Literature DB >> 25253045

A phase I, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of oral panobinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors and various degrees of hepatic function.

Marije Slingerland1, Dagmar Hess, Sally Clive, Sunil Sharma, Per Sandstrom, Niklas Loman, Maria G Porro, Song Mu, Edward Waldron, Sue-Zette Valera, Hans Gelderblom.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of oral panobinostat in patients with advanced solid tumors and varying degrees of hepatic function.
METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies, acceptable bone marrow and renal function, and normal or impaired hepatic function, per NCI-ODWG criteria, were eligible. Initially patients received a single oral dose of 30 mg panobinostat for a 1-week pharmacokinetic study (core phase). Subsequently, patients received thrice-weekly panobinostat for as long as beneficial (extension phase safety assessment). Core phase serial blood samples for panobinostat and metabolite BJB432 assay were collected pre-dose and up to 96 h post-dose.
RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled, median age 58 years (range 45-76). Fifteen patients had hepatic dysfunction (8 mild, 6 moderate, and 1 severe). Reductions in panobinostat plasma clearance were 30 and 51 %, with concomitant 43 and 105 % increase in exposure, for patients with mild and moderate hepatic dysfunction, respectively. Median peak plasma concentrations were 1.4-(mild) and 1.8-(moderate) fold higher than the normal group. Hepatic impairment did not alter panobinostat absorption with Tmax unchanged at 2 h. Geometric mean ratios of BJB432 to panobinostat plasma AUC0-∞ were similar in patients with normal, mild, or moderate hepatic impairment. Safety data were consistent with known safety profile of panobinostat in patients with advanced cancers and normal liver function.
CONCLUSION: Despite increased plasma exposure, patients with mild or moderate hepatic dysfunction could be safely treated with the same starting dose of panobinostat as patients with normal hepatic function, with careful monitoring and dose adjustments as required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25253045     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-014-2594-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  11 in total

Review 1.  Panobinostat: first global approval.

Authors:  Karly P Garnock-Jones
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Panobinostat.

Authors:  Mathilde Van Veggel; Elsbeth Westerman; Paul Hamberg
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  HDAC Inhibition Induces MicroRNA-182, which Targets RAD51 and Impairs HR Repair to Sensitize Cells to Sapacitabine in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia.

Authors:  Tsung-Huei Lai; Brett Ewald; Alma Zecevic; Chaomei Liu; Melanie Sulda; Dimitrios Papaioannou; Ramiro Garzon; James S Blachly; William Plunkett; Deepa Sampath
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral panobinostat in patients with hematologic and solid tumors.

Authors:  Marina Savelieva; Margaret M Woo; Horst Schran; Song Mu; Jerry Nedelman; Renaud Capdeville
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  HIV Latency-Reversing Agents Have Diverse Effects on Natural Killer Cell Function.

Authors:  Carolina Garrido; Adam M Spivak; Natalia Soriano-Sarabia; Mary Ann Checkley; Edward Barker; Jonathan Karn; Vicente Planelles; David M Margolis
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 6.  Panobinostat as Pan-deacetylase Inhibitor for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer: Recent Progress and Future Prospects.

Authors:  Avineesh Singh; Vijay K Patel; Deepak K Jain; Preeti Patel; Harish Rajak
Journal:  Oncol Ther       Date:  2016-06-10

Review 7.  A review of the evidence base for utilizing Child-Pugh criteria for guiding dosing of anticancer drugs in patients with cancer and liver impairment.

Authors:  C Palmieri; I R Macpherson
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2021-06-05

8.  Panobinostat PK/PD profile in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Song Mu; Yoshiaki Kuroda; Hirohiko Shibayama; Masayuki Hino; Takeshi Tajima; Claudia Corrado; Rong Lin; Edward Waldron; Florence Binlich; Kenshi Suzuki
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Panobinostat for the treatment of multiple myeloma: the evidence to date.

Authors:  Hanna Bailey; David D Stenehjem; Sunil Sharma
Journal:  J Blood Med       Date:  2015-10-08

Review 10.  Efficacy of Panobinostat for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Evangelos Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou; Nikolaos Kanellias; Efstathios Kastritis; Maria Gavriatopoulou; Evangelos Terpos; Meletios Athanasios Dimopoulos
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 4.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.