Literature DB >> 25251946

Cost-benefit analysis of the Swiss national policy on reducing micropollutants in treated wastewater.

Ivana Logar1, Roy Brouwer, Max Maurer, Christoph Ort.   

Abstract

Contamination of freshwater with micropollutants (MPs) is a growing concern worldwide. Even at very low concentrations, MPs can have adverse effects on aquatic ecosystems and possibly also on human health. Switzerland is one of the first countries to start implementing a national policy to reduce MPs in the effluents of municipal sewage treatment plants (STPs). This paper estimates the benefits of upgrading STPs based on public's stated preferences. To assess public demand for the reduction of the environmental and health risks of MPs, we conducted a choice experiment in a national online survey. The results indicate that the average willingness to pay per household is CHF 100 (US$ 73) annually for reducing the potential environmental risk of MPs to a low level. These benefits, aggregated over households in the catchment of the STPs to be upgraded, generate a total annual economic value of CHF 155 million (US$ 113 million). This compares with estimated annual costs for upgrading 123 STPs of CHF 133 million (US$ 97 million) or CHF 86 (US$ 63) per household connected to these STPs. Hence, a cost-benefit analysis justifies the investment decision from an economic point of view and supports the implementation of the national policy in the ongoing political discussion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25251946     DOI: 10.1021/es502338j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  4 in total

1.  Environmental Risk Assessment of Pharmaceutical Mixtures: Demands, Gaps, and Possible Bridges.

Authors:  Thomas Backhaus
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Thermodynamic entropy of organic oxidation in the water environment: experimental evaluation compared to semi-empirical calculation.

Authors:  Li Luo; Xiaochang C Wang; Huu Hao Ngo; Wenshan Guo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Environmental Footprint of Wastewater Treatment: A Step Forward in the Use of Toxicological Tools.

Authors:  Giorgio Bertanza; Jennifer Boniotti; Elisabetta Ceretti; Donatella Feretti; Giovanna Mazzoleni; Michele Menghini; Roberta Pedrazzani; Nathalie Steimberg; Chiara Urani; Gaia Claudia Viviana Viola; Ilaria Zerbini; Emanuele Ziliani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Status of hormones and painkillers in wastewater effluents across several European states-considerations for the EU watch list concerning estradiols and diclofenac.

Authors:  P Schröder; B Helmreich; B Škrbić; M Carballa; M Papa; C Pastore; Z Emre; A Oehmen; A Langenhoff; M Molinos; J Dvarioniene; C Huber; K P Tsagarakis; E Martinez-Lopez; S Meric Pagano; C Vogelsang; G Mascolo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 4.223

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.