Literature DB >> 25253477

Gaze locations affect explicit process but not implicit process during visuomotor adaptation.

Miya K Rand1, Sebastian Rentsch2.   

Abstract

The role of vision in implicit and explicit processes involved in adaptation to novel visuomotor transformations is not well-understood. We manipulated subjects' gaze locations through instructions during a visuomotor rotation task that established a conflict between implicit and explicit processes. Subjects were informed of a rotated visual feedback (45° counterclockwise from the desired target) and instructed to counteract it by using an explicit aiming strategy to the neighboring target (45° clockwise from the target). Simultaneously, they were instructed to gaze at either the desired target (target-gaze group), the neighboring target (hand-target-gaze group), or anywhere (free-gaze group) during aiming. After initial elimination of behavioral errors caused by strategic aiming, the subjects gradually overcompensated the rotation in the early practice, thereby increasing behavioral errors (i.e., a drift). This was caused by an implicit adaptation overriding the explicit strategy. Notably, prescribed gaze locations did not affect this implicit adaptation. In the late practice, the target-gaze and free-gaze groups reduced the drift, whereas the hand-target-gaze group did not. Furthermore, the free-gaze group changed gaze locations for strategic aiming through practice from the neighboring target to the desired target. The onset of this change was correlated with the onset of the drift reduction. These results suggest that gaze locations critically affect explicit adjustments of aiming directions to reduce the drift by taking into account the implicit adaptation that is occurring in parallel. Taken together, spatial eye-hand coordination that ties the gaze and the reach target influences the explicit process but not the implicit process.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  explicit strategy; implicit adaptation; reaching; sensorimotor learning; vision

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25253477     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00044.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  8 in total

1.  Using gaze behavior to parcellate the explicit and implicit contributions to visuomotor learning.

Authors:  Anouk J de Brouwer; Mohammed Albaghdadi; J Randall Flanagan; Jason P Gallivan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Evidence for distinct brain networks in the control of rule-based motor behavior.

Authors:  Joshua A Granek; Lauren E Sergio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Delay of gaze fixation during reaching movement with the non-dominant hand to a distant target.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Shannon D R Ringenbach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effect of repeated explicit instructions on visuomotor adaptation and intermanual transfer.

Authors:  Susen Werner; Heiko K Strüder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Eye-Hand Coordination during Visuomotor Adaptation with Different Rotation Angles: Effects of Terminal Visual Feedback.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Sebastian Rentsch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Visuomotor Prediction Errors Modulate EEG Activity Over Parietal Cortex.

Authors:  F-A Savoie; F Thénault; K Whittingstall; P-M Bernier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Effects of Reliability and Global Context on Explicit and Implicit Measures of Sensed Hand Position in Cursor-Control Tasks.

Authors:  Miya K Rand; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-12

8.  Dissociable cognitive strategies for sensorimotor learning.

Authors:  Samuel D McDougle; Jordan A Taylor
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 14.919

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.