Literature DB >> 25252757

Dose-response relationship in phase i clinical trials: a European Drug Development Network (EDDN) Collaboration Study.

Victor Moreno García1, David Olmos1, Carlos Gomez-Roca2, Philippe A Cassier1, Rafael Morales-Barrera3, Gianluca Del Conte4, Elisa Gallerani5, Andre T Brunetto6, Patrick Schöffski7, Silvia Marsoni8, Jan H M Schellens9, Nicolas Penel10, Emile Voest11, Jeffrey Evans12, Ruth Plummer13, Richard H Wilson14, Jean Charles Soria2, Josep Tabernero3, Jaap Verweij15, Stan B Kaye16.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Because a dose-response relationship is characteristic of conventional chemotherapy, this concept is widely used for the development of novel cytotoxic (CTX) drugs. However, the need to reach the MTD to obtain optimal benefit with molecularly targeted agents (MTA) is controversial. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between dose and efficacy in a large cohort of phase I patients with solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We collected data on 1,182 consecutive patients treated in phase I trials in 14 European institutions in 2005-2007. Inclusion criteria were: (i) patients treated within completed single-agent studies in which a maximum-administered dose was defined and (ii) RECIST/survival data available.
RESULTS: Seventy-two percent of patients were included in trials with MTA (N = 854) and 28% in trials with CTX (N = 328). The objective response (OR) rate was 3% and disease control at 6 months was 11%. OR for CTX was associated with higher doses (median 92% of MTD); this was not the case for MTA, where patients achieving OR received a median of 50% of MTD. For trials with MTA, patients treated at intermediate doses (40%-80%) had better survival compared with those receiving low or high doses (P = 0.038). On the contrary, there was a direct association between higher dose and better OS for CTX agents (P = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: Although these results support the development of novel CTX based on MTD, we found no direct relationship between higher doses and response with MTA in unselected patients. However, the longest OS was seen in patients treated with MTA at intermediate doses (40%-80% of MTD). ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25252757     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  5 in total

Review 1.  Early phase clinical trials of anticancer agents in children and adolescents - an ITCC perspective.

Authors:  Lucas Moreno; Andrew D J Pearson; Xavier Paoletti; Irene Jimenez; Birgit Geoerger; Pamela R Kearns; C Michel Zwaan; Francois Doz; Andre Baruchel; Josef Vormoor; Michela Casanova; Stefan M Pfister; Bruce Morland; Gilles Vassal
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Dose-finding designs for trials of molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapies.

Authors:  Cody Chiuzan; Jonathan Shtaynberger; Gulam A Manji; Jimmy K Duong; Gary K Schwartz; Anastasia Ivanova; Shing M Lee
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 1.051

Review 3.  Sex and Gender Differences in Anticancer Treatment Toxicity: A Call for Revisiting Drug Dosing in Oncology.

Authors:  Berna C Özdemir; Camille L Gerard; Cristina Espinosa da Silva
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.051

4.  Venous thromboembolism is a relevant and underestimated adverse event in cancer patients treated in phase I studies.

Authors:  M Mandalà; F Grosso; C Vitalini; I Corradino; R Sanfilippo; S Colombini; M Clerici; R Labianca; A De Pascale; S Marsoni
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Potential utility of a longitudinal relative dose intensity of molecularly targeted agents in phase 1 dose-finding trials.

Authors:  Akihiro Hirakawa; Kan Yonemori; Fumie Kinoshita; Yumiko Kobayashi; Hitomi S Okuma; Asuka Kawachi; Kenji Tamura; Yasuhiro Fujiwara; Larry Rubinstein; Pamela Jo Harris; Naoko Takebe
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 6.716

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.