Literature DB >> 25250973

Measuring surgical quality: which measure should we trust?

Hillary J Mull1, Qi Chen2, Michael Shwartz3, Kamal M F Itani4, Amy K Rosen1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 25250973      PMCID： PMC4570481          DOI： 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN： 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; K Hur; J Demakis; J B Aust; V Chong; P J Fabri; J O Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G Irvin; G McDonald; E Passaro; L Phillips; F Scamman; J Spencer; J F Stremple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Multi-item "instruments" vs Virginia Apgar's principles of clinimetrics.

Authors:  A R Feinstein
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1999-01-25

Review 3.  The Surgical Infection Prevention and Surgical Care Improvement Projects: promises and pitfalls.

Authors:  Dale W Bratzler
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 0.688
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Association of preoperative albumin-bilirubin with surgical textbook outcomes following laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Fei-Qi Xu; Tai-Wei Ye; Dong-Dong Wang; Ya-Ming Xie; Kang-Jun Zhang; Jian Cheng; Zun-Qiang Xiao; Si-Yu Liu; Kai Jiang; Wei-Feng Yao; Guo-Liang Shen; Jun-Wei Liu; Cheng-Wu Zhang; Dong-Sheng Huang; Lei Liang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 5.738
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.