BACKGROUND: TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion is the most frequent genetic alteration in prostate cancer. However, information about its distribution in lymph node positive prostate cancers and the prognostic significance in these advanced tumors is unknown. METHODS: Gene fusion status was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization on a tissue-microarray constructed from 119 hormone-naïve nodal positive, surgically treated prostate cancers containing samples from the primary tumors and corresponding lymph node metastases. Data were correlated with various tumor features (Gleason score, stage, cancer volume, nodal tumor burden) and biochemical recurrence-free, disease-specific, and overall survival. RESULTS: TMPRSS2-ERG fusion was detected in 43.5% of the primary tumors. Conversely, only 29.9% of the metastasizing components showed the fusion. Concordance in TMPRSS2-ERG status between primary tumors and metastases was 70.9% (Kappa 0.39); 20.9% and 8.1% of the patients showed the mutation solely in their primary tumors and metastases, respectively. TMPRSS2-ERG fusion was not correlated with specific histopathological tumor features but predicted favorable biochemical recurrence-free, disease-specific and overall survival independently when present in the primary tumor (P < 0.05 each). CONCLUSION: TMPRSS2-ERG fusion is more frequent in primary prostate cancer than in corresponding metastases suggesting no selection of fusion-positive cells in the metastatic process. The gene fusion in primary tumors independently predicts favorable outcome.
BACKGROUND:TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusion is the most frequent genetic alteration in prostate cancer. However, information about its distribution in lymph node positive prostate cancers and the prognostic significance in these advanced tumors is unknown. METHODS: Gene fusion status was determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization on a tissue-microarray constructed from 119 hormone-naïve nodal positive, surgically treated prostate cancers containing samples from the primary tumors and corresponding lymph node metastases. Data were correlated with various tumor features (Gleason score, stage, cancer volume, nodal tumor burden) and biochemical recurrence-free, disease-specific, and overall survival. RESULTS:TMPRSS2-ERG fusion was detected in 43.5% of the primary tumors. Conversely, only 29.9% of the metastasizing components showed the fusion. Concordance in TMPRSS2-ERG status between primary tumors and metastases was 70.9% (Kappa 0.39); 20.9% and 8.1% of the patients showed the mutation solely in their primary tumors and metastases, respectively. TMPRSS2-ERG fusion was not correlated with specific histopathological tumor features but predicted favorable biochemical recurrence-free, disease-specific and overall survival independently when present in the primary tumor (P < 0.05 each). CONCLUSION:TMPRSS2-ERG fusion is more frequent in primary prostate cancer than in corresponding metastases suggesting no selection of fusion-positive cells in the metastatic process. The gene fusion in primary tumors independently predicts favorable outcome.
Authors: Cindy Ke Zhou; Denise Young; Edward D Yeboah; Sally B Coburn; Yao Tettey; Richard B Biritwum; Andrew A Adjei; Evelyn Tay; Shelley Niwa; Ann Truelove; Judith Welsh; James E Mensah; Robert N Hoover; Isabell A Sesterhenn; Ann W Hsing; Shiv Srivastava; Michael B Cook Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Martine P Roudier; Brian R Winters; Ilsa Coleman; Hung-Ming Lam; Xiaotun Zhang; Roger Coleman; Lisly Chéry; Lawrence D True; Celestia S Higano; Bruce Montgomery; Paul H Lange; Linda A Snyder; Shiv Srivastava; Eva Corey; Robert L Vessella; Peter S Nelson; Aykut Üren; Colm Morrissey Journal: Prostate Date: 2016-03-16 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Franziska Brandi; Katharina Grupp; Claudia Hube-Magg; Martina Kluth; Dagmar Lang; Sarah Minner; Christina Möller-Koop; Markus Graefen; Hans Heinzer; Maria Christina Tsourlakis; Corinna Wittmer; Frank Jacobsen; Hartwig Huland; Stefan Steurer; Patrick Lebok; Andrea Hinsch; Waldemar Wilczak; Thorsten Schlomm; Ronald Simon Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2018-09-07 Impact factor: 2.967
Authors: Tamara S Rodems; Duane S Juang; Charlotte N Stahlfeld; Cole S Gilsdorf; Tim E G Krueger; Erika Heninger; Shuang G Zhao; Jamie M Sperger; David J Beebe; Michael C Haffner; Joshua M Lang Journal: Clin Epigenetics Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 7.259