Literature DB >> 2525182

Differences between a supervised and independent strength and conditioning program with chronic low back syndromes.

K Reilly1, B Lovejoy, R Williams, H Roth.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in physiologic parameters seen in a group of patients with chronic low back syndrome assigned to supervised and independent strength and conditioning programs. Forty patients with chronic low back syndrome were assigned either to a control group (independent exercise) or to an experimental group (supervised exercise). All subjects underwent pre-testing for aerobic fitness, strength and responses to visual analog pain rating scales. Twenty control subjects were given predesigned exercise programs and told to exercise four times per week for 6 months. Twenty experimental subjects were given predesigned exercise programs but were monitored by a strength and conditioning specialist for the same period. Statistically significant results were seen for increases in aerobic fitness and strength, decreases in reported pain, and percent body fat in the experimental group. Since the experimental group completed 90.75 sessions out of 96, compared with 31.95 for the control group, it could be concluded that supervision increases chances for compliance and success as measured by these parameters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2525182     DOI: 10.1097/00043764-198906000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Med        ISSN: 0096-1736


  9 in total

Review 1.  Is a positive clinical outcome after exercise therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain contingent upon a corresponding improvement in the targeted aspect(s) of performance? A systematic review.

Authors:  F Steiger; B Wirth; E D de Bruin; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Simple low back pain: rest or active exercise?

Authors:  G Waddell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  Smartphone app in self-management of chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  H S Chhabra; Sunil Sharma; Shalini Verma
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  [Motivation for physical activity - a survey in a Central European state].

Authors:  Florian Wepner; Julia Hahne; Peter Machacek; Jörg Holzapfel; Martin Friedrich
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 5.  Interventions to improve adherence to exercise for chronic musculoskeletal pain in adults.

Authors:  Joanne L Jordan; Melanie A Holden; Elizabeth Ej Mason; Nadine E Foster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

6.  "Physio anywhere": digitally-enhanced outpatient care as a legacy of coronavirus 2020.

Authors:  Christopher Tack; Jack Grodon; Faye Shorthouse; Nicolas Spahr
Journal:  Physiotherapy       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 3.358

7.  Hybrid Ubiquitous Coaching With a Novel Combination of Mobile and Holographic Conversational Agents Targeting Adherence to Home Exercises: Four Design and Evaluation Studies.

Authors:  Tobias Kowatsch; Kim-Morgaine Lohse; Valérie Erb; Leo Schittenhelm; Helen Galliker; Rea Lehner; Elaine M Huang
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Telerehabilitation for upper limb disabilities: a scoping review on functions, outcomes, and evaluation methods.

Authors:  Khadijeh Moulaei; Abbas Sheikhtaheri; Mansour Shahabi Nezhad; AliAkbar Haghdoost; Mohammad Gheysari; Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy
Journal:  Arch Public Health       Date:  2022-08-23

9.  A Portable System for Remote Rehabilitation Following a Total Knee Replacement: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.

Authors:  Kevin M Bell; Chukwudi Onyeukwu; Clair N Smith; Adrianna Oh; Annette Devito Dabbs; Sara R Piva; Adam J Popchak; Andrew D Lynch; James J Irrgang; Michael P McClincy
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.