Literature DB >> 2525261

Mouse skin photosensitivity with dihaematoporphyrin ether (DHE) and aluminium sulphonated phthalocyanine (AlSPc): a comparative study.

C J Tralau, A R Young, N P Walker, D I Vernon, A J MacRobert, S B Brown, S G Bown.   

Abstract

Skin photosensitivity of sun exposed sites is the major side effect of dihaematoporphyrin ether (DHE) photodynamic therapy (PDT). Reports of severe oedema and erythema have generally been anecdotal. We have studied aluminium sulphonated phthalocyanine (AlSPc) as a potential photosensitiser for PDT. In this paper we report our work comparing the skin photosensitivity reactions of DHE and AlSPc. We have studied: (i) the time course of the skin reactions, (ii) the effect of increasing time from administration of photosensitiser to irradiation, (iii) drug-skin reaction dose response. Groups of Skh I female hairless albino mice were given an intravenous bolus dose of either 0.9% saline solution, AlSPc or DHE (Photofrin II). Drug doses ranged from 0.5 to 50 mg/kg. At times ranging from 1 h to 1 month animals were irradiated with a range of doses of solar simulated radiation (SSR). The skin reaction was observed over a 2 week period. DHE reactions were always more severe than those with AlSPc. Peak skin reaction was seen at 3 h for DHE and 6 h for AlSPc. DHE reactions were still visible 2 weeks after irradiation whereas the AlSPc reaction disappeared by 48 h. Irradiation evoked a reaction up to 2 months after administration of DHE but only up to 2 weeks with AlSPc. The mean SSR dose at which a skin reaction was seen decreased with increasing dose of both agents. The rate of decrease was slower with AlSPc than DHE. This study suggests that in PDT, AlSPc will cause much less skin photosensitivity than DHE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2525261     DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1989.tb04111.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol        ISSN: 0031-8655            Impact factor:   3.421


  19 in total

1.  Experimental studies to assess the potential of photodynamic therapy for the treatment of bronchial carcinomas.

Authors:  S G Smith; J Bedwell; A J MacRobert; M H Griffiths; S G Bown; M R Hetzel
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Possible advantages of aluminum-chloro-tetrasulfonated phthalocyanine over hematoporphyrin derivative as a photosensitizer in photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  K Koshida; H Hisazumi; K Komatsu; A Hirata; T Uchibayashi
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1993

3.  Mucosal ablation using photodynamic therapy for the treatment of dysplasia: an experimental study in the normal rat stomach.

Authors:  C S Loh; A J MacRobert; G Buonaccorsi; N Krasner; S G Bown
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Current status of photodynamic therapy in oncology.

Authors:  R van Hillegersberg; W J Kort; J H Wilson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Photodynamic therapy of a transplanted pancreatic cancer model using meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (mTHPC).

Authors:  P Mikvy; H Messman; A J MacRobert; M Pauer; V R Sams; C L Davies; J C Stewart; S G Bown
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  The significance of the nature of the photosensitizer for photodynamic therapy: quantitative and biological studies in the colon.

Authors:  H Barr; A J MacRobert; C J Tralau; P B Boulos; S G Bown
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Photodynamic therapy-induced alterations in interstitial fluid pressure, volume and water content of an amelanotic melanoma in the hamster.

Authors:  M Leunig; A E Goetz; F Gamarra; G Zetterer; K Messmer; R K Jain
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Photocytotoxic efficacy of sulphonated species of aluminium phthalocyanine against cell monolayers, multicellular spheroids and in vivo tumours.

Authors:  W S Chan; C M West; J V Moore; I R Hart
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Distribution and photodynamic effect of disulphonated aluminium phthalocyanine in the pancreas and adjacent tissues in the Syrian golden hamster.

Authors:  P J Nuutinen; P T Chatlani; J Bedwell; A J MacRobert; D Phillips; S G Bown
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  In vivo fluorescence and photodynamic activity of zinc phthalocyanine administered in liposomes.

Authors:  H L van Leengoed; V Cuomo; A A Versteeg; N van der Veen; G Jori; W M Star
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.