| Literature DB >> 25253294 |
Shijun Bao, Xiaoqin Guo, Shengqing Yu, Jiabo Ding, Lei Tan, Fanqin Zhang, Yingjie Sun, Xusheng Qiu, Guanghua Chen, Chan Ding.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma synoviae is an avian pathogen that can lead to respiratory tract infections and arthritis in chickens and turkeys, resulting in serious economic losses to the poultry industry. Enolase reportedly plays important roles in several bacterial pathogens, but its role in M. synoviae has not been established. Therefore, in this study, the enolase encoding gene (eno) of M. synoviae was amplified from strain WVU1853 and expressed in E. coli BL21 cells. Then the enzymatic activity, immunogenicity and binding activity with chicken plasminogen (Plg) and human fibronectin (Fn) was evaluated.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25253294 PMCID: PMC4189797 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-014-0223-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Figure 1Analysis of rMsEno expression and purification using SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie blue staining. M: PageRuler™ Prestained Protein Ladder (SM0671, Fermentas). Lane 1: Total cellular proteins of E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells transformed by pET-28a (+). Lane 2: Total cellular proteins of E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells transformed by pET-Eno. Lane 3: Supernatant of lysate of E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells transformed by pET-Eno. Lane 4: Sediment of lysate of E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells transformed by pET-Eno. Lane 5: Purified recombinant protein.
Figure 2rMsEno enzymatic activity and its influence factors. (A) The enzymatic activity of rMsEno was determined by measuring the conversion of 2-PGA to PEP. (B) The effect of substrate (2-PGA) concentration on the enzymatic activity of rMsEno. (C) Km and Vmax for rMsEno were determined as 1.1 × 10−3 M and 0.793 μmol/L/min respectively, based on the Lineweaver–Burk plot (double-reciprocal plot).
Figure 3Determination of the localization of enolase. (A) Western blot analysis. Lane 1: Total cellular proteins of M. synoviae. Lane 2: Purified rMsEno was used as a positive control. Lane 3: The cytosolic proteins of M. synoviae. Lane 4: The membrane proteins of M. synoviae. Lane 5: BSA was used as a negative control. (B) Immunoelectron microscopy examination. Arrows pointed the M. synoviae enolase to be stained with goat anti-rabbit IgG labeled with 12 nm diametral colloidal gold particles. (C) Non-immunized rabbit serum showed no any binding activity.
Figure 4Binding assays. (A) Western blot analysis of the binding ability of rMsEno to chicken Plg. Lane 1: rMsEno; Lane 2: BSA. (B) Western blot analysis of the binding ability of rMsEno to human Fn. Lane 1: rMsEno; Lane 2: BSA. (C) The binding ability of rMsEno to chicken plg. (D) The binding ability of rMsEno to human Fn.
Figure 5Adherence and inhibition assays. (A) DF-1 cells pre-treated with Plg were infected with M. synoviae WVU 1853 strain. (B) The adherence was inhibited by rabbit anti-rMsEno serum. (C) Treatment with non-immune rabbit serum showed no influence on the bacterial adherence. (D) Negative control of uninfected DF-1 cells showed no bacterial attachment when incubated with the goat anti-rabbit IgG (whole molecule)-FITC.
Mycoplasmacidal activity of rabbit anti–rMsEno serum
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Rabbit anti- | 13 | 94.09** |
| Rabbit anti-rMsEno serum | 18 | 91.82** |
| Non-immunized rabbit serum | 220 | - |
| Blank control | 280 |
aData were expressed as geomeans of three experiments, analyzed using the Student’s t-test. **p < 0.01, compared to a negative control of non-immunized rabbit serum.
Primers used in this study
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| eno1F | CGA | 1 | 202 |
| eno1R | CACCTTTTCCACCAAA | 202 | |
| eno2F | CTAATTG | 179 | 785 |
| eno2R | AAATCCAGC | 963 | |
| eno3F | AAAGCGACTG | 944 | 399 |
| eno3R | CGG | 1342 |
aThe restriction sites of GAGCTC, CTCGAG for endonuclease SacI and XhoI were shown in italics.
bNucleotide substitutions were shown in boldface.
cLocalization was based on the nucleotide sequence of M. synoviae 53 eno gene (GeneID:3564671).