Literature DB >> 25250852

Longevity and cost of implantable intrathecal drug delivery systems for chronic pain management: a retrospective analysis of 365 patients.

Robert Bolash1, Belinda Udeh, Youssef Saweris, Maged Guirguis, Jarrod E Dalton, Natalya Makarova, Nagy Mekhail.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Intrathecal drug delivery systems represent an important component of interventional strategies for refractory chronic pain syndromes. Continuous intrathecal administration of opioids results in higher subarachnoid drug concentrations, improved pain scores, and less frequent side effects when compared with systemic opioid administration. Substantial costs arise at the time of surgical implantation and at revision for battery depletion or treatment of a complication. Despite current widespread use, the real-world longevity and cost of implanted intrathecal pumps (ITP) has not been fully quantified.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with an ITP implanted at Cleveland Clinic Pain Management Center between January 1998 and December 2012 were included. ITP longevity was calculated as the time between implant and explant for depletion of the system's battery. Using the 2013 fee schedule of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the daily cost of having a functioning ITP was calculated. The costs of office visits for pump refills and the cost of intrathecal medications were not included, nor were the possible savings due to decreased utilization of alternate medical services.
RESULTS: Three hundred sixty-five patients had 559 pumps implanted. Postlaminectomy syndrome was the most common indication (40%). The median system longevity for all pumps was 5.4 years (97.5% confidence interval: [5.0, 5.8]), including pumps extracted prematurely, as well as those that reached the elective replacement interval. The median ITP longevity was 5.9 years (95% confidence interval: [5.6, 6.1]) for pumps explanted for end of battery life. The median system cost per day was $10.46. The median cost per day of pumps explanted for end of battery life was $9.26, versus $44.59 for pumps explanted prematurely due to complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the cohort experienced an increased incidence of pump-related complications and a device longevity that was within the range of the manufacturer's anticipated lifespan. Increasing the lifespan of the ITP and improving patient selection have the potential to significantly improve the cost-effectiveness of intrathecal therapy.
© 2014 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adverse events; chronic pain; complications; cost of therapy; indications; intrathecal drug delivery; intrathecal pump; intrathecal pump longevity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25250852      PMCID: PMC4786068          DOI: 10.1111/ner.12235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  14 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of long-term intrathecal morphine therapy for pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  G de Lissovoy; R E Brown; M Halpern; S J Hassenbusch; E Ross
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.393

2.  Treatment of chronic pain by using intrathecal drug therapy compared with conventional pain therapies: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Krishna Kumar; Gary Hunter; Denny D Demeria
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Outcome of intrathecal opioids in chronic non-cancer pain.

Authors:  L J Roberts; P M Finch; C R Goucke; L M Price
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.931

4.  Influence of a latent period in QALY analysis: pilot study of intrathecal drug delivery systems for chronic non-malignant pain.

Authors:  Simon A Biggs; Rui V Duarte; Jon H Raphael; Robert L Ashford
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 1.596

5.  Infectious complications related to intrathecal drug delivery system and spinal cord stimulator system implantations at a comprehensive cancer pain center.

Authors:  Mitchell P Engle; Baominh P Vinh; Nusrat Harun; Dhanalakshmi Koyyalagunta
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 6.  Opioid complications and side effects.

Authors:  Ramsin Benyamin; Andrea M Trescot; Sukdeb Datta; Ricardo Buenaventura; Rajive Adlaka; Nalini Sehgal; Scott E Glaser; Ricardo Vallejo
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Intrathecal opioid treatment for chronic non-malignant pain: a 3-year prospective study.

Authors:  Mark A Thimineur; Edward Kravitz; Mohan S Vodapally
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Intrathecal morphine infusion for chronic non-malignant pain: a multiple center retrospective survey.

Authors:  Theodore B Njee; Bernard Irthum; Philippe Roussel; Jean-Claude Peragut
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2004-10

Review 9.  Prevalence of opioid adverse events in chronic non-malignant pain: systematic review of randomised trials of oral opioids.

Authors:  R Andrew Moore; Henry J McQuay
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 5.156

10.  Rate of complications among the recipients of intrathecal baclofen pump in Japan: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Takaomi Taira; Takayoshi Ueta; Yoichi Katayama; Mamori Kimizuka; Akinobu Nemoto; Hidehiro Mizusawa; Meigen Liu; Motonao Koito; Yuko Hiro; Hirokazu Tanabe
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2012-12-14
View more
  3 in total

1.  Retrospective analysis of the financial break-even point for intrathecal morphine pump use in Korea.

Authors:  Eun Kyoung Kim; Ji Yeon Shin; Anyela Marcela Castañeda; Seung Jae Lee; Hyun Kyu Yoon; Yong Chul Kim; Jee Youn Moon
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2017-09-29

Review 2.  The Proteomics of Intrathecal Analgesic agents for Chronic Pain.

Authors:  David M Moore; Connail McCrory
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 7.363

3.  Patient Satisfaction Following Intrathecal Targeted Drug Delivery for Benign Chronic Pain: Results of a Single-Center Survey Study.

Authors:  David M Schultz; Vwaire Orhurhu; Faizan Khan; Jonathan M Hagedorn; Alaa Abd-Elsayed
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-05-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.