cells and their response to chemotherapy, at least in part, by regulating the S-phase checkpoint. Importantly, our data suggest a novel drug combination of Gli1 and Top1 inhibitors as an effective therapeutic strategy in treating tumors that expresses Gli1.
© 2014 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer Biology; Cell Cycle; Checkpoint Control; Chemoresistance; DNA Damage; DNA Damage Response; DNA Repair; DNA Replication; DNA Topoisomerase; Hedgehog Signaling Pathway

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25253693      PMCID: PMC4223349          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.606483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  75 in total

1.  Bid plays a role in the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Sandra S Zinkel; Kristen E Hurov; Atan Gross
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  33P: a superior radiotracer for phosphorus?

Authors:  J R Robinson
Journal:  Int J Appl Radiat Isot       Date:  1969-07

3.  DNA topoisomerase I drugs and radiotherapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Allan Y Chen; Patricia M T Chen; Yi-Jen Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  BID preferentially activates BAK while BIM preferentially activates BAX, affecting chemotherapy response.

Authors:  Kristopher A Sarosiek; Xiaoke Chi; John A Bachman; Joshua J Sims; Joan Montero; Luv Patel; Annabelle Flanagan; David W Andrews; Peter Sorger; Anthony Letai
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  Inhibition of GLI-mediated transcription and tumor cell growth by small-molecule antagonists.

Authors:  Matthias Lauth; Asa Bergström; Takashi Shimokawa; Rune Toftgård
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Essential function of Chk1 can be uncoupled from DNA damage checkpoint and replication control.

Authors:  Deborah Wilsker; Eva Petermann; Thomas Helleday; Fred Bunz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Communicating with Hedgehogs.

Authors:  Joan E Hooper; Matthew P Scott
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 8.  GLI transcription factors: mediators of oncogenic Hedgehog signalling.

Authors:  Maria Kasper; Gerhard Regl; Anna-Maria Frischauf; Fritz Aberger
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 9.162

9.  Mus81-mediated DNA cleavage resolves replication forks stalled by topoisomerase I-DNA complexes.

Authors:  Marie Regairaz; Yong-Wei Zhang; Haiqing Fu; Keli K Agama; Nalini Tata; Surbhi Agrawal; Mirit I Aladjem; Yves Pommier
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 10.539

10.  ALDH1A1 maintains ovarian cancer stem cell-like properties by altered regulation of cell cycle checkpoint and DNA repair network signaling.

Authors:  Erhong Meng; Aparna Mitra; Kaushlendra Tripathi; Michael A Finan; Jennifer Scalici; Steve McClellan; Luciana Madeira da Silva; Eddie Reed; Lalita A Shevde; Komaraiah Palle; Rodney P Rocconi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Ionizing Radiation Exposure and Basal Cell Carcinoma Pathogenesis.

Authors:  Changzhao Li; Mohammad Athar
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Rad6 upregulation promotes stem cell-like characteristics and platinum resistance in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ranganatha R Somasagara; Kaushlendra Tripathi; Sebastian M Spencer; David W Clark; Reagan Barnett; Lavanya Bachaboina; Jennifer Scalici; Rodney P Rocconi; Gary A Piazza; Komaraiah Palle
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Allyl isothiocyanate induces replication-associated DNA damage response in NSCLC cells and sensitizes to ionizing radiation.

Authors:  Kaushlendra Tripathi; Usama K Hussein; Roja Anupalli; Reagan Barnett; Lavanya Bachaboina; Jennifer Scalici; Rodney P Rocconi; Laurie B Owen; Gary A Piazza; Komaraiah Palle
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-03-10

Review 4.  The Impact of Hedgehog Signaling Pathway on DNA Repair Mechanisms in Human Cancer.

Authors:  Erhong Meng; Ann Hanna; Rajeev S Samant; Lalita A Shevde
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  GLI inhibitor GANT-61 diminishes embryonal and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma growth by inhibiting Shh/AKT-mTOR axis.

Authors:  Ritesh K Srivastava; Samer Zaid Kaylani; Nayf Edrees; Changzhao Li; Sarang S Talwelkar; Jianmin Xu; Komaraiah Palle; Joseph G Pressey; Mohammad Athar
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2014-12-15

6.  Rad18 is required for functional interactions between FANCD2, BRCA2, and Rad51 to repair DNA topoisomerase 1-poisons induced lesions and promote fork recovery.

Authors:  Kaushlendra Tripathi; Chinnadurai Mani; David W Clark; Komaraiah Palle
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-15

Review 7.  Hedgehog signaling: modulation of cancer properies and tumor mircroenvironment.

Authors:  Ann Hanna; Lalita A Shevde
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 27.401

Review 8.  Aberrant GLI1 Activation in DNA Damage Response, Carcinogenesis and Chemoresistance.

Authors:  Komaraiah Palle; Chinnadurai Mani; Kaushlendra Tripathi; Mohammad Athar
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Development of mediastinal lymphoma after radiotherapy for concurrent medulloblastoma and PNET in a patient with Gorlin syndrome.

Authors:  Tao Jiang; Junmei Wang; Ying Wang; Chunde Li
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  FANCJ protein is important for the stability of FANCD2/FANCI proteins and protects them from proteasome and caspase-3 dependent degradation.

Authors:  David W Clark; Kaushlendra Tripathi; Josephine C Dorsman; Komaraiah Palle
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-10-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.